Appl Clin Inform 2018; 09(01): 199-204
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635096
Case Report
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Collaborating for Competency—A Model for Single Electronic Health Record Onboarding for Medical Students Rotating among Separate Health Systems

Anne G. Pereira
1   Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Michael Kim
1   Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Marcus Seywerd
2   Fairview Health Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Brooke Nesbitt
3   Department of Integrated Education, Clinical Experiences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Michael B. Pitt
4   Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
on behalf of the Minnesota Epic101 Collaborative › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

14 September 2017

20 January 2018

Publication Date:
21 March 2018 (online)


Background Use of the electronic health record (EHR) is widespread in academic medical centers, and hands-on EHR experience in medical school is essential for new residents to be able to meaningfully contribute to patient care. As system-specific EHR training is not portable across institutions—even when the same EHR platform is used—students rotating across health systems are often required to spend time away from clinical training to complete each system's, often duplicative, EHR training regardless of their competency within the EHR.

Methods We aimed to create a single competency-based Epic onboarding process that would be portable across all the institutions in which our medical students complete clinical rotations. In collaboration with six health systems, we created online EHR training modules using a systematic approach to curriculum development and created an assessment within the Epic practice environment.

Results All six collaborating health systems accepted successful completion of the developed assessment in lieu of standard site-specific medical student EHR training. In the pilot year, 443 students (94%) completed the modules and assessment prior to their clinical training and successfully entered clinical rotations without time consuming, often repetitive onsite training, decreasing the cumulative time as student might be expected to engage in Epic onboarding as much as 20-fold.

Conclusion Medical schools with multisystem training sites with a single type of EHR can adopt this approach to minimize training burden for their learners and to allow them more time in the clinical setting with optimized access to the EHR.

* Minnesota Epic 101 Collaborative: E. Dewyre, K. Dean, C. Marshall, R. Miner, G. Olive, P. Papanno, V. Valentino, P. Varhol.

Supplementary Material

  • References

  • 1 Tierney MJ, Pageler NM, Kahana M, Pantaleoni JL, Longhurst CA. Medical education in the electronic medical record (EMR) era: benefits, challenges, and future directions. Acad Med 2013; 88 (06) 748-752
  • 2 Hammoud MM, Dalymple JL, Christner JG. , et al. Medical student documentation in electronic health records: a collaborative statement from the Alliance for Clinical Education. Teach Learn Med 2012; 24 (03) 257-266
  • 3 Hammoud MM, Margo K, Christner JG, Fisher J, Fischer SH, Pangaro LN. Opportunities and challenges in integrating electronic health records into undergraduate medical education: a national survey of clerkship directors. Teach Learn Med 2012; 24 (03) 219-224
  • 4 Gagliardi JP, Turner DA. The electronic health record and education: Rethinking optimization. J Grad Med Educ 2016; 8 (03) 325-327
  • 5 Atwater AR, Rudd M, Brown A. , et al. Developing teaching strategies in the EHR era: a survey of GME experts using the Delphi technique. J Grad Med Educ 2016; 8 (04) 581-586
  • 6 Association of American Medical Colleges. Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; updated 2014. . Available at: . Accessed July 31, 2017
  • 7 Matson C, Stephens M, Steiner B, Kozakowski SM. Electronic health records: how will students learn if they can't practice?. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12 (06) 582-583
  • 8 Friedman E, Sainte M, Fallar R. Taking note of the perceived value and impact of medical student chart documentation on education and patient care. Acad Med 2010; 85 (09) 1440-1444
  • 9 Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. , Eds. Curriculum Development for Medical Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009
  • 10 Elliott K, Judd T, McColl G. A student-centred electronic health record system for clinical education. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 168: 57-64