Synlett 2017; 28(09): 1051-1056
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1588415
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Tandem Oxidative Phenol Dearomatization/Formal [3+2] Annulation Protocol En Route to Highly Functionalized Benzothiophenes

Santhosh Kumar Chittimalla*
Medicinal Chemistry Department, AMRI Singapore Research Centre, 61 Science Park Road, #05-01, The Galen, Science Park II, Singapore 117525, Singapore   Email: santhosh.chittimalla@amriglobal.com   Email: chemcsk@gmail.com
,
Chennakesavulu Bandi
Medicinal Chemistry Department, AMRI Singapore Research Centre, 61 Science Park Road, #05-01, The Galen, Science Park II, Singapore 117525, Singapore   Email: santhosh.chittimalla@amriglobal.com   Email: chemcsk@gmail.com
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 26 October 2016

Accepted after revision: 17 January 2017

Publication Date:
09 February 2017 (online)


Abstract

A new strategy for the synthesis of benzothiophenes through formal [3+2] annulation of sulfanylacetaldehyde and cyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-one monoketals has been developed. This approach relies on the ease of aromatization of tetrahydrobenzothiophenone derivatives prepared by the aforementioned protocol. Given the ready accessibility of various substituted cyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-one monoketals, a range of benzothiophene derivatives became available.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Li P, Du J, Xie Y, Tao M, Zhang W.-Q. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016; 4: 1139-1139
    • 1b McNabola N, O’Connor CJ, Roydhouse MD, Wall MD, Southern JM. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 4598-4598
    • 1c Wang K, Kim D, Dömling A. J. Comb. Chem. 2010; 12: 111-111
    • 1d Eller GA, Holzer W. Molecules 2006; 11: 371-371
    • 2a Mallia CJ, Englert L, Walter GC, Baxendale IR. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015; 11: 875-875
    • 2b Bentya AV, Mel’nichenko NV, Vovk MV. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 52: 292-292
  • 3 Mari G, Favi LD, De Crescentini L, Santeusanio S, Attanasi OA, Mantellini F. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016; 5: 705-705
  • 4 Kumar SV, Muthusubramanian S, Perumal S. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 90451-90451
  • 5 Kumar SV, Perumal S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 3761-3761
  • 6 Wei H, Sun M, Ji M. J. Chem. Res. 2009; 359-359
    • 7a Shi W, Sun S, Hu Y, Gao T, Peng Y, Wu M, Guo H, Wang J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015; 56: 3861-3861
    • 7b Yao L, Zhu Q, Wei L, Wang Z.-F, Wang C.-J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 5829-5829
    • 7c Baricordi N, Benetti S, Bertolasi V, De Risi C, Pollini GP, Zamberlan F, Zanirato V. Tetrahedron 2012; 68: 208-208
  • 8 Shi W, Wan L, Hu Y, Sun S, Li W, Peng Y, Wu M, Guo H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015; 56: 2083-2083
  • 9 Brown MD, Gillon DW, Meakins GD, Whitham GH. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985; 1623-1623
    • 10a Goodyear MD, Hill ML, West JP, Whitehead AJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005; 46: 8535-8535
    • 10b Mansour T, Tse A, Evans CA, Jin H, Zacharie B, Nguyen-Ba N, Belleau B. WO 9414802, 1994
  • 12 Fang X, Li J, Tao H.-Y, Wang C.-J. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 5554-5554

    • Selected recent articles on the synthesis of benzothiophenes follow. For metal-catalyzed processes, see:
    • 13a Anxionnat B, Pardo DG, Ricci G, Rossen K, Cossy J. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 3876-3876
    • 13b Yu H, Zhang M, Li Y. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 8898-8898
    • 13c Wu B, Yoshikai N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 10496-10496
    • 13d Sun L.-L, Deng C.-L, Tang R.-Y, Zhang X.-G. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 7546-7546
    • 13e Nakamura I, Sato T, Yamamoto Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 4473-4473
    • 13f Yue D, Larock RC. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 1905-1905

    • For non-metal-mediated processes, see:
    • 13g Kong Y, Yu L, Fu L, Cao J, Lai G, Cui Y, Hu Z, Wang G. Synthesis 2013; 45: 1975-1975
    • 13h Zhang X, Zeng W, Yang Y, Huang H, Liang Y. Synlett 2013; 24: 1687-1687
    • 13i Hessian KO, Flynn BL. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 4377-4377
    • 14a Chittimalla SK, Bandi C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 15-15
    • 14b Chittimalla SK, Kuppusamy R, Akavaram N. Synlett 2015; 26: 613-613
    • 14c Chittimalla SK, Kuppusamy R, Bandi C. Synlett 2014; 25: 1991-1991
    • 14d Chittimalla SK, Bandi C, Putturu S, Kuppusamy R, Boellaard KC, Tan DC. T, Lum DM. J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 2565-2565
    • 14e Vitaku E, Njardarson JT. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 3679-3679
  • 15 Chittimalla SK, Koodalingam M, Bandi C, Putturu S, Kuppusamy R. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 1460-1460
    • 16a See the Supporting Information for the synthetic procedures.
    • 16b The relative stereochemistry of all the products was tentatively assigned on the basis of the 2D NOESY spectra of 4a and 4f. Literature precedents7 also indicate a similar stereochemical preference for the [3+2]-annulation product.
  • 17 3-Hydroxy-5,5,6-trimethoxy-3,3a,5,7a-tetrahydro-1-benzothiophen-4(2H)-one (4a) and 5,6-dimethoxy-1-benzothiophene-4-ol (5a); Typical Procedure PhI(OAc)2 (251 mg, 0.78 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was added to a solution of 2,3-dimethoxyphenol (2a; 100 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in MeOH (2 mL) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 15 min, after which NaHCO3 (273 mg, 3.25 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-dithiane (1; 59 mg, 0.39 mmol, 0.6 equiv) were added sequentially and the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 4 h. The solvent was then evaporated and residue was diluted with H2O, and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic extracts were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated, and the crude residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc–hexanes)/hexanes to give 4a as a yellow-to-orange gum; yield: 151 mg (90%). Alternatively, the crude product was diluted with 1,4-dioxane (0.5 mL), followed by addition of 4 N HCl in 1,4-dioxane (1 mL, 6.15 mmol, ~9.5 equiv). The resulting mixture was then heated at 50 °C for 2 h to give the benzothiophene derivative 5a; yield: 115 mg (84%). All the benzothiophene derivatives were obtained as dark-orange to brown solids. Note 1: In the case of quinone monoketals 3j (100 mg, 0.49 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 3k (100 mg, 0.35 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 1.0 equivalent each of 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-dithiane and triethylamine were used. Note 2: In the case of 4-chloro-2-methoxyphenol (2i; 100 mg, 0.63 mmol, 1.0 equiv), after the oxidation step, regular workup was performed, and the resulting crude dienone 3i was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (2 mL), followed by addition of Et3N (0.4 mL, 3.15 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-dithiane (1; 96 mg, 0.63 mmol, 1.0 equiv). After 2 h reaction time, 4 N HCl in 1,4-dioxane (1 mL, 6.3 mmol, 10 equiv) was added and the reaction mixture was heated at 50 °C for 16 h to give the benzothiophene derivatives 5i and 8i. 4a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 5.14 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.97–4.94 (m, 1 H), 4.56 (dd, J = 6.8, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.64 (s, 3 H), 3.41 (dd, J = 6.8, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.35 (dd, J = 11.6, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.34 (s, 3 H), 3.29 (s, 3 H), 2.89 (dd, J = 11.6, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.50 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.4 (C), 152.1 (C), 101.9 (CH), 96.8 (C), 74.6 (CH), 58.5 (CH), 55.4 (CH3), 52.2 (CH3), 51.5 (CH3), 42.6 (CH), 39.9 (CH2). ESI-MS: m/z = 229 [C11H16O5S – CH3OH + H]+. 5a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.39 (dd, J = 5.6, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.19 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.94 (app s, 1 H), 6.21 (br s, 1 H), 3.925 (s, 3 H), 3.921 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 151.4 (C), 143.7 (C), 136.4 (C), 132.7 (C), 123.3 (C), 122.9 (CH), 120.1 (CH), 96.4 (CH), 61.3 (CH3), 56.0 (CH3). ESI-MS: m/z = 211 [C10H10O3S + H]+. 6-Chloro-5-methoxy-1-benzothiophene-4-ol (5f) brown solid: yield: 78 mg (58%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.43 (td, J = 5.6, 0.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.35 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.13 (s, 1 H), 3.95 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 144.3 (C), 138.7 (C), 136.9 (C), 128.4 (C), 126.1 (CH), 124.6 (C), 120.2 (CH), 114.5 (CH), 61.5 (CH3); ESI-MS: m/z = 215 [C9H7ClO2S + H]+. 5-Methoxy-7-methyl-1-benzothiophene-4-ol (5m) brown solid: yield: 103 mg (73%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.50 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.36 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.86 (s, 1 H), 5.87 (s, 1 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H), 2.50 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 142.4 (C), 138.5 (C), 134.0 (C), 128.4 (C), 125.6 (CH), 122.7 (C), 120.6 (CH), 111.1 (CH), 57.3 (CH3), 19.9 (CH3). ESI-MS: m/z = 195 [C10H10O2S + H]+. 4,5-Dihydroxy-1-benzothiophene-6-carbaldehyde (8c) dark orange solid: yield: 53 mg (65%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 10.7 (s, 1 H), 9.95 (s, 1 H), 7.66 (d, J = 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.64 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.50 (dd, J = 5.6, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.01 (br s, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.2 (C), 142.1 (C), 138.9 (C), 134.3 (C), 132.2 (CH + C), 120.4 (CH), 119.7 (CH), 119.5 (C). ESI-MS: m/z = 193 [C9H6O3S – H]. 6,7-Dichloro-3-hydroxy-5-methoxy-3,3a,7,7a-tetrahydro-1-benzothiophen-4(2H)-one (10) orange gum: yield: 23 mg (14%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 5.10 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.27–4.25 (m, 1 H), 3.85 (s, 3 H), 3.84–3.83 (m, 1 H), 3.13–3.09 (m, 1 H), 2.92 (br s, 1 H), 2.86 (dd, J = 15.2, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.59 (dd, J = 15.2, 3.2 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 188.8 (C), 149.8 (C), 133.5 (C), 68.2 (CH), 60.8 (CH3), 57.7 (CH), 56.5 (CH), 48.7 (CH), 28.6 (CH2). ESI-MS: m/z = 269 [C9H10Cl2O3S + H]+. 5,6-dimethoxy-3-methyl-1-benzothiophene-4-ol (14a); Typical Procedure 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-dithiane (13; 97 mg, 0.54 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and Et3N (0.075 mL, 0.54 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were added sequentially to a solution of the cyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-one 3a (100 mg, 0.54 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) at r.t. After 30 min, the mixture was diluted with H2O, and extracted with EtOAc. The organic extracts were then dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated. The crude product was treated with 4 N aq HCl (1 mL, 7.4 mmol, ~14 equiv) and the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 10 min, then heated to 50 °C for 16 h. The solvents were evaporated and the residue was diluted with H2O then extracted with EtOAc. The organic extracts were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated, and the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc–hexanes) to give a brown solid: yield: 80 mg (55%). All benzothiophene derivatives 14 were obtained as brown solids.

    • When in situ-generated cyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-ones were used in the subsequent reactions, NaHCO3 was added to the mixture to neutralize AcOH released from PhI(OAc)2; see:
    • 18a Liu W.-C, Liao C.-C. Chem. Commun. 1999; 117-117
    • 18b Liao C.-C, Chu C.-S, Lee T.-H, Rao PD, Ko S, Song L.-D, Shiao H.-C. J. Org. Chem. 1999; 64: 4102-4102
    • 18c Chu C.-S, Lee T.-H, Liao C.-C. Synlett 1994; 635-635
  • 19 Nevertheless, small amounts of unexpected products were isolated from these reactions. See the Supporting Information.
    • 20a Although products 4k and 4k′ were eventually separated, to our disappointment, only 4j′ could be cleanly separated from 4j/4j′.
    • 20b The diastereoisomers were tentatively assigned on the basis of 1H and 13C NMR δ values. See the Supporting Information.
  • 21 Compound 9, on heating to 50 °C for 3 h in the presence of 4 N HCl in 1,4-dioxane, gave a 4:1 ratio of 5e and 9, as indicated by diagnostic peak integration of the 1H NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixture.
    • 22a Chittimalla SK, Bandi C. RSC Adv. 2013; 3: 13663-13663
    • 22b Liao C.-C, Peddinti RK. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002; 35: 856-856
  • 23 Chittimalla SK, Kuppusamy R, Thiayagarajan K, Bandi C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 2715-2715
  • 24 To our surprise, upon column chromatography of one of the reactions at the [3+2]-annulation stage, dienone 3a was recovered in 50% yield. This result indicated that either the Michael adduct or the Michael–aldol product is unstable to isolation.