RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2677-6012
Lessons Learned from Sepsis Microlearning Intervention
Authors
Funding This research was supported by the Center for Learning Health Systems Sciences, which is a collaboration between the University of Minnesota School of Public Health and University of Minnesota School of Medicine. The effort of Eduardo Osegueda was supported by Award Number T32HL150452 (PI: Diane Neumark-Sztainer) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NHLBI or the National Institutes of Health.

Abstract
Background
Improving early recognition and treatment of sepsis is key to decreasing patient mortality. A large academic health system implemented several quality improvement initiatives, yet monthly compliance with sepsis best practices remained low.
Objective
Develop and evaluate an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded microlearning intervention to address suboptimal adherence to sepsis care best practices.
Methods
We conducted a randomized stepped-wedge trial of our microlearning intervention with randomization done at the nursing block level. Antibiotic delay and secondary outcomes extracted from the EHR were analyzed using mixed models to account for intracluster correlation.
Results
The microlearning intervention did not reduce antibiotic delay (mean difference = 0.71 hours; p = 0.49). Despite the alert firing over 30,000 times during the study period, the microlearning intervention was viewed only a total of 30 times.
Conclusion
Our microlearning intervention did not improve sepsis care outcomes. We believe that although the content addressed key knowledge gaps, delivering the intervention through disruptive EHR alerts was not an accessible delivery channel to the nursing staff we targeted.
Keywords
sepsis - inpatient care - evidence-based medicine and nursing - inpatient - quality - quantitativeProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
The University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board deemed this study exempt from full review (Study 00014216).
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 23. Dezember 2024
Angenommen: 05. August 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. September 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Sepsis /National Institute of General Medical Sciences [Internet]. Accessed April 17, 2025 at: https://www.nigms.nih.gov/education/fact-sheets/Pages/sepsis
- 2 Mok K, Christian MD, Nelson S, Burry L. Time to administration of antibiotics among inpatients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Can J Hosp Pharm 2014; 67 (03) 213-219
- 3 Schinkel M, Nanayakkara PWB, Wiersinga WJ. Sepsis performance improvement programs: from evidence toward clinical implementation. Crit Care 2022; 26 (01) 77
- 4 Khanina A, Cairns KA, McGloughlin S. et al. Improving sepsis care for hospital inpatients using existing medical emergency response systems. Infect Dis Health 2020; 25 (02) 63-70
- 5 McDonald CM, West S, Dushenski D. et al. Sepsis now a priority: a quality improvement initiative for early sepsis recognition and care. Int J Qual Health Care 2018; 30 (10) 802-809
- 6 Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W. et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47 (11) 1181-1247
- 7 Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC. et al. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med 2017; 376 (23) 2235-2244
- 8 Usher MG, Tourani R, Webber B. et al. Patient heterogeneity and the J-curve relationship between time-to-antibiotics and the outcomes of patients admitted with bacterial infection. Crit Care Med 2022; 50 (05) 799-809
- 9 Jensen JK, Skår R, Tveit B. The impact of Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems on nurses' competence: an integrative literature review and synthesis. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27 (7-8): e1256-e1274
- 10 Kissel KA, Krewulak KD, Poulin TG. et al. Understanding ICU nursing knowledge, perceived barriers, and facilitators of sepsis recognition and management: a cross-sectional study. Crit Care Explor 2025; 7 (01) e1200
- 11 Regina J, Le Pogam MA, Niemi T. et al. Sepsis awareness and knowledge amongst nurses, physicians and paramedics of a tertiary care center in Switzerland: a survey-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2023; 18 (06) e0285151
- 12 Oermann MH, Frank B, Phillips BC. et al. Teaching in Nursing and Role of the Educator. 2nd ed.. 2018. Springer Publishing Company LLC; New York, NY:
- 13 Buchem I, Hamelmann H. Microlearning: a strategy for ongoing professional development. eLearning Papers 2010; 21 (07) 1-15
- 14 De Gagne JC, Park HK, Hall K, Woodward A, Yamane S, Kim SS. Microlearning in health professions education: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ 2019; 5 (02) e13997
- 15 Torabi Khah M, Farsi Z, Sajadi SA. Comparing the effects of mHealth application based on micro-learning method and face-to-face training on treatment adherence and perception in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13 (06) e071982
- 16 Cheng YT, Liu DR, Wang VJ. Teaching splinting techniques using a just-in-time training instructional video. Pediatr Emerg Care 2017; 33 (03) 166-170
- 17 Chakraborty RK, Burns B. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. . Accessed April 17, 2025 at: https://web.archive.org/web/20250204105529/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547669/
- 18 Hooper R, Teerenstra S, de Hoop E, Eldridge S. Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials. Stat Med 2016; 35 (26) 4718-4728
- 19 Sharma N, Schwendimann R, Endrich O, Ausserhofer D, Simon M. Comparing Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices with different weightings to predict in-hospital mortality: an analysis of national inpatient data. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21 (01) 13
- 20 Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998; 36 (01) 8-27
- 21 Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2007; 28 (02) 182-191
- 22 Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 2015; 67: 1-48
- 23 Todd B, Shinthia N, Nierenberg L, Mansour L, Miller M, Otero R. Impact of electronic medical record alerts on emergency physician workflow and medical management. J Emerg Med 2021; 60 (03) 390-395
- 24 Elias P, Peterson E, Wachter B, Ward C, Poon E, Navar AM. Evaluating the impact of interruptive alerts within a health system: use, response time, and cumulative time burden. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (05) 909-917
- 25 Bedoya AD, Clement ME, Phelan M, Steorts RC, O'Brien C, Goldstein BA. Minimal impact of implemented early warning score and best practice alert for patient deterioration. Crit Care Med 2019; 47 (01) 49-55
- 26 Wang C, Xu R, Zeng Y, Zhao Y, Hu X. A comparison of qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS in predicting the accuracy of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17 (04) e0266755
- 27 Mathison S. Encyclopedia of Evaluation [Internet]. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2005 . Accessed July 19, 2025 at: https://methods.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/encyclopedia-of-evaluation/toc
- 28 Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R. et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 2011; 38 (02) 65-76