Evolution of an Electronic Health Record-Based Alert to Optimize Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis

Abstract

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized patients must balance risks of bleeding and thrombosis. Clinical changes such as bleeding or renal injury can also trigger changes or delays in thromboprophylaxis. Electronic health record alerts (EHRAs) can allow for targeted notification to providers to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes at the risk of alert fatigue if not carefully designed and implemented.

Objective

This study aimed to develop and refine an EHRA that minimizes nuisance alerts while facilitating appropriate ordering of VTE prophylaxis for medical patients.

Methods

A multidisciplinary group at a single large safety-net academic medical center developed an EHRA to identify patients at increased thrombosis risk, but without orders for VTE prophylaxis. This was refined over four phases: development and validation, initial monitoring and exclusion criteria adjustment, COVID-19-related modifications, and delayed surveillance and modification. Data analysis evaluated criteria including alert frequency, alert action/utilization, and alert duration.

Results

The EHRA fired an average of 33.3 times per day across all phases of the study. Phase 1 of EHRA implementation showed significantly increased alerts per patient (6.4 to 43.3 alerts per day, p < 0.01) as well as the percentage of patients with >5 alerts (2.8 to 60.0%, p < 0.01). Modifications in phase 2 and phase 3 increased alert rates without any significant effect on subsequent action taken by a provider. Phase 4 modifications led to a significant reduction in alert frequency (44.1 to 14.9 alerts per day, p < 0.01) coupled with a notable increase in provider action (0.24 to 7.73%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

This multidisciplinary, provider-centered, intervention improved alert appearance, and information needed to guide providers increased provider engagement 32-fold, with a 3-fold decrease in alert frequency. Despite improvements, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of this alert is important.

Keywords

clinical decision support (CDS) - venous thromboembolism (VTE) - prophylaxis - best practice advisory - electronic health record - electronic health record alert (EHRA)

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

No human subjects were involved in this project.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 23. Januar 2025

Angenommen: 30. Juli 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
31. Juli 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. September 2025

• References

• 1 Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V. et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (11) 2450-2457
• 2 Mahan CE, Spyropoulos AC. Venous thromboembolism prevention: a systematic review of methods to improve prophylaxis and decrease events in the hospitalized patient. Hosp Pract 2010; 38 (01) 97-108
• 3 Haut ER, Owodunni OP, Wang J. et al. Alert-triggered patient education versus nurse feedback for nonadministered venous thromboembolism prophylaxis doses: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11 (18) e027119
• 4 Piazza G, Rosenbaum EJ, Pendergast W. et al. Physician alerts to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. Circulation 2009; 119 (16) 2196-2201
• 5 Woller SC, Stevens SM, Evans RS. et al. Electronic alerts, comparative practitioner metrics, and education improves thromboprophylaxis and reduces thrombosis. Am J Med 2016; 129 (10) 1124.e17-1124.e26
• 6 Mitchell JD, Collen JF, Petteys S, Holley AB. A simple reminder system improves venous thromboembolism prophylaxis rates and reduces thrombotic events for hospitalized patients1. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10 (02) 236-243
• 7 Beeler PE, Eschmann E, Schumacher A, Studt JD, Amann-Vesti B, Blaser J. Impact of electronic reminders on venous thromboprophylaxis after admissions and transfers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (e2): e297-e303
• 8 McGreevey III JD, Mallozzi CP, Perkins RM, Shelov E, Schreiber R. Reducing alert burden in electronic health records: state of the art recommendations from four health systems. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (01) 1-12
• 9 Murad DA, Tsugawa Y, Elashoff DA, Baldwin KM, Bell DS. Distinct components of alert fatigue in physicians' responses to a noninterruptive clinical decision support alert. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 30 (01) 64-72
• 10 Elias P, Peterson E, Wachter B, Ward C, Poon E, Navar AM. Evaluating the impact of interruptive alerts within a health system: use, response time, and cumulative time burden. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (05) 909-917
• 11 Hussain MI, Reynolds TL, Zheng K. Medication safety alert fatigue may be reduced via interaction design and clinical role tailoring: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (10) 1141-1149
• 12 Sirajuddin AM, Osheroff JA, Sittig DF, Chuo J, Velasco F, Collins DA. Implementation pearls from a new guidebook on improving medication use and outcomes with clinical decision support. Effective CDS is essential for addressing healthcare performance improvement imperatives. J Healthc Inf Manag 2009; 23 (04) 38-45
• 13 Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S. et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10 (06) 523-530