Ambient Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Oncology: Adoption, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Appropriateness

Abstract

Objectives

Hospitals are looking to AI and other innovative applications to help alleviate provider burden and dissatisfaction associated with clinical documentation in oncology. Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes are a promising technology to address these issues. However, they generally have not been optimized for oncology. This study aimed to evaluate an ambient AI scribe application with oncology providers to determine opportunities and potential challenges.

Methods

This prospective pilot study of a scribe application was conducted over 4 months at a high-volume cancer center in New York City. Qualitative (interviews) and quantitative (surveys and utilization) data were collected to assess adoption, feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. The analysis included descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis.

Results

Thirty-one providers were included across oncology specialties. Twenty-five providers used the application at least once; of these, 18 completed a survey and 21 completed an interview. Providers used the application in 620 (13.9%) out of 4,449 in-person outpatient visits. Out of 18 survey respondents, 17 (94%) indicated they used the AI-drafted content at least sometimes, demonstrating feasibility. For acceptability, 11 (61%) indicated a moderate, strong, or very strong desire for continued access to the technology. All providers interviewed advocated for continued investment in ambient technology. Metrics around appropriateness showed variability based on its accuracy in capturing complex clinical scenarios and in the types of patients the technology was used with. For example, providers used the technology for 21.1% of new visits but only 12.2% of follow-up visits.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the potential for ambient AI scribes to be useful in oncology. Future research should evaluate the use of this technology at scale as it may realize workflow efficiencies and improve the clinical documentation process.

Keywords

ambient assistant technologies - documentation burden - burnout - artificial intelligence - clinical documentation

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was reviewed and determined to be exempt by the MSK IRB.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 28. April 2025

Angenommen: 21. Juli 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. September 2025

• References

• 1 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: CMS Unveils Major Organizational Change to Reduce Provider and Provider Burden and Improve Patient Outcomes. 202
• 2 Tajirian T, Stergiopoulos V, Strudwick G. et al. The influence of electronic health record use on physician burnout: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (07) e19274
• 3 Health Level Seven (HL7) International: Reducing Provider Burden (RCB) Project. 2023
• 4 Mishra P, Kiang JC, Grant RW. Association of medical scribes in primary care with physician workflow and patient experience. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178 (11) 1467-1472
• 5 Khullar D. Burnout, professionalism, and the quality of US health care. JAMA Health Forum 2023; 4 (03) e230024
• 6 Sloss EA, Abdul S, Aboagyewah MA. et al. Toward alleviating clinician documentation burden: a scoping review of burden reduction efforts. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (03) 446-455
• 7 Tierney AA, Gayre G, Hoberman B. et al. Ambient artificial intelligence scribes to alleviate the burden of clinical documentation. NEJM Catal 2024; 5 (03) 0404
• 8 Cao DY, Silkey JR, Decker MC, Wanat KA. Artificial intelligence-driven digital scribes in clinical documentation: pilot study assessing the impact on dermatologist workflow and patient encounters. JAAD Int 2024; 15: 149-151
• 9 Shah SJ, Devon-Sand A, Ma SP. et al. Ambient artificial intelligence scribes: physician burnout and perspectives on usability and documentation burden. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2025; 32 (02) 375-380
• 10 Hassan H, Zipursky AR, Rabbani N. et al. Special topic on burnout: clinical implementation of artificial intelligence scribes in healthcare: a systematic review. Appl Clin Inform 2025;
• 11 Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R. et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 2011; 38 (02) 65-76
• 12 Rouder J, Saucier O, Kinder R. et al. What to do with all those open-ended responses? Data visualization techniques for survey researchers. Surv Pract 2021; 14 (01) 1-9
• 13 Rabbani N, Ray M, Verhagen E, Hatoun J, Patane L, Vernacchio L. Special topic burnout: ambient artificial intelligence scribes in pediatric primary care: a mixed methods study. Appl Clin Inform 2025;
• 14 Stevens AF, Stetson P. Theory of trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence technology (TrAAIT): an instrument to assess clinician trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence. J Biomed Inform 2023; 148: 104550