Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2620-3147
Typing Proficiency among Physicians in Internal Medicine: A Pilot Study of Speed and Performance
Authors
Funding This study was supported by a research grant from the SGAIM Foundation.

Abstract
Background
Electronic health records (EHRs) are widely implemented and consume nearly half of physicians' work time. Despite the importance of efficient data entry, physicians' typing skills—potential contributors to documentation burden—remain poorly studied.
Objective
This study aims to evaluate the typing skills of physicians and their associations with demographic characteristics and professional roles.
Methods
This cross-sectional pilot study included a convenience sample of physicians (residents, chief residents, and attending physicians) from the internal medicine division of an academic hospital. Participants completed a 1-minute typing test under supervised conditions. The primary outcome was raw typing speed, measured in words per minute (WPM). The secondary outcome was a performance score calculated by subtracting 50 points for each error from the total number of characters typed per minute.
Results
Participation rate was 100% (82/82 physicians). The mean age was 33.7 ± 7.3 years; 7.2 ± 7.1 years since graduation; and 45.1% female. The mean typing speed was 53.4 WPM (range: 31–91 WPM), with 57.3% (47/82) of participants exceeding 50 WPM, a threshold commonly considered professional. Bivariate analysis showed a significant negative association with age (Spearman's ρ = −0.281, p = 0.011), which was not sustained in the multivariable analysis. No significant association was observed with sex, country of diploma, or role. Upon multivariable analysis, performance score showed a significant negative association with age (β = −17.724, p = 0.009) but a positive association with years since graduation (β = 16.850, p = 0.021), suggesting a generation- and experience-related interaction.
Conclusion
Nearly half of physicians exhibited professional-level typing skills, yet overall performance varied widely and was influenced by both generational factors and clinical experience. Given that documentation burden affects clinicians across all skill levels, both individual and systemic strategies—such as improved EHR design and alternative input methods—should be explored.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
As the research focus involves typing performance and does not entail clinical intervention or access to sensitive patient information, the study is not subject to the Swiss Human Research Act (HRA). The local ethics commission confirmed that no formal ethical approval or informed consent was required. All participants were fully informed of the study's objectives, and their data were anonymized prior to analysis to ensure confidentiality.
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Publication History
Received: 18 November 2024
Accepted: 20 May 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
26 May 2025
Article published online:
17 October 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L. et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172 (18) 1377-1385
- 2 Kroth PJ, Morioka-Douglas N, Veres S. et al. Association of electronic health record design and use factors with clinician stress and burnout. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (08) e199609
- 3 Li C, Parpia C, Sriharan A, Keefe DT. Electronic medical record-related burnout in healthcare providers: a scoping review of outcomes and interventions. BMJ Open 2022; 12 (08) e060865
- 4 Budd J. Burnout related to electronic health record use in primary care. J Prim Care Community Health 2023 ;14:21501319231166921
- 5 Alobayli F, O'Connor S, Holloway A, Cresswell K. Electronic health record stress and burnout among clinicians in hospital settings: A systematic review. Digit Health 2023 ;9:20552076231220241
- 6 Muhiyaddin R, Elfadl A, Mohamed E. et al. Electronic health records and physician burnout: A scoping review. Stud Health Technol Inform 2022; 289: 481-484
- 7 Wu Y, Wu M, Wang C, Lin J, Liu J, Liu S. Evaluating the prevalence of burnout among health care professionals related to electronic health record use: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Med Inform 2024; 12: e54811
- 8 Kroth PJ, Morioka-Douglas N, Veres S. et al. The electronic elephant in the room: Physicians and the electronic health record. JAMIA Open 2018; 1 (01) 49-56
- 9 Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C. et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91 (07) 836-848
- 10 Friedberg MW, Chen PG, Van Busum KR. et al. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. Rand Health Q 2014; 3 (04) 1
- 11 Wang JK, Ouyang D, Hom J, Chi J, Chen JH. Characterizing electronic health record usage patterns of inpatient medicine residents using event log data. PLoS ONE 2019; 14 (02) e0205379
- 12 Chen L, Guo U, Illipparambil LC. et al. Racing against the clock: Internal medicine residents' time spent on electronic health records. J Grad Med Educ 2016; 8 (01) 39-44
- 13 Fletcher KE, Visotcky AM, Slagle JM, Tarima S, Weinger MB, Schapira MM. The composition of intern work while on call. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27 (11) 1432-1437
- 14 Wenger N, Méan M, Castioni J, Marques-Vidal P, Waeber G, Garnier A. Allocation of internal medicine resident time in a Swiss hospital: A time and motion study of day and evening shifts. Ann Intern Med 2017; 166 (08) 579-586
- 15 Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD. et al. Tethered to the EHR: Primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med 2017; 15 (05) 419-426
- 16 King J, Patel V, Jamoom EW, Furukawa MF. Clinical benefits of electronic health record use: National findings. Health Serv Res 2014; 49 (1 Pt 2): 392-404
- 17 Gardner RL, Cooper E, Haskell J. et al. Physician stress and burnout: The impact of health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (02) 106-114
- 18 Overhage JM, Qeadan F, Choi EHE, Vos D, Kroth PJ. Explaining variability in electronic health record effort in primary care ambulatory encounters. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (02) 212-219
- 19 Nottrodt J. What is a good WPM for typing? The Predictive Index. January 28, 2025
- 20 Dhakal V, Feit AM, Kristensson PO, Oulasvirta A. Observations on Typing from 136 Million Keystrokes. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2018 ; Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 21 Kaushik A. What is a Good Typing Speed for Employees & Why? WECP. January 28, 2025. Accessed May 30, 2025 at: https://www.wecreateproblems.com/blog/good-typing-speed#heading-3
- 22 Digital Literacy Inc. Typing skills certificate. Accessed March 27, 2025. Accessed May 30, 2025 at: https://www.ecdl.ch/en/typing/
- 23 Kalava A, Ravindranath S, Bronshteyn I, Munjal RS, Schianodicola J, Yarmush JM. Typing skills of physicians in training. J Grad Med Educ 2014; 6 (01) 155-157
- 24 Schuurman AR, Baarsma ME, Wiersinga WJ, Hovius JW. Digital disparities among healthcare workers in typing speed between generations, genders, and medical specialties: Cross-sectional study. BMJ 2022; 379: e072784
- 25 Céline B, Matteo M, Michael S. et al. Running against the clock: a qualitative study of internal medicine residents' work experience. Swiss Med Wkly 2022; 152: w30216
- 26 West CP. The paradox of burnout from physicians' most meaningful roles. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (12) e2452106-e2452106
- 27 Kang C, Sarkar IN. Interventions to reduce electronic health record-related burnout: A systematic review. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (01) 10-25
- 28 Misurac J, Knake LA, Blum JM. The effect of ambient artificial intelligence notes on provider burnout. Appl Clin Inform 2025; 16 (02) 252-258
- 29 Kumah-Crystal YA, Pirtle CJ, Whyte HM, Goode ES, Anders SH, Lehmann CU. Electronic health record interactions through voice: A review. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (03) 541-552
- 30 Stanford Medicine ǀ The Harris Poll. How Doctors Feel about Electronic Health Records. Accessed May 30, 2025 at: https://med.stanford.edu/content/dam/sm/ehr/documents/EHR-Poll-Presentation.pdf
- 31 Shah S, Bedgood M, Devon-Sand A. et al. Effect of an electronic health record-based intervention on documentation practices. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (04) 771-777
