Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2595-4849
A Rash Decision: Implementing an EHR-Integrated Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Protocol without Adequate Clinician Support
Funding This study was supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health (grant no.: T32 AI106688).

Abstract
Background
Approximately 10% of patients have a documented penicillin “allergy”; however, up to 95% have subsequent negative testing. These patients may receive suboptimal antibiotics, leading to longer hospitalizations and higher costs, rates of resistant and nosocomial infections, and all-cause mortality. To mitigate these risks in children, we implemented an inpatient penicillin allergy delabeling protocol and integrated it into the electronic health record (EHR) through a mixed methods approach of clinical decision support (CDS).
Objectives
We describe our protocol implementation across three sequential phases: “Pilot,” “Active Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP),” and “Mixed CDS.” We highlight several potential pitfalls that may have contributed to poor clinician adoption.
Methods
Patients were risk-stratified as nonallergic, low-risk, or high-risk based on history. Process measures included: evaluation rate, oral challenge rate for low-risk, and allergy referral rate for high- or low-risk when oral challenge was deferred. The primary outcome measure was the penicillin allergy delabeling rate among low-risk or nonallergic. Balancing measures included the rate of epinephrine or antihistamine administrations.
Results
The pilot and ASP phases used clinician education and an order set, but were mostly manual processes. The mixed CDS phase introduced interruptive alerts, dynamic text in note templates, and patient list columns to guide clinicians, but little education was provided. The mixed CDS phase had the lowest evaluation rate compared with the pilot and active ASP phases (6.4 vs. 25 vs. 15%). However, when the evaluation was performed, the mixed CDS phase had the highest oral challenge rate (33 vs. 26 vs. 13%) and delabeling rate (43 vs. 33 vs. 27%). No adverse events occurred.
Conclusion
CDS tools improve clinician decision-making and optimize patient care. However, relying on CDS for complex clinical evaluations can lead to failure when clinicians cannot find the tool or appreciate its importance. Person-to-person communication can be vital in establishing a process and educating intended users for successful CDS implementation.
Keywords
clinical decision support - penicillin allergy delabeling - pediatrics - antimicrobial stewardshipProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
This study was reviewed by the Washington University in St. Louis Human Research Protection Office and was determined to not involve activities that are subject to Institutional Review Board oversight.
Publication History
Received: 09 December 2024
Accepted: 26 April 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
28 April 2025
Article published online:
12 September 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Shenoy ES, Macy E, Rowe T, Blumenthal KG. Evaluation and management of penicillin allergy: a review. JAMA 2019; 321 (02) 188-199
- 2 Sacco KA, Bates A, Brigham TJ, Imam JS, Burton MC. Clinical outcomes following inpatient penicillin allergy testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2017; 72 (09) 1288-1296
- 3 DesBiens M, Scalia P, Ravikumar S. et al. A closer look at penicillin allergy history: systematic review and meta-analysis of tolerance to drug challenge. Am J Med 2020; 133 (04) 452-462.e4
- 4 Caubet JC, Kaiser L, Lemaître B, Fellay B, Gervaix A, Eigenmann PA. The role of penicillin in benign skin rashes in childhood: a prospective study based on drug rechallenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127 (01) 218-222
- 5 Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ. Antibiotic allergy. Lancet 2019; 393 (10167): 183-198
- 6 West RM, Smith CJ, Pavitt SH. et al. ‘Warning: allergic to penicillin’: association between penicillin allergy status in 2.3 million NHS general practice electronic health records, antibiotic prescribing and health outcomes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74 (07) 2075-2082
- 7 Krah NM, Jones TW, Lake J, Hersh AL. The impact of antibiotic allergy labels on antibiotic exposure, clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs: a systematic review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021; 42 (05) 530-548
- 8 Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG. et al; Chief Editor(s), Workgroup Contributors, Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters Reviewers. Drug allergy: a 2022 practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 150 (06) 1333-1393
- 9 Antoon JW, Grijalva CG, Grisso AG. et al. Feasibility of a centralized, pharmacy-led penicillin allergy delabeling program. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12 (07) e230-e237
- 10 Bauer ME, MacBrayne C, Stein A. et al. A multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to facilitate penicillin allergy delabeling among hospitalized pediatric patients. Hosp Pediatr 2021; 11 (05) 427-434
- 11 Powell N, Elkhalifa S, Guyer A, Garcez T, Sandoe J, Zhou L. Addressing the challenges of penicillin allergy delabeling with electronic health records and mobile applications. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2023; 11 (02) 414-421
- 12 Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL. et al. Development and validation of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180 (05) 745-752
- 13 Blumenthal KG, Shenoy ES, Wolfson AR. et al. Addressing inpatient beta-lactam allergies: a multihospital implementation. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2017; 5 (03) 616-625.e7
- 14 Elkhalifa S, Bhana R, Blaga A. et al. Development and validation of a mobile clinical decision support tool for the diagnosis of drug allergy in adults: the drug allergy app. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2021; 9 (12) 4410-4418.e4
- 15 Sirajuddin AM, Osheroff JA, Sittig DF, Chuo J, Velasco F, Collins DA. Implementation pearls from a new guidebook on improving medication use and outcomes with clinical decision support. Effective CDS is essential for addressing healthcare performance improvement imperatives. J Healthc Inf Manag 2009; 23 (04) 38-45
- 16 Dolin RH, Shenvi E, Alvarez C. et al. Pillharmonics: an orchestrated pharmacogenetics medication clinical decision support service. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (02) 378-387
- 17 du Plessis T, Walls G, Jordan A, Holland DJ. Implementation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling service in a public hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74 (05) 1438-1446
- 18 Blumenthal KG, Park MA, Macy EM. Redesigning the allergy module of the electronic health record. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2016; 117 (02) 126-131