Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2564-8809
Digital Compassion Fatigue as an Emerging Phenomenon for Registered Nurses Experiencing Technostress
Funding None.

Abstract
Background
Registered nurses increasingly work in remote care and digital interaction roles, offering flexibility and expansion of their scope of practice. These roles may expose nurses to digital compassion fatigue, a phenomenon proposed to be characterized by the negative psychological and emotional impact of caring for patients remotely through the use of technology.
Objectives
The first objective of this work is to propose the phenomenon of “digital compassion fatigue” as a potentially further evolved and differentiated form of “compassion fatigue.” The second objective is to produce a comparative analysis of attributes, antecedents, and consequences through literature reviews.
Methods
An evolutionary concept analysis approach was selected as a guide for exploring, discussing, and defining the new concept of digital compassion fatigue. Concept analysis was selected given the need for a framework that accounts for the dynamic nature of technology and practice. The process of conducting a concept analysis includes consideration of diverse and multidisciplinary perspectives. As a result, those in caring, educational, and/or support service roles (e.g., social work, counseling, and teaching) for which distance suffering and technostress could feasibly be present were also included in the literature searches and reviews. Health care-specific studies often included nurses in the sample but may not have differentiated their specific insights or data points in the results.
Results
The concept analysis explored the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of digital compassion fatigue, differentiating it from its evolutionary parent, compassion fatigue. Key antecedents included technostress, distant suffering, and the unique challenges of delivering care remotely. A major confounding variable was the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have heightened or introduced new technology-related stressors or highlighted the existence of digital compassion fatigue.
Conclusion
Further defining and understanding digital compassion fatigue is crucial for developing effective strategies to support nurses who may experience it or who are at risk.
Keywords
nursing - burnout - technostress - compassion fatigue - digital compassion fatigue - distant sufferingProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
No human and/or animal subjects were involved in this project.
Publication History
Received: 16 November 2024
Accepted: 23 March 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
24 March 2025
Article published online:
30 July 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Speroni K. Remote work in nursing: Facilitators and barriers. Online J Issues Nurs 2023;28(02 Manuscript 1
- 2 Boyd C. Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1984
- 3 Bondanini G, Giorgi G, Ariza-Montes A, Vega-Muñoz A, Andreucci-Annunziata P. Technostress dark side of technology in the workplace: A scientometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 (21) 8013
- 4 Peters E. Compassion fatigue in nursing: A concept analysis. Nurs Forum 2018; 53 (04) 466-480
- 5 Cross LA. Compassion fatigue in palliative care nursing: A concept analysis. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2019; 21 (01) 21-28
- 6 Jenkins B, Warren NA. Concept analysis: compassion fatigue and effects upon critical care nurses. Crit Care Nurs Q 2012; 35 (04) 388-395
- 7 Sabery M, Tafreshi MZ, Hosseini M, Mohtashami J, Ebadi A. Compassion fatigue in clinical nurses: An evolutionary concept analysis. Adv Nurs Midwifery 2018; 27 (03) 7-14
- 8 Sorenson C, Bolick B, Wright K, Hamilton R. An evolutionary concept analysis of compassion fatigue. J Nurs Scholarsh 2017; 49 (05) 557-563
- 9 Gunawan J, Aungsuroch Y, Marzilli C. Beyond the classics: A comprehensive look at concept analysis methods in nursing education and research. Belitung Nurs J 2023; 9 (05) 406-410
- 10 Rodgers B, Knafl KA. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. 2nd ed.. Saunders; 2000
- 11 Rodgers BL, Jacelon CS, Knafl KA. Concept analysis and the advance of nursing knowledge: State of the science. J Nurs Scholarsh 2018; 50 (04) 451-459
- 12 Åhs JW, Eriksson H, Mazaheri M. Distant suffering: A concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 151: 104672
- 13 He AS, Cederbaum JA, Leake R. Transformative lessons learned from COVID-19 to reimagine child welfare work. J Public Child Welf 2023; 17 (04) 747-768
- 14 McCoyd JL, Curran L, Candelario E, Findley PA, Hennessey K. Social service providers under COVID-19 duress: adaptation, burnout, and resilience. J Soc Work (Lond) 2023; 23 (01) 85-102
- 15 Fute A, Sun B, Oubibi M. Assessing teaching compassion, work engagement and compassion fatigue among teachers during the pandemic. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2022; 15: 2561-2571
- 16 Kercher A, Rahman J, Pedersen M. The COVID-19 pandemic, psychologists' professional quality of life and mental health. Front Psychol 2024; 15: 1339869
- 17 Henson JS. Burnout or compassion fatigue: A comparison of concepts. Medsurg Nurs 2020; 29 (02) 77-95
- 18 Abbaszadeh A, Elmi A, Borhani F, Sefidkar R. The relationship between “compassion fatigue” and “burnout” among nurses. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2017; 10 (04) 869-873
- 19 Dall'Ora C, Ball J, Reinius M, Griffiths P. Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. Hum Resour Health 2020; 18 (01) 41
- 20 Serrão C, Rodrigues AR, Teixeira A, Castro L, Duarte I. The impact of teleworking in psychologists during COVID-19: Burnout, depression, anxiety, and stress. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 984691
- 21 Duffy LV, Evans R, Bennett V, Hady JM, Palaniappan P. Therapeutic relational connection in telehealth: Concept analysis. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25: e43303
- 22 Gesner E, Dykes PC, Zhang L, Gazarian P. Documentation burden in nursing and its role in clinician burnout syndrome. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (05) 983-990
- 23 Gutentag T, Asterhan CSC. Burned-out: Middle school teachers after one year of online remote teaching during COVID-19. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 802520
- 24 Geraci A, Di Domenico L, Inguglia C, D'Amico A. Teachers' emotional intelligence, burnout, work engagement, and self-efficacy during COVID-19 lockdown. Behav Sci (Basel) 2023; 13 (04) 296
- 25 Miguel C, Castro L, Marques Dos Santos JP, Serrão C, Duarte I. Impact of COVID-19 on medicine lecturers' mental health and emergency remote teaching challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 (13) 6792
- 26 Johnson E, Rainbow J. Exploration of lived experiences and measurement of burnout among US clinical research nurses. J Nurs Adm 2023; 53 (05) 251-258
- 27 Mueller R, Schindewolf E, Williams S, Jay Kessler L. ‘Steep learning curves’ to ‘Smooth Sailing’: A reappraisal of telegenetics amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. J Genet Couns 2021; 30 (04) 1010-1023
- 28 Sims H, Alvarez C, Grant K, Walczak J, Cooper LA, Ibe CA. Frontline healthcare workers experiences and challenges with in-person and remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 983414
- 29 Weng SS. Social workers' experiences in integrated health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Soc Work (Lond) 2022; 22 (06) 1431-1446
- 30 Miller JJ, Grise-Owens E. The impact of COVID-19 on social workers: An assessment of peritraumatic distress. J Soc Work (Lond) 2022; 22 (03) 674-691
- 31 Joo JY. Nurse-led telehealth interventions during COVID-19: A scoping review. Comput Inform Nurs 2022; 40 (12) 804-813
- 32 Bingham JM, Rossi MA, Truong HA. Addressing the need for a telehealth readiness assessment tool as a digital health strategy. J Am Pharm Assoc 2022; 62 (05) 1524-1527
- 33 Brod C. Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Minotavros Books. www.bibliopolis.com . Accessed October 20, 2024 at: https://www.minotavrosbooks.com/pages/books/010713/craig-brod/technostress-the-human-cost-of-the-computer-revolution
- 34 Lucena JCR, Carvalho C, Santos-Costa P, Mónico L, Parreira P. Nurses' strategies to prevent and/or decrease work-related technostress: A scoping review. Comput Inform Nurs 2021; 39 (12) 916-920
- 35 Golz C, Peter KA, Zwakhalen SMG, Hahn S. Technostress among health professionals - A multilevel model and group comparisons between settings and professions. Inform Health Soc Care 2021; 46 (02) 136-147
- 36 Abuatiq A. Concept analysis of technostress in nursing. Int J Nurs Clin Pract 2015; 2: 110
- 37 Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan BS, Ragu-Nathan TS. The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. J Manage Inf Syst 2007; 24 (01) 301-328
- 38 Kot P. Technostress and counterproductive behaviours in an organisation. Tech Soc Sci J 2022; 27: 481-491
- 39 Kemp J, Zhang T, Inglis F. et al. Delivery of compassionate mental health care in a digital technology-driven age: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (03) e16263
- 40 Diaz MJ. Positive Effects of Trauma Work: Vicarious Resilience of Child Abuse Crisis Counselors Before and During The COVID-19 Pandemic. 2022
- 41 Ferreira PDC, Barros A, Pereira N, Marques Pinto A, Veiga Simão AM. How presenteeism shaped teacher burnout in cyberbullying among students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 745252
- 42 Cavallari M, Garza JL, Charamut NR. et al. Impact of work schedule characteristics on teacher mental health and burnout symptoms while remote working. Am J Ind Med 2023; 66: 884-896
- 43 Garvick S, Peacock B, Gillette C. COVID-19 and physician assistant faculty burnout: A year into the pandemic. J Physician Assist Educ 2022; 33 (02) 135-138
- 44 Anderson E, Rinne ST, Orlander JD, Cutrona SL, Strymish JL, Vimalananda VG. Electronic consultations and economies of scale: a qualitative study of clinician perspectives on scaling up e-consult delivery. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (10) 2165-2175
- 45 Ayyala RS, Baird G, Bloom DA, McDaniel JD, Lampl B. Evaluation of stress and anxiety caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51 (09) 1589-1596
- 46 Bornheimer LA, Li Verdugo J, Holzworth J, Smith FN, Himle JA. Mental health provider perspectives of the COVID-19 pandemic impact on service delivery: a focus on challenges in remote engagement, suicide risk assessment, and treatment of psychosis. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22 (01) 718
- 47 Gostic N, Groepper D, Trinkle-Tucker M, Johnson M, Niendorf KB. An examination of psychosocial and professional effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2024; 33 (02) 269-280
- 48 Hoffman KE, Garner D, Koong AC, Woodward WA. Understanding the intersection of working from home and burnout to optimize post-COVID19 work arrangements in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108 (02) 370-373
- 49 Jimenez-Gomez C, Sawhney G, Albert KM. Impact of COVID-19 on the Applied Behavior Analysis Workforce: Comparison across remote and nonremote workers. Behav Anal Pract 2021; 14 (04) 873-882
- 50 Kasemy ZA, Sharif AF, Barakat AM. et al. Technostress creators and outcomes among egyptian medical staff and students: A multicenter cross-sectional study of remote working environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 796321
- 51 Kissler K, Thumm EB, Smith DC. et al. Perinatal telehealth: Meeting patients where they are. J Midwifery Womens Health 2024; 69 (01) 9-16
- 52 Liberati E, Richards N, Willars J. et al. A qualitative study of experiences of NHS mental healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21 (01) 250
- 53 Magon H, Smith J, Besson J. et al. Adapting to change: exploring perceptions and demands of the coronavirus (COVID-19) workforce changes - an Australian multi-institutional radiation oncology survey. Aust Health Rev 2024; 48 (04) 388-395
- 54 Rosa WE, Lynch KA, Hadler RA, Mahoney C, Parker PA. “It Took Away and Stripped a Part of Myself”: Clinician distress and recommendations for future telepalliative care delivery in the cancer context. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2023; 40 (02) 235-243
- 55 Sakumoto M, Knees M, Rogers K. et al. Virtual hospital care development and deployment: A rapid qualitative study of frontline clinicians and leaders. J Hosp Med 2024; 19 (08) 685-692
- 56 Shih KK, Anderson AE, Brown J. et al. Stay home, work safe: Attitudes and beliefs of members of a department of palliative care, rehabilitation, and integrative medicine regarding remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Palliat Med 2022; 25 (05) 757-767
- 57 Zacay G, Adler L, Schonmann Y. et al. “A day in the life” - telemedicine in family medicine and its relationship with practicing physicians' satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. Isr J Health Policy Res 2024; 13 (01) 33
- 58 Weaver K, Mitcham C. Nursing concept analysis in North America: state of the art. Nurs Philos 2008; 9 (03) 180-194
- 59 Califf C, Sarker S, Sarker S, Fitzgerald C. The Bright and Dark Sides of Technostress: An Empirical Study of Healthcare Workers. Paper presented at: Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, TX; 2015, December 13-16
- 60 Ali S, Kleib M, Paul P, Petrovskaya O, Kennedy M. Compassionate nursing care and the use of digital health technologies: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud 2022; 127: 104161
- 61 Gualano MR, Santoro PE, Borrelli I. et al. TElewoRk-RelAted Stress (TERRA), Psychological and physical strain of working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Workplace Health Saf 2023; 71 (02) 58-67
- 62 Myronuk L. Effect of telemedicine via videoconference on provider fatigue and empathy: Implications for the Quadruple Aim. Healthc Manage Forum 2022; 35 (03) 174-178
- 63 Garnett A, Hui L, Oleynikov C, Boamah S. Compassion fatigue in healthcare providers: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23 (01) 1336
- 64 Nowrouzi-Kia B, Haritos AM, Long BS. et al. Remote work transition amidst COVID-19: Impacts on presenteeism, absenteeism, and worker well-being-A scoping review. PLoS ONE 2024; 19 (07) e0307087
- 65 Howland C, Despins L, Sindt J, Wakefield B, Mehr DR. Primary care clinic nurse activities with a telehealth monitoring system. West J Nurs Res 2020; 43 (01) 5-12
- 66 Roussel LA. On-the-go strategies to enhance resilience and self-care: Using technology to create healthy work cultures. Nurs Clin North Am 2022; 57 (04) 501-512
- 67 Baxter SL, Longhurst CA, Millen M, Sitapati AM, Tai-Seale M. Generative artificial intelligence responses to patient messages in the electronic health record: early lessons learned. JAMIA Open 2024; 7 (02) ooae028
- 68 Kilponen K, Huhtala M, Kinnunen U, Mauno S, Feldt T. Illegitimate tasks in health care: Illegitimate task types and associations with occupational well-being. J Clin Nurs 2021; 30 (13-14): 2093-2106
- 69 Tai-Seale M, Dillon EC, Yang Y. et al. Physicians' well-being linked to in-basket messages generated by algorithms in electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019; 38 (07) 1073-1078
- 70 Garcia P, Ma SP, Shah S. et al. Artificial intelligence-generated draft replies to patient inbox messages. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (03) e243201
- 71 Small WR, Wiesenfeld B, Brandfield-Harvey B. et al. Large language model-based responses to patients' in-basket messages. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (07) e2422399
- 72 Pavuluri S, Sangal R, Sather J, Taylor RA. Balancing act: the complex role of artificial intelligence in addressing burnout and healthcare workforce dynamics. BMJ Health Care Inform 2024; 31 (01) e101120