Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2025; 16(02): 447-462
DOI: 10.1055/a-2516-1757
Research Article

Assessing the Effect of a Mobile Application on Cancer Risk Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study Design

Philippe Westerlinck
1   Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
,
Nathalie Maes
2   Biostatistics and Research Method Center, CHU of Liège/University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
,
Philippe Coucke
1   Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The “cancer risk calculator” mobile application aims to inform patients about their personal risks of cancer and the risk factors influencing said risks. The present analysis examines the responses to a questionnaire submitted by oncology patients treated with radiotherapy or their family members.

Objective The primary objective was to determine the effect of the app on the user's awareness and potential habit changes related to cancer risk. Further, the study aimed to discern any relationships between respondent characteristics and their questionnaire responses.

Methods A total of 162 patients were included in the analysis. Each patient's dataset comprised gender, date of birth, entry date, respondent type, type of cancer, and responses to 12 application-related questions. Statistical methods such as multiple regression models were employed to identify any effects of the respondent's characteristics on their responses. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results Responding to the survey questions, 67.1% of respondents found the application useful, and 63.4% reported learning something new. More than half (52.5%) indicated a willingness to change their habits based on the information provided. Respondents also indicated that they were surprised by the number of risk factors shaping their risks and the large influence of some of these risk factors. Variables such as breast cancer diagnosis (p = 0.044) and age (p = 0.049) influenced specific question responses.

Conclusion The “cancer risk calculator” app appears to have a significant utility in educating its users about cancer risk and potentially influencing habit change.

Keywords

cancer risk calculator - patient education - habit change - mobile application - cancer awareness - health literacy

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

All subjects signed an informed consent, as approved by the ethical committee of the CHU de Liège.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 14 November 2024

Accepted: 13 January 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
15 January 2025

Article published online:
21 May 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization. . Cancer. Accessed 2022 at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer
    PubMed
  • 2 Thiengwittayaporn S, Wattanapreechanon P, Sakon P. et al. Development of a mobile application to improve exercise accuracy and quality of life in knee osteoarthritis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143 (02) 729-738
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Buller DB, Borland R, Bettinghaus EP, Shane JH, Zimmerman DE. Randomized trial of a smartphone mobile application compared to text messaging to support smoking cessation. Telemed J E Health 2014; 20 (03) 206-214
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Al Ansari FS, Alfayez A, Alsalman D. et al. Using mobile health applications to enhance physical activity in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study on users' perceptions. Int Health 2023; 15 (01) 47-55
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Berntsen E, Babic A. Cherry: mobile application for children with cancer. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013; 192: 1168
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Graetz I, Hu X, Curry AN, Robles A, Vidal GA, Schwartzberg LS. Mobile application to support oncology patients during treatment on patient outcomes: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Med 2023; 12 (05) 6190-6199
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Gopichandran L, Garg R, Chalga MS, Joshi P, Dhandapani M, Bhatnagar S. Development of mobile application-based system for improving medication adherence among cancer patients receiving palliative therapy. Indian J Palliat Care 2023; 29 (01) 51-56
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Ruco A, Dossa F, Tinmouth J. et al. Social media and mHealth technology for cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23 (07) e26759
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Lamb LR, Baird GL, Roy IT, Choi PHS, Lehman CD, Miles RC. Are English-language online patient education materials related to breast cancer risk assessment understandable, readable, and actionable?. Breast 2022; 61: 29-34
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Ahmed HG, Abboh EAA, Alnajib AMA. et al. Shared thoughts and practices on some modifiable cancer risk factors. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2023; 27 (08) 3612-3621
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Westerlinck P, Coucke P, Albert A. Development of a cancer risk model and mobile health application to inform the public about cancer risks and risk factors. Int J Med Inform 2024; 189: 105503
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 National Cancer Institute. [Online]. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Accessed 2021 at: https://seer.cancer.gov/
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Online]. National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). Accessed 2021 at: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Food and Drug Administration [Online]. Mobile Medical Applications. Accessed 2021 at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/mobile-medical-applications
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant A, Greer DS. Advancing Health Literacy: A Framework for Understanding and Action. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2012
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 CDC. Health Literacy. Accessed 2020 at https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Institute of Medicine. Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, and Roundtable on Health Literacy, Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. https://doi.org/10.17226/12474
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155 (02) 97-107
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Westerlinck P, Coucke P. Review of interactive digital solutions improving health literacy of personal cancer risks in the general public. Int J Med Inform 2021; 154: 104564
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Galvin AM, Garg A, Griner SB, Moore JD, Thompson EL. Health literacy correlates to HPV vaccination among us adults ages 27–45. J Cancer Educ 2023; 38 (01) 349-356
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Poon PKM, Tam KW, Lam T. et al. Poor health literacy associated with stronger perceived barriers to breast cancer screening and overestimated breast cancer risk. Front Oncol 2023; 12: 1053698
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gansler T, Henley SJ, Stein K, Nehl EJ, Smigal C, Slaughter E. Sociodemographic determinants of cancer treatment health literacy. Cancer 2005; 104 (03) 653-660
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Di Tosto G, Walker DM, Sieck CJ. et al. Examining the relationship between health literacy, health numeracy, and patient portal use. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (03) 692-699
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Zhang L, Jiang S. Examining the role of information behavior in linking cancer risk perception and cancer worry to cancer fatalism in China: cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26: e49383
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Silva BMC, Rodrigues JJPC, de la Torre Díez I, López-Coronado M, Saleem K. Mobile-health: a review of current state in 2015. J Biomed Inform 2015; 56: 265-272
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Rathbone AL, Prescott J. The use of mobile apps and sms messaging as physical and mental health interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (08) e295
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Payne HE, Lister C, West JH, Bernhardt JM. Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR mHealth Uhealth 2015; 3 (01) e20
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Jang I. A systematic review on mobile health applications' education program for patients taking oral anticoagulants. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 (17) 8902
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG. et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (06) 557-565
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Klasnja P, Pratt W. Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform 2012; 45 (01) 184-198
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Duman-Lubberding S, van Uden-Kraan CF, Jansen F. et al. Feasibility of an ehealth application “oncokompas” to improve personalized survivorship cancer care. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24 (05) 2163-2171
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Mirkovic J, Kaufman DR, Ruland CM. Supporting cancer patients in illness management: usability evaluation of a mobile app. JMIR mHealth Uhealth 2014; 2 (03) e33
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Lana A, Faya-Ornia G, López ML. Impact of a web-based intervention supplemented with text messages to improve cancer prevention behaviors among adolescents: results from a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2014; 59: 54-59
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Martin CK, Miller AC, Thomas DM, Champagne CM, Han H, Church T. Efficacy of smartloss, a smartphone-based weight loss intervention: results from a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015; 23 (05) 935-942
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Salmani H, Ahmadi M, Shahrokhi N. The impact of mobile health on cancer screening: a systematic review. Cancer Inform 2020; 19: 1176935120954191
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, Kannel WB. An updated coronary risk profile. a statement for health professionals. Circulation 1991; 83 (01) 356-362
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Eichler K, Puhan MA, Steurer J, Bachmann LM. Prediction of first coronary events with the Framingham score: a systematic review. Am Heart J 2007; 153 (05) 722-731 , 731.e1–731.e8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP. et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 81 (24) 1879-1886
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 “Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool,” Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. Accessed June 22, 2023 at: https://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool
    PubMed
  • 40 Vaffis S, Whaley S, Axon DR. et al. Features of cancer mHealth apps and evidence for patient preferences: scoping literature review. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9: e37330
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Richards R, Kinnersley P, Brain K, McCutchan G, Staffurth J, Wood F. Use of mobile devices to help cancer patients meet their information needs in non-inpatient settings: systematic review. JMIR mHealth Uhealth 2018; 6 (12) e10026
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Lee M, Lee H, Kim Y. et al. Mobile app-based health promotion programs: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15 (12) 2838
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Alhassan GN, Öztürk İ, Adedoyi NFF, Bekun FV. Telehealth as a panacea amidst global pandemic (COVID-19) in Africa. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Derg 2021; 23 (Special Issue): 43-47
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Alhassan GN, Bosnak AS, Hamurtekin E. Perceived satisfaction and outcomes from drug information center services provided with a telehealth approach. Niger J Clin Pract 2022; 25 (12) 2053-2061
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Gonzalez S, Mora Hurtado AC, Syder NC, Rodman J, Elbuluk N. Perception of skin cancer risk and sun protective practices in individuals with vitiligo: a prospective international cross-sectional survey. Arch Dermatol Res 2024; 316 (05) 189
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Abittan B, Pachtman S, Herman S, Indelicato J, Herman J. Perception of breast cancer risk in over 11,000 patients during routine mammography exam. J Cancer Educ 2020; 35 (04) 782-787
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Lane S, Fitzsimmons E, Zelefksy A. et al. Assessing electronic health literacy at an urban academic hospital. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14 (02) 365-373
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Kerr J, Rosenberg D, Frank L. The role of the built environment in healthy aging. J Plann Lit 2012; 27 (01) 43-60
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar