Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2385-1654
Defining Documentation Burden (DocBurden) and Excessive DocBurden for All Health Professionals: A Scoping Review
Funding This work was supported by American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA)'s 25 × 5 Task Force and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ 1HS028454-01A1 Essential Nurse Documentation: Studying EHR Burden during COVID-19 [ENDBurden]). Funding not specific to this work: D.R.L. is supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Academic Affiliations, Office of Research and Development, and has access to facilities at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT (CIN-13-407). C.D. receives support from U.S. National Library of Medicine t15 Grant 5T15LM007079.Abstract
Objectives Efforts to reduce documentation burden (DocBurden) for all health professionals (HP) are aligned with national initiatives to improve clinician wellness and patient safety. Yet DocBurden has not been precisely defined, limiting national conversations and rigorous, reproducible, and meaningful measures. Increasing attention to DocBurden motivated this work to establish a standard definition of DocBurden, with the emergence of excessive DocBurden as a term.
Methods We conducted a scoping review of DocBurden definitions and descriptions, searching six databases for scholarly, peer-reviewed, and gray literature sources, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extensions for Scoping Review guidance. For the concept clarification phase of work, we used the American Nursing Informatics Association's Six Domains of Burden Framework.
Results A total of 153 articles were included based on a priori criteria. Most articles described a focus on DocBurden, but only 18% (n = 28) provided a definition. We define excessive DocBurden as the stress and unnecessarily heavy work an HP or health care team experiences when usability of documentation systems and documentation activities (i.e., generation, review, analysis, and synthesis of patient data) are not aligned in support of care delivery. A negative connotation was attached to burden without a neutral state in included sources, which does not align with dictionary definitions of burden.
Conclusion Existing literature does not distinguish between a baseline or required task load to conduct patient care resulting from usability issues (DocBurden), and the unnecessarily heavy tasks and requirements that contribute to excessive DocBurden. Our definition of excessive DocBurden explicitly acknowledges this distinction, to support development of meaningful measures for understanding and intervening on excessive DocBurden locally, nationally, and internationally.
Keywords
electronic health records and systems - documentation burden - excessive documentation burden - clinician documentation - burden - usability - informatics - health informatics - health careAfter Reading this Work
Readers will understand the concept of DocBurden and excessive DocBurden, the origins of the current domains of DocBurden and be able to articulate a singular standardized definition of excessive DocBurden that can be applied to all HPs.
Research Question
What is a standardized definition of excessive DocBurden to guide and align efforts to reduce burden across a variety of domains, settings, and from various stakeholder perspectives?
Protection of Human Subjects
No human subjects were involved in the project.
Authors' Contribution
D.R.L., J.B.W., S.C.R., and K.C. conceptualized the project. D.R.L., J.B.W. designed the search strategies. B.D., C.D., M.G., D.R.L., R.L., or J.B.W. independently evaluated the titles and abstracts for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted by one reviewer (C.D., M.G., R.L., or J.B.W.) and verified by another (D.R.L. or J.B.W.). All authors contributed to the concept clarification phase. The manuscript was drafted by D.R.L. and J.B.W., with detailed feedback from S.C.R., B.D., and K.C. The manuscript and standardized definitions were reviewed in detail by expert coauthors (P.S., K.J., J.A.M., D.E.D., J.J.C., S.C., J.M., A.J.M., S.T.R.). The complete manuscript (drafts and final version) was reviewed in detail by all coauthors.
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online [Supplementary Appendix Materials].
Disclaimer
The contents of this manuscript represent the view of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. Government. A.J.M. reports employment by JP Morgan Chase, that her views are hers alone, and do not represent those of JP Morgan Chase, and this work was performed on her own time.
* Co-primary authors.
Publication History
Received: 29 May 2024
Accepted: 06 August 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
13 August 2024
Article published online:
30 October 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Yuan CM, Little DJ, Marks ES, Watson MA, Raghavan R, Nee R. Nephrology Education Research and Development Consortium—NERDC. The electronic medical record and nephrology fellowship education in the United States: an opinion survey. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15 (07) 949-956
- 2 Kutney-Lee A, Brooks Carthon M, Sloane DM, Bowles KH, McHugh MD, Aiken LH. Electronic health record usability: associations with nurse and patient outcomes in hospitals. Med Care 2021; 59 (07) 625-631
- 3 Khairat S, Xi L, Liu S, Shrestha S, Austin C. Understanding the association between electronic health record satisfaction and the well-being of nurses: survey study. JMIR Nurs 2020; 3 (01) e13996
- 4 McDonald CJ, Callaghan FM, Weissman A, Goodwin RM, Mundkur M, Kuhn T. Use of internist's free time by ambulatory care electronic medical record systems. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174 (11) 1860-1863
- 5 Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L. et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med 2016; 165 (11) 753-760
- 6 Baumann LA, Baker J, Elshaug AG. The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: a systematic review. Health Policy 2018; 122 (08) 827-836
- 7 Singh H, Spitzmueller C, Petersen NJ, Sawhney MK, Sittig DF. Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173 (08) 702-704
- 8 Nijor S, Rallis G, Lad N, Gokcen E. Patient safety issues from information overload in electronic medical records. J Patient Saf 2022; 18 (06) e999-e1003
- 9 Bloom MV, Huntington MK. Faculty, resident, and clinic staff's evaluation of the effects of EHR implementation. Fam Med 2010; 42 (08) 562-566
- 10 Howe JL, Adams KT, Hettinger AZ, Ratwani RM. Electronic health record usability issues and potential contribution to patient harm. JAMA 2018; 319 (12) 1276-1278
- 11 Harmon CS, Adams SA, Davis JE, Gephart SM, Donevant SB. Unintended consequences of the electronic health record and cognitive load in emergency department nurses. Appl Nurs Res 2023; 73: 151724
- 12 Powell L, Sittig DF, Chrouser K, Singh H. Assessment of health information technology-related outpatient diagnostic delays in the US veterans affairs health care system: a qualitative study of aggregated root cause analysis data. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (06) e206752
- 13 Han S, Shanafelt TD, Sinsky CA. et al. Estimating the attributable cost of physician burnout in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170 (11) 784-790
- 14 Muir KJ, Wanchek TN, Lobo JM, Keim-Malpass J. Evaluating the costs of nurse burnout-attributed turnover: a Markov modeling approach. J Patient Saf 2022; 18 (04) 351-357
- 15 Hilliard RW, Haskell J, Gardner RL. Are specific elements of electronic health record use associated with clinician burnout more than others?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (09) 1401-1410
- 16 Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C. et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91 (07) 836-848
- 17 NASEM. Taking action against clinician burnout: a systems approach to professional well-being (National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2019. . Report No.: 978-0-309-49547-9
- 18 Gesner E, Dykes PC, Zhang L, Gazarian P. Documentation burden in nursing and its role in clinician burnout syndrome. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (05) 983-990
- 19 Yan Q, Jiang Z, Harbin Z, Tolbert PH, Davies MG. Exploring the relationship between electronic health records and provider burnout: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 1009-1021
- 20 Melnick ER, West CP, Nath B. et al. The association between perceived electronic health record usability and professional burnout among US nurses. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (08) 1632-1641
- 21 Downing NL, Bates DW, Longhurst CA. Physician burnout in the electronic health record era: are we ignoring the real cause?. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 (01) 50-51
- 22 Sloss EA, Abdul S, Aboagyewah MA. et al. Toward alleviating clinician documentation burden: a scoping review of burden reduction efforts. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (03) 446-455
- 23 Sengstack P, Adrian B, Boyd DL. et al. The six domains of burden: a conceptual framework to address the burden of documentation in the electronic health record. Position Paper of the American Nursing Informatics Association Board of Directors; 2020
- 24 Moy AJ, Schwartz JM, Chen R. et al. Measurement of clinical documentation burden among physicians and nurses using electronic health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 998-1008
- 25 Moy AJ, Withall J, Hobensack M. et al. Eliciting insights from chat logs of the 25 × 5 symposium to reduce documentation burden: novel application of topic modeling. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25: e45645
- 26 Rossetti SC, Rosenbloom S, Levy DR. et al. 25 × 5 symposium drives ongoing efforts to reduce documentation burden on U.S. clinicians: final summary report 2021. Accessed December 5, 2021 at: https://brand.amia.org/m/dbde97860f393e1/oeifinL/25X5-Summary-Report.pdf
- 27 Hobensack M, Levy DR, Cato K. et al. 25 × 5 symposium to reduce documentation burden: report-out and call for action. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (02) 439-446
- 28 Addressing Health Worker Burnout. The U.S. surgeon general's advisory on building a thriving health workforce, released by the U.S Surgeon General, Dr Vivek Murthy; 2022
- 29 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Strategy on reducing regulatory and administrative burden relating to the use of HealthIT and EHRs: Final Report. Washington, DC; 2020 . Public Law 114-225, Section 4001. https://www.healthit.gov/topic/usability-and-provider-burden/strategy-reducing-burden-relating-use-health-it-and-ehrs
- 30 Office of Burden Reduction and Health Informatics. Burden reduction. Accessed January 5, 2024 at: https://www.cms.gov/priorities/key-initiatives/burden-reduction/about-obrhi
- 31 Levy DR, Sloss EA, Chartash D. et al. Reflections on the documentation burden reduction AMIA plenary session through the lens of 25 × 5. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14 (01) 11-15
- 32 National Burden Reduction Collaborative. . Accessed December 10, 2023 at: https://amia.org/news-publications/amia-and-pacesetters-comprehensively-tackle-burden-reduction-healthcare
- 33 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 (07) 467-473
- 34 Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC. et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 18 (10) 2119-2126
- 35 Kramer MK. Concept clarification and critical thinking: integrated processes. J Nurs Educ 1993; 32 (09) 406-414
- 36 To access the Appendix A1–A3, click on the Details tab of the article online.
- 37 Paez A. Gray literature: an important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med 2017; 10 (03) 233-240
- 38 Merriam-Webster.com. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/document#:~:text=documented%3B%20documenting%3B%20documents,documenting%20their%20claims
- 39 Merriam-Webster.com. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/documentation#:~:text=noun,ky%C9%99%2Dm%C9%99n%2Dtā%2Dsh%C9%99n
- 40 Merriam-webster.com. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/burden
- 41 Please see Appendix A4: Glossary for definition of terms.
- 42 Merriam Webster definitions of cognitive and load. Accessed February 26, 2024 at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cognitive and https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/load
- 43 McKenney K, Shanahan H, Dowd B, Elkbuli A. The burden of medical documentation: the need for a simplifying strategy. Int J Surg 2019; 71: 45-46
- 44 El Noaimi M. Evaluation of Medical Scribes' effect on the emergency department's productivity; 2020
- 45 Ludley A, Ting A, Malik D, Sivanadarajah N. Observational analysis of documentation burden and data duplication in trauma patient pathways at a major trauma centre. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12 (02) e002084
- 46 Rasche P, Mertens A, Miron-Shatz T. et al. Seamless recording of glucometer measurements among older experienced diabetic patients - a study of perception and usability. PLoS One 2018; 13 (05) e0197455
- 47 Frintner MP, Kaelber DC, Kirkendall ES, Lourie EM, Somberg CA, Lehmann CU. The effect of electronic health record burden on pediatricians' work-life balance and career satisfaction. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (03) 697-707
- 48 Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD. et al. Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med 2017; 15 (05) 419-426
- 49 Assis-Hassid S, Grosz BJ, Zimlichman E, Rozenblum R, Bates DW. Assessing EHR use during hospital morning rounds: a multi-faceted study. PLoS One 2019; 14 (02) e0212816
- 50 Sittig DF, Wright A, Ash J, Singh H. New unintended adverse consequences of electronic health records. Yearb Med Inform 2016; 25 (01) 7-12
- 51 Ruan E, Rossetti SC, Hsu H. et al. A practical approach to optimize computerized provider order entry systems and reduce clinician burden: pre-post evaluation of vendor-derived “order friction” data. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2024; 2023: 1246-1256
- 52 McCoy AB, Russo EM, Johnson KB. et al. Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29 (06) 1050-1059
- 53 Lindsay MR, Lytle K. Implementing best practices to redesign workflow and optimize nursing documentation in the electronic health record. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (03) 711-719
- 54 Cerasale MT, Mansour A, Molitch-Hou E, Bernstein S, Nguyen T, Kao CK. Implementation of a real-time documentation assistance tool: automated diagnosis (AutoDx). Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (03) 501-510
- 55 Berner ES, Detmer DE, Simborg D. Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12 (01) 3-7
- 56 Johnson KB, Neuss MJ, Detmer DE. Electronic health records and clinician burnout: a story of three eras. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 967-973
- 57 Moy AJ, Schwartz JM, Withall J. et al. Clinician and health care leaders' experiences with-and perceptions of COVID-19 documentation reduction policies and practices. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (05) 1061-1073
- 58 Murphy DR, Satterly T, Giardina TD, Sittig DF, Singh H. Practicing clinicians' recommendations to reduce burden from the electronic health record inbox: a mixed-methods study. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (09) 1825-1832
- 59 Collins S, Couture B, Kang MJ. et al. Quantifying and visualizing nursing flowsheet documentation burden in acute and critical care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018; 2018: 348-357
- 60 Payne TH, Corley S, Cullen TA. et al. Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 task force on the status and future direction of EHRs. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (05) 1102-1110
- 61 Exploring the relationship between payment models and documentation burden. Accessed April 8, 2024 at: www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/Exploring-the-Relationship-between-Payment-Models-and-Documentation-Burden_508.pdf
- 62 Kang MJ, Rossetti SC, Knaplund C. et al. Nursing documentation variation across different medical facilities within an integrated healthcare system. Comput Inform Nurs 2021; 39 (12) 845-850
- 63 Gesner E, Gazarian P, Dykes P. The burden and burnout in documenting patient care: an integrative literature review. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019; 264: 1194-1198
- 64 Tajirian T, Stergiopoulos V, Strudwick G. et al. The influence of electronic health record use on physician burnout: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (07) e19274
- 65 Quiroz JC, Laranjo L, Kocaballi AB, Berkovsky S, Rezazadegan D, Coiera E. Challenges of developing a digital scribe to reduce clinical documentation burden. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2: 114
- 66 Manaker S, Leahy MD. Bold proposed rule for the 2019 Medicare physician fee schedule: can physicians afford to abandon documentation burdens?. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 (08) 570-572
- 67 Gardner RL, Cooper E, Haskell J. et al. Physician stress and burnout: the impact of health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (02) 106-114
- 68 West CP, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C. et al. Resilience and burnout among physicians and the general US working population. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (07) e209385
- 69 Rao SK, Kimball AB, Lehrhoff SR. et al. The impact of administrative burden on academic physicians: results of a hospital-wide physician survey. Acad Med 2017; 92 (02) 237-243
- 70 ONC. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Non-federal acute care hospital electronic health record adoption. Health IT Quick-Stat #47. https://www.healthit.gov/data/quickstats/non-federal-acute-care-hospital-electronic-health-record-adoption
- 71 Simborg DW, Detmer DE, Berner ES. The wave has finally broken: now what?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (e1): e21-e25
- 72 Moy AJ, Schwartz JM, Elias J. et al. Time-motion examination of electronic health record utilization and clinician workflows indicate frequent task switching and documentation burden. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2021; 2020: 886-895
- 73 Moy AJ, Aaron L, Cato KD. et al. Characterizing multitasking and workflow fragmentation in electronic health records among emergency department clinicians: using time-motion data to understand documentation burden. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (05) 1002-1013
- 74 Gesner EJ. Nurses' documentation burden and its role in clinician burnout syndrome; 2021
- 75 Bardram JE, Bossen C. Mobility work: the spatial dimension of collaboration at a hospital. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2005 ;14:131–160
- 76 AMIA 25 × 5 Toolkit. Accessed February 27, 2024 at: https://amia.org/about-amia/amia-25×5/25×5-documentation-burden-reduction-toolkit
- 77 Documentation Burden. Effective Health Care Program, Agency for healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. 2023. Accessed February 2023 at: https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/get-involved/nominated-topics/documentation-burden
- 78 AHRQ Technical Brief. Documentation Burden. Effective Health Care Program. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD; . Accessed May 2024 at: https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/documentation-burden-prepub-tech-brief.pdf
- 79 Cabilan CJ, Eley RM. Review article: potential of medical scribes to allay the burden of documentation and enhance efficiency in Australian emergency departments. Emerg Med Australas 2015; 27 (06) 507-511
- 80 DiSanto R, Venkat Prasad MD. Scribe utilization in the primary care environment. J Med Pract Manage 2017; 33 (01) 66