Subscribe to RSS
Governance of Electronic Health Record Modification at U.S. Academic Medical CentersFunding This work was the product of an unfunded trainee project.
Objectives A key aspect of electronic health record (EHR) governance involves the approach to EHR modification. We report a descriptive study to characterize EHR governance at academic medical centers (AMCs) across the United States.
Methods We conducted interviews with the Chief Medical Information Officers of 18 AMCs about the process of EHR modification for standard requests. Recordings of the interviews were analyzed to identify categories within prespecified domains. Responses were then assigned to categories for each domain.
Results At our AMCs, EHR requests were governed variably, with a similar number of sites using quantitative scoring systems (7, 38.9%), qualitative systems (5, 27.8%), or no scoring system (6, 33.3%). Two (11%) organizations formally review all requests for their impact on health equity. Although 14 (78%) organizations have trained physician builders/architects, their primary role was not for EHR build. Most commonly reported governance challenges included request volume (11, 61%), integrating diverse clinician input (3, 17%), and stakeholder buy-in (3, 17%). The slowest step in the process was clarifying end user requests (14, 78%). Few leaders had identified metrics for the success of EHR governance.
Conclusion Governance approaches for managing EHR modification at AMCs are highly variable, which suggests ongoing efforts to balance EHR standardization and maintenance burden, while dealing with a high volume of requests. Developing metrics to capture the performance of governance and quantify problems may be a key step in identifying best practices.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed by UCSF Institutional Review Board.
Received: 06 April 2023
Accepted: 07 August 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
08 August 2023
Article published online:
25 October 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
- 1 Weill P, Ross JIT. Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. 1st ed.. Harvard Business Review Press; 2004
- 2 Ash JS, Singh H, Wright A, Chase D, Sittig DF. Essential activities for electronic health record safety: a qualitative study. Health Informatics J 2020; 26 (04) 3140-3151
- 3 Shabot MM, Polaschek JX, Duncan RG, Langberg ML, Jones DT. A novel governance system for enterprise information services. Proc AMIA Symp 1999; 619-623
- 4 Fragidis LL, Chatzoglou PD. Implementation of a nationwide electronic health record (EHR). Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2018; 31 (02) 116-130
- 5 Aguirre RR, Suarez O, Fuentes M, Sanchez-Gonzalez MA. Electronic health record implementation: a review of resources and tools. Cureus 2019; 11 (09) e5649
- 6 Auerbach AD, Neinstein A, Khanna R. Balancing innovation and safety when integrating digital tools into health care. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168 (10) 733-734
- 7 Auerbach A, Burke K, Khanna R. Effective and collegial governance of digital tools in health care. ACI Open 2021; 05 (01) e13-e16
- 8 McKeeby JWS, , S Coffey P, Houston SM. et al. The evolution of information technology governance at the NIH clinical center. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2021; 18 (03) 1c
- 9 Kannan V, Basit MA, Bajaj P. et al. User stories as lightweight requirements for agile clinical decision support development. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (11) 1344-1354
- 10 Chaparro JD, Beus JM, Dziorny AC. et al. Clinical decision support stewardship: best practices and techniques to monitor and improve interruptive alerts. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (03) 560-568
- 11 Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM) | HIMSS. Accessed February 16, 2023 at: https://www.himss.org/what-we-do-solutions/digital-health-transformation/maturity-models/electronic-medical-record-adoption-model-emram
- 12 Chawla N, Lang R, Michael D, McPeek Hinz E. Understanding clinical governance. Presented at: Epic UGM; 2019. Verona, WI:
- 13 Skelton J, Wilson W. Implementing successful prioritization and governance processes for change requests. Presented at: Epic XGM; 2018. Verona, WI:
- 14 Feen J, Bechard L. Request intake governance that defies the eyes. Presented at: Epic UGM; 2017. Verona, WI:
- 15 Jung J, Nelsen D. Planning the governance and communication intake process. Presented at: Epic UGM; 2018. Verona, WI:
- 16 Acholonu RG, Raphael JL. The influence of the electronic health record on achieving equity and eliminating health disparities for children. Pediatr Ann 2022; 51 (03) e112-e117
- 17 James TG, Sullivan MK, Butler JD, McKee MM. Promoting health equity for deaf patients through the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 29 (01) 213-216
- 18 AHA Annual Survey DatabaseTM | AHA Data. Accessed January 29, 2023 at: https://www.ahadata.com/aha-annual-survey-database
- 19 Bansler JP. Challenges in user-driven optimization of EHR: a case study of a large Epic implementation in Denmark. Int J Med Inform 2021; 148: 104394
- 20 Najafi N, Robinson A, Pletcher MJ, Patel S. Effectiveness of an analytics-based intervention for reducing sleep interruption in hospitalized patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182 (02) 172-177
- 21 Kharbanda EO, Asche SE, Sinaiko AR. et al. Clinical decision support for recognition and management of hypertension: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2018; 141 (02) e20172954
- 22 Tran AV, Rushakoff RJ, Prasad P, Murray SG, Monash B, Macmaster H. Decreasing hypoglycemia following insulin administration for inpatient hyperkalemia. J Hosp Med 2020; 15 (02) 368-370
- 23 Tokazewski JT, Peifer M, Howell III JT. Leveraging and improving refill protocols at your health system. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (05) 1063-1069
- 24 Cockburn A. Agile software development. Addison-Wesley; 2002