Evaluation of an Online Decision Aid for Selection of Contraceptive Methods

Abstract

Objectives Knowledge gaps in contraceptives led to their low adoption rates and misuse in young women. The existing online contraception decision aids missed certain decision factors deemed important to college-aged women and did not consistently provide clear and accurate recommendations. To address the needs of young women and the limitations in current tools, we developed a prototype contraception decision aid, My Contraceptive Choice (MCC). This article reports an evaluation study of the MCC tool.

Methods We conducted a mixed methods study: (1) to assess MCC's usefulness and usability through an online survey and a follow-up focus group, and (2) to provide a quantitative examination on the recommendations generated by MCC to match with individual user's needs and preferences through simulated test cases.

Results The survey of 150 college-aged women showed very positive responses (reflecting personal preferences, 75%; helping people learn more about birth control methods, 88%; easy to navigate, 91%). The follow-up focus group of 10 survey participants reconfirmed most findings from the survey and provided detailed feedback on certain system functions, such as the inclusion of an important decision factor of weight gain and the efficient hybrid design to integrate the customized recommendations with the side-by-side comparison of all contraceptive methods. Simulated test cases showed that the MCC tool achieved an accuracy of 72% in addressing user preferences and an accuracy of 72% in satisfying user needs, which were significantly better than the existing Planned Parenthood tool.

Conclusion The initial evaluations suggest that the MCC tool has achieved good levels of usefulness, usability, and appropriate recommendations to address user needs and preferences. Future research is required to assess the performance of the MCC tool in naturalistic settings and to examine the generalizability of the findings to other user populations.

Keywords

contraception - decision making - weight gain - women - focus group - survey

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was approved by the ASU IRB.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. August 2022

Angenommen: 21. Dezember 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
28. Dezember 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Februar 2023

• References

• 1 Birth control methods | womenshealth.gov. Accessed February 24, 2021 at: https://www.womenshealth.gov/a-z-topics/birth-control-methods
• 2 Caserta D, Ralli E, Matteucci E, Bordi G, Mallozzi M, Moscarini M. Combined oral contraceptives: health benefits beyond contraception. Panminerva Med 2014; 56 (03) 233-244
• 3 Melo J, Peters M, Teal S, Guiahi M. Adolescent and young women's contraceptive decision-making processes: choosing “The Best Method for Her”. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015; 28 (04) 224-228
• 4 Powell A. Choosing the right oral contraceptive pill for teens. Pediatr Clin North Am 2017; 64 (02) 343-358
• 5 Planned Parenthood. Birth control methods & options | Types of birth control. Accessed February 27, 2021 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control
• 6 Roos-Hesselink JW, Cornette J, Sliwa K, Pieper PG, Veldtman GR, Johnson MR. Contraception and cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 2015; 36 (27) 1728-1734 , 1734a–1734b
• 7 Cohen R, Sheeder J, Kane M, Teal SB. Factors associated with contraceptive method choice and initiation in adolescents and young women. J Adolesc Health 2017; 61 (04) 454-460
• 8 Sooter LJ, Hasley S, Lario R, Rubin KS, Hasić F. Modeling a clinical pathway for contraception. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (05) 935-943
• 9 Bonner C, Patel P, Fajardo MA, Zhuang R, Trevena L. Online decision aids for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: systematic search, evaluation of quality and suitability for low health literacy patients. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (03) e025173
• 10 A to Z Inventory -Patient decision aids - Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Accessed August 11, 2021 at: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/azlist.html
• 11 Cameron M, Tan J, McLellan C. et al. Development of patient decision aids for plaque psoriasis and acne. Dermatol Online J 2018; 24 (07) 13030/qt6z27q8bq
• 12 Weiner AB, Tsai KP, Keeter MK. et al. The influence of decision aids on prostate cancer screening preferences: a randomized survey study. J Urol 2018; 200 (05) 1048-1055
• 13 Planned Parenthood. Decision Making PPFA. Accessed February 24, 2021 at: https://tools.plannedparenthood.org/bc/birth_control_quiz
• 14 Bedsider. Compare birth control methods. Accessed February 24, 2021 at: https://www.bedsider.org/methods/matrix
• 15 Assessing decision aids for contraceptive selection – Molly Redman. E-posters. Accessed March 3, 2021 at: https://eposters.aaas.org
• 16 10 Usability heuristics for user interface design. Accessed February 25, 2021 at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
• 17 Redman M, Brian J, Wang D. Development of an online contraceptive decision aid for college women. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2022; 2021: 1049-1058
• 18 Redman M, Brian J, Wang D. My Contraceptive Choice: a decision support tool for college women. Stud Health Technol Inform 2022; 290: 1096-1097
• 19 Yen PY, Bakken S. Review of health information technology usability study methodologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (03) 413-422
• 20 Contraception | Reproductive health. CDC. Accessed February 24, 2021 at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/contraception/index.htm
• 21 Brunner Huber LR, Ersek JL. Contraceptive use and non-use among sexually active university students. Ann Epidemiol 2008; 18 (09) 740
• 22 CDC - Summary - US SPR - Reproductive health. Published May 20, 2021. Accessed February 15, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/contraception/mmwr/spr/summary.html
• 23 Atkin K, Beal MW, Long-Middleton E, Roncari D. Long-acting reversible contraceptives for teenagers: primary care recommendations. Nurse Pract 2015; 40 (03) 38-46 , quiz 46–47
• 24 Hirth JM, Dinehart EE, Lin YL, Kuo YF, Patel PR. Reasons why young women in the United States choose their contraceptive method. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2021; 30 (01) 64-72
• 25 Planned Parenthood. Condoms. Accessed February 15, 2022 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/condom
• 26 Planned Parenthood. IUD birth control | Info About Mirena & Paragard IUDs. Accessed August 12, 2021 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/iud
• 27 Planned Parenthood. NuvaRing | Birth control vaginal ring | Estrogen ring. Accessed August 12, 2021 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/birth-control-vaginal-ring-nuvaring
• 28 Planned Parenthood. Birth control pills | The pill | Contraceptive pills. Accessed August 12, 2021 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/birth-control-pill
• 29 Planned Parenthood. Birth control implants | Nexplanon information. Accessed August 12, 2021 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/birth-control-implant-nexplanon
• 30 Planned Parenthood. Birth control patch | Ortho Evra | Transdermal patch. Accessed August 12, 2021 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/birth-control-patch
• 31 Planned Parenthood. Depo-Provera | Birth control shot | Birth control injection. Accessed August 12, 2021 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/birth-control-shot
• 32 Planned Parenthood. Fertility awareness methods | Natural birth control. Accessed August 12, 2021 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/fertility-awareness
• 33 Planned Parenthood. Does birth control make you gain weight? Accessed June 26, 2021 at: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/teens/ask-experts/does-birth-control-make-you-gain-weight
• 34 Birth control and weight gain: why it happens and how to prevent it. Accessed June 26, 2021 at: https://www.healthline.com/health/how-to-lose-weight-on-birth-control#what-the-research-says
• 35 Kaufman DR, Patel VL, Hilliman C. et al. Usability in the real world: assessing medical information technologies in patients' homes. J Biomed Inform 2003; 36 (1–2): 45-60