Prevalence and Factors Associated with Patient-Requested Corrections to the Medical Record through Use of a Patient Portal: Findings from a National Survey

Abstract

Background Providing patients with medical records access is one strategy that health systems can utilize to reduce medical errors. However, how often patients request corrections to their records on a national scale is unknown.

Objectives We aimed to develop population-level estimates of patients who request corrections to their medical records using national-level data. We also identified patient-level correlates of requesting corrections.

Methods We used the 2017 and 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey and examined all patient portal adopters. We applied jackknife replicate weights to develop population-representative estimates of the prevalence of requesting medical record corrections. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify correlates of requesting corrections while controlling for demographic factors, health care utilization patterns, health status, technology/internet use patterns, and year.

Results Across 1,657 respondents, 125 (weighted estimate: 6.5%) reported requesting corrections to their medical records. In unadjusted models, greater odds of requesting corrections were observed among patients who reported their race/ethnicity as non-Hispanic black (odds ratio [OR]: 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10–4.43), had frequent portal visits (OR: 3.92, 95% CI: 1.51–10.23), and had entered data into the portal (OR: 7.51, 95% CI: 4.08–13.81). In adjusted models, we found greater odds of requesting corrections among those who reported frequent portal visits (OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.24–9.33) and those who reported entering data into the portal (OR: 6.43, 95% CI: 3.20–12.94). No other significant differences were observed.

Conclusion Prior to the Information Blocking Final Rule in April 2021, approximately 6.5% of patients requested corrections of errors in their medical records at the national level. Those who reported higher engagement with their health, as proxied by portal visit frequency and entering data into the portal, were more likely to request corrections.

Keywords

documentation - patient portal - patient engagement

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The University of Florida Institutional Review Board reviewed the protocol and approved the study as exempt.

Author Contributions

This work represents the original research of the authors. This work has not been previously published. O.T.N. and K.T. conceptualized the study. O.T.N. drafted the manuscript. O.T.N. analyzed the data. All authors participated in the interpretation of data. Y-.R.H., A.A.T., K.H., and K.T. provided critical revisions to the manuscript. All authors approved the submission.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. August 2021

Angenommen: 31. Dezember 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Februar 2022

• References

• 1 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Promoting interoperability programs. Accessed June 9, 2020 at: https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms
• 2 Health and Human Services Department. 21st Century Cures Act: interoperability, information blocking, and the ONC health IT certification program. Fed Regist 2020; 85: 25642-25961
• 3 Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Health communication and health information technology. Accessed August 15, 2021 at: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/health-communication-and-health-information-technology
• 4 OpenNotes. Our history: Fifty years in the making. Accessed August 20, 2021 at: https://www.opennotes.org/history/
• 5 Dullabh PM, Sondheimer NK, Katsh E, Evans MA. How patients can improve the accuracy of their medical records. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2014; 2 (03) 1080
• 6 Zarcadoolas C, Vaughon WL, Czaja SJ, Levy J, Rockoff ML. Consumers' perceptions of patient-accessible electronic medical records. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15 (08) e168
• 7 Dhanireddy S, Walker J, Reisch L, Oster N, Delbanco T, Elmore JG. The urban underserved: attitudes towards gaining full access to electronic medical records. Health Expect 2014; 17 (05) 724-732
• 8 Bell SK, Mejilla R, Anselmo M. et al. When doctors share visit notes with patients: a study of patient and doctor perceptions of documentation errors, safety opportunities and the patient-doctor relationship. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26 (04) 262-270
• 9 Bell SK, Gerard M, Fossa A. et al. A patient feedback reporting tool for OpenNotes: implications for patient-clinician safety and quality partnerships. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26 (04) 312-322
• 10 Gerard M, Fossa A, Folcarelli PH, Walker J, Bell SK. What patients value about reading visit notes: a qualitative inquiry of patient experiences with their health information. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (07) e237
• 11 Hanauer DA, Preib R, Zheng K, Choi SW. Patient-initiated electronic health record amendment requests. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (06) 992-1000
• 12 Bell SK, Delbanco T, Elmore JG. et al. Frequency and types of patient-reported errors in electronic health record ambulatory care notes. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (06) e205867
• 13 Mishra VK, Hoyt RE, Wolver SE, Yoshihashi A, Banas C. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of patients' perceptions of the patient portal experience with OpenNotes. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 10-18
• 14 Prater L, Sanchez A, Modan G. et al. Electronic health record documentation patterns of recorded primary care visits focused on complex communication: a qualitative study. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (02) 247-253
• 15 Chrischilles EA, Hourcade JP, Doucette W. et al. Personal health records: a randomized trial of effects on elder medication safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (04) 679-686
• 16 Kaboli PJ, McClimon BJ, Hoth AB, Barnett MJ. Assessing the accuracy of computerized medication histories. Am J Manag Care 2004; 10 (11, Pt 2): 872-877
• 17 Chan KS, Fowles JB, Weiner JP. Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2010; 67 (05) 503-527
• 18 Nahm E-S, Son H, Yoon JM. Older adults' use of patient portals: experiences, challenges, and suggestions shared through discussion board forums. Geriatr Nurs 2020; 41 (04) 387-393
• 19 Dolan JE, Lonsdale H, Ahumada LM. et al. Quality initiative using theory of change and visual analytics to improve controlled substance documentation discrepancies in the operating room. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (03) 543-551
• 20 Eze-Nliam C, Cain K, Bond K. et al. Discrepancies between the medical record and the reports of patients with acute coronary syndrome regarding important aspects of the medical history. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 78
• 21 Corser W, Sikorskii A, Olomu A, Stommel M, Proden C, Holmes-Rovner M. “Concordance between comorbidity data from patient self-report interviews and medical record documentation”. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 85
• 22 Weiner SJ, Wang S, Kelly B, Sharma G, Schwartz A. How accurate is the medical record? A comparison of the physician's note with a concealed audio recording in unannounced standardized patient encounters. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (05) 770-775
• 23 National Cancer Institute. Methodology reports. Accessed August 20, 2021 at: https://hints.cancer.gov/data/methodology-reports.aspx
• 24 Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, Sands DZ. Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (01) 91-95
• 25 Weppner WG, Ralston JD, Koepsell TD. et al. Use of a shared medical record with secure messaging by older patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010; 33 (11) 2314-2319
• 26 Krist AH, Woolf SH, Rothemich SF. et al. Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10 (04) 312-319
• 27 Turner K, Hong Y-R, Yadav S, Huo J, Mainous AG. Patient portal utilization: before and after stage 2 electronic health record meaningful use. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (10) 960-967
• 28 Zhong X, Park J, Liang M. et al. Characteristics of patients using different patient portal functions and the impact on primary care service utilization and appointment adherence: retrospective observational study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (02) e14410
• 29 Hong YA, Jiang S, Liu PL. Use of patient portals of electronic health records remains low from 2014 to 2018: results from a national survey and policy implications. Am J Health Promot 2020; 34 (06) 677-680
• 30 Tenforde M, Nowacki A, Jain A, Hickner J. The association between personal health record use and diabetes quality measures. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27 (04) 420-424
• 31 Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, Hasnain-Wynia R, Thompson JA, Baker DW. Disparities in enrollment and use of an electronic patient portal. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26 (10) 1112-1116
• 32 Perzynski AT, Roach MJ, Shick S. et al. Patient portals and broadband internet inequality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (05) 927-932
• 33 Osborn CY, Mayberry LS, Wallston KA, Johnson KB, Elasy TA. Understanding patient portal use: implications for medication management. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15 (07) e133
• 34 Lyles CR, Harris LT, Jordan L. et al. Patient race/ethnicity and shared medical record use among diabetes patients. Med Care 2012; 50 (05) 434-440
• 35 Roblin DW, Houston II TK, Allison JJ, Joski PJ, Becker ER. Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (05) 683-689
• 36 Miller H, Vandenbosch B, Ivanov D, Black P. Determinants of personal health record use: a large population study at Cleveland Clinic. J Healthc Inf Manag 2007; 21 (03) 44-48
• 37 Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH. et al. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171 (06) 568-574
• 38 Turner K, Nguyen O, Hong Y-R, Tabriz AA, Patel K, Jim HSL. Use of electronic health record patient portal accounts among patients with smartphone-only internet access. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (07) e2118229
• 39 Freise L, Neves AL, Flott K. et al. Assessment of patients' ability to review electronic health record information to identify potential errors: cross-sectional web-based survey. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5 (02) e19074
• 40 Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D. et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (06) 505-513
• 41 Earnest MA, Ross SE, Wittevrongel L, Moore LA, Lin C-T. Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (05) 410-417
• 42 Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54 (498) 38-43
• 43 Ross SE, Moore LA, Earnest MA, Wittevrongel L, Lin C-T. Providing a web-based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: randomized trial. J Med Internet Res 2004; 6 (02) e12
• 44 Bhavnani V, Fisher B, Winfield M, Seed P. How patients use access to their electronic GP record–a quantitative study. Fam Pract 2011; 28 (02) 188-194
• 45 Mossaed S, Leonard K, Eysenbach G. Patient preferences and perspectives on accessing their medical records. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2015; 46 (02) 205-214
• 46 Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20 (06) 531-535
• 47 van Kuppenveld SI, van Os-Medendorp H, Tiemessen NA, van Delden JJ. Real-time access to electronic health record via a patient portal: is it harmful? A retrospective observational study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (02) e13622
• 48 Jones RB, McGhee SM, McGhee D. Patient on-line access to medical records in general practice. Health Bull (Edinb) 1992; 50 (02) 143-150
• 49 Bell SK, Roche SD, Mueller A. et al. Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers. BMJ Qual Saf 2018; 27 (11) 928-936
• 50 Porter AS, O'Callaghan J, Englund KA, Lorenz RR, Kodish E. Problems with the problem list: challenges of transparency in an era of patient curation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (06) 981-984