Test Turnaround Times and Mortality Rates 12 and 24 Months after the Introduction of a Computerised Provider Order Entry System

Summary

Objectives: Few studies have measured the long-term effects of computerised provider order entry systems on pathology test turnaround time. Further, a recent study has raised the possibility that such systems, which require significant work practice change, may be associated with an increase in mortality rates. Our study answered two questions in relation to system introduction in a major Australian teaching hospital: i) are improvements in turnaround times achieved in the first 12 months after system introduction sustained 24 months post-implementation; and ii) do mortality rates change following the introduction of an order entry system?

Methods: Turnaround time and mortality rates 5 months before and 12 and 24 months after implementation of a computerised order entry system were measured. Turnaround time was defined as the time from receipt of a specimen and order in a laboratory to availability of a result.

Results: Improvements in turnaround time achieved in the first 12 months were sustained with a further significant 12.6% reduction at 24 months post-implementation, with no change in average number of tests per patient. The mortality rate significantly increased in the year following system introduction but returned to the pre-system rate in the second year of system use. Review of the excess deaths demonstrated these were most likely attributable to a coincidental influenza outbreak and not to system introduction.

Conclusions: The computerised provider order entry system produced sustained and continuing improvements in laboratory efficiency over a two-year period. Associations between increased mortality rates and system introduction should be investigated carefully to ascertain any likely association.

Keywords

Computerised provider order entry - turnaround time - mortality - pathology

• References

• 1 Manor P. Turnaround times in the laboratory: A review of the literature. Clinical Laboratory Science 1999; 12 (02) 85-89.
• 2 Lee-Lewandrowski E. et al. Implementation of a point-of-care satellite laboratory in the emergency department of an academic medical center. Impact on test turnaround time and patient emergency department length of stay. Archives of Pathology Laboratory Medicine 2003; 127 (04) 456-460.
• 3 Richardson D. The access-block effect: relationship between delay to reaching an inpatient bed and inpatient length of stay. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 492-495.
• 4 Westbrook J. et al. Computerised pathology test order entry reduced laboratory turnaround times and influences tests ordered by hospital clinicians: a controlled before and after study. J Clin Path 2006; 59: 533-536.
• 5 Guss DA, Chan TC, Killeen JP. The Impact of a Pneumatic Tube and Computerized Physician Order Management on Laboratory Turnaround Time. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 51 (02) 181-185.
• 6 Georgiou A. et al. Multiple perspectives on the impact of electronic ordering on hospital organisational and communication processes. Hlth Inf Mngt 2005
• 7 Georgiou A. et al. When requests become orders – a formative investigation into the impact of computerised physician order entry systems on a pathology service. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76: 583-591.
• 8 Georgiou A. et al. The impact of computerised physician order entry systems on pathology services: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (07) 514-529.
• 9 Ash J, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information systems related errors. J Am Med Inform Ass 2004; 11 (02) 104-112.
• 10 Han Y. et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1506-1512.
• 11 Ammenwerth E. et al. Impact of CPOE on mortality rates – contradictory findings, important messages. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 586-594.
• 12 Westbrook J. et al. Multi-method evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and socio-technical theory. J Am Med Inform Ass 2007; 14 (06) 746-755.
• 13 Hawkins RC. Laboratory Turnaround Time. Clin Biochem Rev 2007; 28: 179-194.
• 14 Ahmad A. et al. Key attributes of a successful physician order entry system implementation in a multi-hospital environment. J Am Med Inform Ass 2002; 9 (01) 16-24.
• 15 Thompson W. et al. Computerized physician order entry of diagnostic tests in an intensive care unit is associated with improved timeliness of service. Crit Care Med 2004; 32 (06) 1306-1309.
• 16 Ostbye T. et al. Introducing a module for laboratory test order entry and reporting of results at a hospital ward: An evaluation study using a multi-method approach. J Med Sys 1997; 21 (02) 107-117.
• 17 Georgiou A. et al. A Context-Mechanism-Outcome approach to the evaluation of computerised physician order entry systems. In: Grain H, Wise M, Chu S. (eds). Conference proceedings of the 13th National Health Informatics Conference. Health Informatics Society of Australia: Melbourne: 2005
• 18 Georgiou A. et al. Pathology’s front line – a comparison of the experiences of electronic ordering in the Clinical Chemistry and Haematology departments. In: Information Technology in Health Care; Socio-technical approaches. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2007. pp 121-132.
• 19 Georgiou A. et al. The use of performance metrics to monitor the impact of CPOE on pathology laboratory services. In: XXI Medical Informatics Europe (MIE). Sweden: IOS Press; 2008. pp 291-296.
• 20 Viccellio P. Turnaround time and transaction costs. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 51 (02) 186-187.
• 21 Collin S. et al. Implementation of computerised physician order entry (CPOE) and picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in the NHS: quantitative before and after study. BMJ 2008; 337: a939 doi:10.1136/bmj.a939.