Download PDF
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2009; 59(7): 264-272
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1067437
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Exekutive Dysfunktionen bei Patientinnen mit Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung unter Berücksichtigung von Impulsivität und Depressivität

Executive Dysfunctions in Female Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder with Regard to Impulsiveness and DepressionKathleen  Anna  Völker1 , 3 , Carsten  Spitzer2 , Anke  Limberg1 , 3 , Hans-Jörgen  Grabe1 , Harald  Jürgen  Freyberger1 , Sven  Barnow3
  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald
  • 2Institut und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • 3Psychologisches Institut, Arbeitseinheit Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 20. Nov. 2007

akzeptiert 15. Mai 2008

Publication Date:
03 July 2008 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung Ausgeprägte Impulsivität und affektive Dysregulation bei Personen mit Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung (BPS) weisen auf exekutive Dysfunktionen hin. Bisherige Befunde hierzu sind jedoch inkonsistent, unter anderem weil häufig nicht für komorbide Merkmale wie Impulsivität und Depressivität bzw. Medikation kontrolliert wurde. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, exekutive Leistungen bei Patientinnen mit BPS unter Berücksichtigung von Impulsivität und im Vergleich zu einer depressiven Kontrollgruppe zu untersuchen. Methode Es wurden 24 unmedizierte BPS-Patientinnen und 24 hinsichtlich Alter, Geschlecht und einem Intelligenzkorrelat parallelisierte gesunde Kontrollprobandinnen sowie 22 Patientinnen mit einer depressiven Lebenszeitdiagnose untersucht. Alle Versuchsteilnehmer absolvierten eine umfangreiche neuropsychologische Testbatterie zur Erfassung der exekutiven Funktionen. Ergebnisse Es zeigten sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen der BPS-Gruppe und der gesunden bzw. depressiven Kontrollgruppe bezüglich exekutiver Leistungsparameter. Allerdings wiesen Personen mit BPS erhebliche Defizite in der Fähigkeit zum Belohnungsaufschub auf. Schlussfolgerung Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass BPS-Patientinnen vorwiegend Defizite in Funktionsbereichen, die eher motivational bedingt sind, aufweisen, wohingegen andere exekutive Funktionen nicht wesentlich eingeschränkt sind.

Abstract

Introduction Because of the presence of pronounced impulsiveness and affective dysregulation in subjects with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) executive dysfunctions have been suspected. Previous studies in this area revealed inconsistent results. However, most of these studies did not control for comorbidity (e. g. impulsiveness, depression) and current medication of participants. The aim of this study was, therefore, to investigate executive (dys)functions in patients with BPD and healthy controls controlling for impulsivity. Furthermore, a second control group with depression was included to test the specificity of the results. Method 24 unmedicated, female BPD patients as well as 24 healthy controls were matched for age, sex, and intelligence. Additionally, 22 female subjects with a life-time diagnosis of depression were included. All subjects completed a neuropsychological test battery assessing executive functions. Results No significant differences in executive functioning were found between the three groups. BPD patients showed, however, a decreased ability to delay a gratification compared with controls. Conclusion These results implicate that BPD patients have deficits in motivational areas while other executive functions are not or only marginally involved.

Key words

Borderline Personality Disorder - executive functions - impulsiveness - depression

Literatur

  • 1 Barnow S. Persönlichkeitsstörungen: Ursachen und Behandlungen. Bern, Göttingen, Toronto; Huber 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Dougherty D M, Bjork J M, Huckabee H C. et al . Laboratory measures of aggression and impulsivity in women with borderline personality disorder.  Psychiatry Res. 1999;  85 315-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Soloff P H, Meltzer C C, Greer P J. et al . A fenfluramine-activated FDG-PET study of borderline personality disorder.  Biol Psychiatry. 2000;  47 540-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sanislow C A, Grilo C M, McGlashan T H. Factor Analysis of the DSM-III-R Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria in Psychiatric Inpatients. 2000: 1629-1633
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Links P, Heslegrave R J, van Reekum R. Impulsivity: Core aspect of borderline personality disorder.  Journal of Personality Disorder. 1999;  13 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mann J, Waternaux C, Haas G L, Malone K M. Toward a clinical model of suicidal behavior in psychiatric patients.  American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;  156 181-9
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Soloff P H, Lis J A, Kelly T. et al . Risk factors for suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder.  Am J Psychiatry. 1994;  151 1316-1323
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Barnow S, Herpertz S, Spitzer C. et al . Temperament and character in patients with borderline personality disorder taking gender and comorbidity into account.  Psychopathology. 2007;  40 369-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Barnow S, Ruge J, Spitzer C, Freyberger H J. Temperament and character in persons with borderline personality disorder.  Nervenarzt. 2005;  76 839-848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Clarkin J, Hull J W, Hurt S W. Factor structure of borderline personality disorder criteria.  Journal of Personality Disorder. 1993;  7 137-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Barnow S, Spitzer C, Grabe H J. et al . Individual characteristics, familial experience, and psychopathology in children of mothers with borderline personality disorder.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;  45 965-972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cummings J. Clinical Neuropsychiatry. New York; Grune & Stratton 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Kunert H J, Druecke H W, Sass H, Herpertz S C. Frontal lobe dysfunctions in borderline personality disorder? Neuropsychological findings.  J Personal Disord. 2003;  17 497-509
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 van Reekum R, Conway C A, Gansler D. et al . Neurobehavioral study of borderline personality disorder.  J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1993;  18 121-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 van Reekum R, Links P S, Finlayson M A. et al . Repeat neurobehavioral study of borderline personality disorder.  J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1996;  21 13-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cornelius J, George A WA, Schulz C. et al . An evaluation of the significance of selected neuropsychiatric abnormalities in the etiology of borderline personality disorder.  Journal of Personality Disorder. 1989;  3 19-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sprock J, Rader T J, Kendall J P, Yoder C Y. Neuropsychological functioning in patients with borderline personality disorder.  J Clin Psychol. 2000;  56 1587-1600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 O'Leary K M, Brouwers P, Gardner D L, Cowdry R W. Neuropsychological testing of patients with borderline personality disorder.  Am J Psychiatry. 1991;  148 106-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Burgess J W. Relationship of depression and cognitive impairment to self-injury in borderline personality disorder, major depression, and schizophrenia.  Psychiatry Research. 1991;  38 77-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Burgess J W. Cognitive information processing in borderline personality disorder: A neuropsychiatric hypothesis.  Jefferson Journal of Psychiatry. 1990;  8 34-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ullsperger M, Cramon D Y von. Funktionen frontaler Strukuren. In: Karnath H, Thier P (Hrsg) Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg; Springer 2006: 479-488
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Bilder R M, Goldman R S, Robinson D. et al .Neuropsychology of First-Episode Schizophrenia: Initial Characterization and Clinical Correlates. 2000: 549-559
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Zakzanis K MA, Leach L PD, Kaplan E PD. On the Nature and Pattern of Neurocognitive Function in Major Depressive Disorder.  Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology & Behavioral Neurology. 1998;  11 111-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hervey A S, Epstein J N, Curry J F. Neuropsychology of Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review.  Neuropsychology. 2004;  18 485-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Moriyama Y, Mimura M, Kato M. Executive dysfunction and clinical outcome in chronic alcoholics.  Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2002;  26 1239-1244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dolan M, Park I. The neuropsychology of antisocial personality disorder.  Psychological Medicine. 2002;  32 417-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fertuck E A, Lenzenweger M F, Clarkin J F. et al . Executive neurocognition, memory systems, and borderline personality disorder.  Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;  26 346-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 LeGris J, van Reekum R. The neuropsychological correlates of borderline personality disorder and suicidal behaviour.  Can J Psychiatry. 2006;  51 131-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kurtz J E, Morey L C. Verbal Memory Dysfunction in Depressed Outpatients With and Without Borderline Personality Disorder.  Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 1999;  21 141-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Posner M I, Rothbart M K, Vizueta N. et al .Attentional mechanisms of borderline personality disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002: 16366-16370
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Swirsky-Sacchetti T, Gorton G, Samuel S. et al . Neuropsychological function in borderline personality disorder.  Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1993;  49 385-396
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bazanis E, Rogers R D, Dowson J H. et al . Neurocognitive deficits in decision-making and planning of patients with DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder.  Psychological Medicine. 2002;  32 1395-1405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Driessen M, Herrmann J, Stahl K. et al . Magnetic resonance imaging volumes of the hippocampus and the amygdala in women with borderline personality disorder and early traumatization.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;  57 1115-1122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ruocco A C. The neuropsychology of borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis and review.  Psychiatry Research. 2005;  137 191-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 American Psychiatric Association .Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC; American Psychiatric Association 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Grunhaus L, King D, Greden J F, Flegel P. Depression and panic in patients with borderline personality disorder.  Biological Psychiatry. 1985;  20 688-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Zanarini M C, Frankenburg F R, Hennen J, Silk K R. The Longitudinal Course of Borderline Psychopathology: 6-Year Prospective Follow-Up of the Phenomenology of Borderline Personality Disorder. 2003: 274-283
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Zimmerman M, Mattia J I. Axis I diagnostic comorbidity and borderline personality disorder.  Compr Psychiatry. 1999;  40 245-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Fertuck E, Marsano-Jozefowicz S, Stanley B. et al . The impact of borderline personality disorder and anxiety on neuropsychological performance in major depression.  Journal of Personality Disorder. 2006;  20 55-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Dowson J, Bazanis E, Rogers R. et al . Impulsivity in patients with borderline personality disorder.  Compr Psychiatry. 2004;  45 29-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Patton J H, Stanford M S, Barratt E S. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale.  J Clin Psychol. 1995;  51 768-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Arntz A, Appels C, Sieswerda S. Hypervigilance in borderline disorder: a test with the emotional Stroop paradigm.  J Personal Disord. 2000;  14 366-373
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sieswerda S, Arntz A, Mertens I, Vertommen S. Hypervigilance in patients with borderline personality disorder: Specificity, automaticity, and predictors.  Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2007;  45 1011-1024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Cherek D, Dougherty D M. The relationship between provocation frequency and human aggressive responding.  Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;  111 163-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Barnow S, Schuckit M A, Lucht M. et al . The importance of a positive family history of alcoholism, parental rejection and emotional warmth, behavioral problems and peer substance use for alcohol problems in teenagers: a path analysis.  J Stud Alcohol. 2002;  63 305-315
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Wittchen H U, Pfister H. Diagnostisches Expertensystem für Psychische Störungen DIA-X. Frankfurt; Swets & Zeitlinger 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Wittchen H U, Lachner G, Wunderlich U, Pfister H. Test-retest reliability of the computerized DSM-IV version of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI).  Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 1998;  33 568-578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 First M B, Gibbon M, Spitzer R L. et al .User's guide for the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-II personality disorders (SCID-II). Washington D.C.; American Psychiatric Press 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Fydrich T, Schmitz B, Hennsch C, Bodem M. Zuverlässigkeit und Gültigkeit diagnostischer Verfahren zur Erfassung von Persönlichkeitsstörungen. In: Schmitz B, Fydrich T, Limberger K (Hrsg) Persönlichkeitsstörungen: Diagnostik und Psychotherapie. Weinheim; Psychologie Verlags Union 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Leichsenring F. Borderline-Persönlichkeits-Inventar: BPI. Göttingen; Hogrefe 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Fossati A, Di Ceglie A, Acquarini E, Barratt E S. Psychometric Properties of an Italian Version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11).  Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2001;  57 815-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Franke G H. SCL-90-R. Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis – Deutsche Version – Manual. Weinheim; Beltz 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Derogatis L. SCL-90-R, administration, scoring & procedures manual-I for the R(evised) version. John Hopkins University School of Medicine 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Franke G. Eine weitere Überprüfung der Symptom-Check-Liste (SCL-90-R, Derogatis, 1986) als Forschungsinstrument.  Diagnostica. 1992;  38 160-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Franke G, Jäger H, Thomann B, Beyer B. Assessment and evaluation of psychological distress in HIV-infected women.  Psychology and Health. 1992;  6 297-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Wechsler D. Die Messung der Intelligenz Erwachsener. Bern; Huber 1964
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Tewes U. Hamburg-Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene – Revision 1991 (HAWIE-R). Bern; Huber 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Gediga G, Schöttke H. Turm von Hanoi, Fassung Osnabrück. Göttingen; Hogrefe 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Hänsgen K-D. Handbuch TvH. In: Hänsgen K-D (Hrsg) Handbuch Hogrefe Testsystem. Göttingen; Hogrefe Verlag für Psychologie 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Bishop D VM, Aamodt-Leeper G, Creswell C. et al . Individual Differences in Cognitive Planning on the Tower of Hanoi Task: Neuropsychological Maturity or Measurement Error?.  Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines. 2001;  42 551
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Rosvolt H, Mirsky A F, Sarason I. et al . A continuous performance test of brain damage.  J Consult Psychol. 1956;  20 343-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Borgaro S, Pogge D L, DeLuca V A. et al . Convergence of Different Versions of the Continuous Performance Test: Clinical and Scientific Implications.  Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology. 2003;  25 283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Halperin J M, Sharma V, Greenblatt E, Schwartz S T. Assessment of the Continuous Performance Test: Reliability and validity in a nonreferred sample.  Psychological Assessment. 1991;  3 603-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Heaton R. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual. Odessa, Florida; Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Drühe-Wienholt C M, Wienholt W. Computergestütztes Kartensortierverfahren CKV. Frankfurt/Main; Harcourt Test Services 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Wiedl K H. Rehab Rounds: Cognitive Modifiability as a Measure of Readiness for Rehabilitation.  Psychiatr Serv. 1999;  50 1411-1419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Logan G D. On the ability to inhibit thought and action. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (Hrsg) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language. London; Academic Press 1994: 189-239
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Logan G D, Schachar R J, Tannock R. Impulsivity and inhibitory control.  Psychological Science. 1997;  8 60-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Mitchell S H. Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers.  Psychopharmacology. 1999;  146 455-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Johnson M W, Bickel W K, Baker F. Moderate Drug Use and Delay Discounting: A Comparison of Heavy, Light, and Never Smokers.  Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2007;  15 187-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Williams J M, Mathews A, MacLeod C. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.  Psychol Bull. 1996;  120 3-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Strauss G P, Allen D N, Jorgensen M L, Cramer S L. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.  Assessment. 2005;  12 330-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Siegrist M. Test-retest reliability of different versions of the Stroop test.  Journal of Psychology. 1997;  131 299-307
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Kindt M, Bierman D, Brosschot J F. Stroop versus Stroop: Comparison of a card format and a single-trial format of the standard color-word Stroop task and the emotional Stroop task.  Personality & Individual Differences. 1996;  21 653-661
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Sieswerda S, Arntz A, Wolfis M. Evaluations of emotional noninterpersonal situations by patients with borderline personality disorder.  Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2005;  36 209-225
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Linehan M. Dialektisch-behaviorale Therapie der Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung. München; CIP-Medien 1996
    Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. Sven Barnow

Psychologisches Institut, Lehrstuhl Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg

Hauptstraße 47 – 51

69117 Heidelberg

Email: sven.barnow@psychologie.uni-heidelberg.de

      >