Video-endoscopes in Comparison with Fiberscopes: Quantitative Measurement of Optical Resolution

Summary

The subject of this study was the optical performance of video-endoscopic systems (VE) in terms of maximal resolving power and resolvable picture elements. Olympus, Toshiba/Machida, Fujinon, and Welch Allyn video gastroscopes were tested. A GIF Q 10 fiberscope from Olympus was also included for comparison. The resolution measurements were made at various distances using two independent methods - electronic analysis of the TV signal, and visual evaluation of the resolution, of a standardized test target. The results obtained with the two methods were in perfect agreement.

The resolution of fine details clearly depends on the distance between the distal end and the target because of decreasing image scale. Depending on the individual optical design, the various VE's show maxima at different distances. At shorter distances, the image is degraded by defocusing. An optimal distance which is as small as possible is desired for clinical routine. Apart from the fiberscope this requirement is best met by the Fuji system. The greatest resolution is obtained with the Toshiba system but at the cost of the viewing angle which is the smallest of all the systems. Fuji combines relatively high resolution with a large viewing angle.

Because of the widely varying viewing angle a comparison based solely on resolution cannot represent the true imaging capability of the system. We therefore eliminated purely optical parameters and calculated the number of resolvable picture elements per line. We regard this number to be a fair characterization of both TV and fiber systems.

Key words:

Video-endoscopic systems - Fiberscopes - Optical resolutions