Download PDF
Suchttherapie 2017; 18(01): 34-43
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-111038
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Anreize zur Beeinflussung der individuellen Rauchentwöhnung – Ergebnisse eines „Overview of Reviews“ zu Wirksamkeitseffekten

Incentives to Influence Individual Smoking Cessation – Results from an Overview of Reviews about Effectiveness
R. Winkler
1   Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment, Wien, Österreich
,
I. Reinsperger
1   Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment, Wien, Österreich
,
M. Sprenger
2   Medizinische Universität Graz, Österreich
,
B. Piso
1   Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment, Wien, Österreich
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 August 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Anreize stellen für eine Rauchentwöhnung bzw. Tabakprävention ein spezifisches Angebot dar. Dieser Beitrag verfolgt das Ziel, die Wirksamkeit von Anreizen zu erheben.

Methodik: Die Evidenzdarstellung basiert auf einem „Overview of Reviews“. Eine systematische Literatursuche in 8 Datenbanken und eine Qualitätsbewertung der systematischen Reviews markieren das methodische Vorgehen.

Ergebnisse: 17 systematische Reviews erfüllten die Einschlusskriterien. Materielle Anreize zeigen sich in der Rauchentwöhnung (insbesondere für Schwangere und Frauen post partum) wirksam, jedoch kommt es zu einer Abflachung der Effekte nach einem Aussetzen der Anreize. Für die Gruppe der Kinder und Jugendlichen zeigen sich keine eindeutigen Präventionseffekte durch Anreize.

Schlussfolgerungen: Eine effektive Entwöhnung des Tabakkonsums bedarf einer verschränkten Vorgehensweise, die Anreize für Individuen mit präventiven Maßnahmen auf der Policy-Ebene verknüpft.

Abstract

Aims: Incentives represent a specific intervention to support smoking cessation and prevention. This paper aims at assessing the effectiveness of incentives.

Methods: The evidence is based on an overview of reviews. The methodological approach involved a systematic literature search in 8 databases and a quality assessment of the systematic reviews.

Results: 17 systematic reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Incentives have positive effects on smoking cessation (particularly for pregnant women and women post partum), effects decreased once incentives were suspended, though. There is no evidence that incentives have a preventive effect on children and adolescents.

Conclusions: Effective smoking restriction necessitates concerted actions combining incentives for individuals and preventive measures on the policy-level.

Schlüsselwörter

Anreize - Rauchen - Gesundheitsverhalten - Nikotinabstinenz - Overview of Reviews

Key words

incentives - smoking - health behaviour - nicotine abstinence - overview of reviews
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Klemperer D, von Hirschhausen E. Sozialmedizin – Public Health – Gesundheitswissenschaften. Lehrbuch für Gesundheitswissenschaften und Sozialberufe. 3. überarb. Aufl. Bern: Hogrefe; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Frazer K, Callinan Joanne E, McHugh J et al. Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2016; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub3 CD005992
    PubMed
  • 3 Chamberlain C, O’Mara-Eves A, Oliver S et al. Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub4 CD001055
    PubMed
  • 4 Spahni KH. Anreizsysteme in Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Verhaltenssteuerung durch Belohnungen: Hochschule Luzern – Soziale Arbeit. 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fischer F. Ökonomische Anreize als Instrumente der Präventionspolitik. Präv Gesundheitsf 2013; 8: 112-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Becker LA, Oxman AD. Overviews of Reviews. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd;; 2008: 607-631
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Oxman A, Guyatt G. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 1271-1278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kavanagh J, Oakley A, Harden A et al. Are incentive schemes effective in changing young people’s behaviour? A systematic review. Health Education Journal 2010; 70: 192-205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 EPPI-Centre; Social Science Research Unit; UCL Institute of Education. Kavanagh J, Trouton A et al. A systematic review of the evidence for incentive schemes to encourage positive health and other social behaviours in young people. 2006 Im Internet: https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Soskzt1sFZs%3D&tabid=671&mid=1562 Zugriff: 27.01.2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Giles EL, Robalino S, McColl E et al. The effectiveness of financial incentives for health behaviour change: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e90347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mantzari E, Vogt F, Shemilt I et al. Personal financial incentives for changing habitual health-related behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive medicine 2015; 75: 75-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bryant J, Bonevski B, Paul C et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of behavioural smoking cessation interventions in selected disadvantaged groups. Addiction 2011; 106: 1568-1585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cahill K, Hartmann-Boyce J, Perera R. Incentives for smoking cessation. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015; DOI: http://dx. doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub5 CD004307
    PubMed
  • 14 Cahill K, Lancaster T. Workplace interventions for smoking cessation. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014; DOI: http://dx. doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003440.pub4 CD003440
    PubMed
  • 15 Cahill K, Perera R. Quit and Win contests for smoking cessation. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2008; DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD004986.pub3 CD004986
    PubMed
  • 16 Johnston V, Liberato S, Thomas D. Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2012; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008645. pub2 CD008645
    PubMed
  • 17 Leeks KD, Hopkins DP, Soler RE et al. Worksite-based incentives and competitions to reduce tobacco use. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38: 263-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Likis FE, Andrews JC et al. Smoking cessation interventions in pregnancy and postpartum care. Im Internet http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190501/pdf/TOC.pdf Zugriff: 27.01.2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Morgan H, Hoddinott P, Thomson G et al. Benefits of Incentives for Breastfeeding and Smoking cessation in pregnancy (BIBS): a mixed-methods study to inform trial design. Health Technol Assess 2015; 19: 1-522 vii–viii
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Reda AA, Kotz D, Evers SMAA et al. Healthcare financing systems for increasing the use of tobacco dependence treatment. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2012; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004305.pub4 CD004305
    PubMed
  • 21 Su A, Buttenheim AM. Maintenance of smoking cessation in the postpartum period: which interventions work best in the long-term?. Matern Child Health J 2014; 18: 714-728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Tsoi D, Porwal T, Webster M et al. Interventions for smoking cessation and reduction in individuals with schizophrenia. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013; DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD007253.pub3
    PubMed
  • 23 Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA et al. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006; 101: 192-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J et al. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2006; 101: 1546-1560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mozaffarian D, Afshin A, Benowitz NL et al. Population approaches to improve diet, physical activity, and smoking habits: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 126: 1514-1563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar