Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2019; 29(01): 053-061
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668139
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

European Paediatric Surgeons' Association Survey on the Management of Pediatric Appendicitis

Augusto Zani
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2   Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Nigel J. Hall
3   Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
,
Abidur Rahman
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Francesco Morini
4   Department of Medical and Surgical Neonatology, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
,
Alessio Pini Prato
5   Pediatric Surgery, The Children Hospital, AON SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
,
Florian Friedmacher
6   Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Antti Koivusalo
7   Section of Pediatric Surgery, Children‧s Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Ernest van Heurn
8   Emma Children‧s Hospital AMC and VU University Medical Center, Paediatric Surgical Center of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Agostino Pierro
1   Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2   Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 May 2018

04 July 2018

Publication Date:
15 August 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Aim To define patterns in the management of pediatric appendicitis.

Methods A total of 169 delegates from 42 (24 European) countries completed a validated survey administered at the EUPSA 2017 annual congress.

Results In the work-up of children with suspected acute appendicitis, most surgeons rely on full blood count (92%), C-reactive protein (82%), and abdominal ultrasonography (76%), but rarely on computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance imaging. In suspected simple appendicitis, most surgeons (76%) do not perform appendectomy at night in clinically stable patients and start antibiotic preoperatively (64%), but only 15% offer antibiotic therapy alone (no appendectomy). In suspected perforated appendicitis, 96% start antibiotic preoperatively, and 92% perform an appendectomy. Presence of phlegmon/abscess is the main contraindication to immediate surgery. In case of appendix mass, most responders (75%) favor a conservative approach and perform interval appendectomy always (56%) or in selected cases (38%) between 2 and 6 months from the first episode (81%). Children with large intraperitoneal abscesses are managed by percutaneous drainage (59% responders) and by surgery (37% responders). Laparoscopy is the preferred surgical approach for both simple (89%) and perforated appendicitis (81%). Most surgeons send the appendix for histology (96%) and pus for microbiology, if present (78%). At the end of the operation, 58% irrigate the abdominal cavity only if contaminated using saline solution (93%). In selected cases, 52% leave a drain in situ.

Conclusion Some aspects of appendicitis management lack consensus, particularly appendix mass and intraperitoneal abscess. Evidence-based guidelines should be developed, which may help standardize care and improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords

appendectomy - perforated - antibiotics - children - pediatric
 

  • References

  • 1 Stringer MD. Acute appendicitis. J Paediatr Child Health 2017; 53 (11) 1071-1076
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Warner BW, Rich KA, Atherton H, Andersen CL, Kotagal UR. The sustained impact of an evidenced-based clinical pathway for acute appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2002; 11 (01) 29-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Smink DS, Finkelstein JA, Garcia Peña BM, Shannon MW, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children using a clinical practice guideline. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (03) 458-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS. , et al. Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2010; 11 (01) 79-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Santillanes G, Simms S, Gausche-Hill M. , et al. Prospective evaluation of a clinical practice guideline for diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Acad Emerg Med 2012; 19 (08) 886-893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Russell WS, Schuh AM, Hill JG. , et al. Clinical practice guidelines for pediatric appendicitis evaluation can decrease computed tomography utilization while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013; 29 (05) 568-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schok T, Simons PC, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Peters NA, Konsten JL. Prospective evaluation of the added value of imaging within the Dutch National Diagnostic Appendicitis Guideline--do we forget our clinical eye?. Dig Surg 2014; 31 (06) 436-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Willis ZI, Duggan EM, Bucher BT. , et al. Effect of a clinical practice guideline for pediatric complicated appendicitis. JAMA Surg 2016; 151 (05) e160194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Robinson JR, Avritscher EBC, Gay JC. , et al. Measuring the value of a clinical practice guideline for children with perforated appendicitis. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (01) 195-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hendriks IG, Langen RM, Janssen L, Verrijth-Wilms IM, Wouda S, Janzing HM. Does the use of diagnostic imaging reduce the rate of negative appendectomy?. Acta Chir Belg 2015; 115 (06) 393-396
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bolmers MD, van Rossem CC, Gorter RR, Bemelman WA, van Geloven AAW, Heij HA. ; Snapshot Appendicitis Collaborative Study group. Imaging in pediatric appendicitis is key to a low normal appendix percentage: a national audit on the outcome of appendectomy for appendicitis in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2018; 34 (05) 543-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chiang DT, Tan EI, Birks D. ‘To have...or not to have’. Should computed tomography and ultrasonography be implemented as a routine work-up for patients with suspected acute appendicitis in a regional hospital?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90 (01) 17-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Cunningham J, Burd C, Bond-Smith G, Kurzawinski TR. Increased use of pre-operative imaging and laparoscopy has no impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing appendicectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93 (08) 620-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zani A, Ruttenstock E, Davenport M, Ade-Ajayi N. Is there unity in Europe? First survey of EUPSA delegates on the management of gastroschisis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23 (01) 19-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Zani A, Eaton S, Hoellwarth ME. , et al. International survey on the management of esophageal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014; 24 (01) 3-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Zani A, Eaton S, Hoellwarth M. , et al. Management of pediatric inguinal hernias in the era of laparoscopy: results of an international survey. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014; 24 (01) 9-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zani A, Eaton S, Puri P. , et al; EUPSA Network. International survey on the management of necrotizing enterocolitis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2015; 25 (01) 27-33
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Zani A, Eaton S, Puri P. , et al; EUPSA Network Office. International survey on the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26 (01) 38-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zani A, Eaton S, Morini F. , et al; EUPSA Network Office. European paediatric surgeons' association survey on the management of Hirschsprung disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2017; 27 (01) 96-101
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Morini F, Zani A, Conforti A. , et al. Current management of congenital pulmonary airway malformations: A “European Pediatric Surgeons' Association” Survey. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2018; 28 (01) 1-5
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zani A, Teague WJ, Clarke SA. , et al. Can common serum biomarkers predict complicated appendicitis in children?. Pediatr Surg Int 2017; 33 (07) 799-805
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 St Peter SD, Sharp SW, Holcomb III GW, Ostlie DJ. An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (12) 2242-2245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Chen C, Botelho C, Cooper A, Hibberd P, Parsons SK. Current practice patterns in the treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196 (02) 212-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Muehlstedt SG, Pham TQ, Schmeling DJ. The management of pediatric appendicitis: a survey of North American Pediatric Surgeons. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (06) 875-879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2013; 100 (03) 322-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A. , et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167 (08) 700-707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Aspelund G, Fingeret A, Gross E. , et al. Ultrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis. Pediatrics 2014; 133 (04) 586-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Moore MM, Kulaylat AN, Hollenbeak CS, Engbrecht BW, Dillman JR, Methratta ST. Magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol 2016; 46 (06) 928-939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Thompson GC, Schuh S, Gravel J. , et al; Pediatric Emergency Research Canada. Variation in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis at canadian pediatric hospitals. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22 (07) 811-822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Nadler EP, Gaines BA. ; Therapeutic Agents Committee of the Surgical Infection Society. The Surgical Infection Society guidelines on antimicrobial therapy for children with appendicitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008; 9 (01) 75-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lee SL, Islam S, Cassidy LD, Abdullah F, Arca MJ. ; 2010 American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Clinical Trials Committee. Antibiotics and appendicitis in the pediatric population: an American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Clinical Trials Committee systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (11) 2181-2185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Castagnola E, Bandettini R, Ginocchio F. , et al. Susceptibility to antibiotics of aerobic bacteria isolated from community acquired secondary peritonitis in children: therapeutic guidelines might not always fit with and everyday experience. J Chemother 2013; 25 (04) 213-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Svensson JF, Patkova B, Almström M. , et al. Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2015; 261 (01) 67-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Minneci PC, Mahida JB, Lodwick DL. , et al. Effectiveness of patient choice in nonoperative vs surgical management of pediatric uncomplicated acute appendicitis. JAMA Surg 2016; 151 (05) 408-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Xu J, Liu YC, Adams S, Karpelowsky J. Acute uncomplicated appendicitis study: rationale and protocol for a multicentre, prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of non-operative management in children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (12) e013299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hall NJ, Eaton S, Abbo O. , et al. Appendectomy versus non-operative treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children: study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Paediatr Open 2017 1. (01). Doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000028
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Surana R, Quinn F, Puri P. Is it necessary to perform appendicectomy in the middle of the night in children?. BMJ 1993; 306 (6886): 1168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Yardeni D, Hirschl RB, Drongowski RA, Teitelbaum DH, Geiger JD, Coran AG. Delayed versus immediate surgery in acute appendicitis: do we need to operate during the night?. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (03) 464-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bhangu A. ; United Kingdom National Surgical Research Collaborative. Safety of short, in-hospital delays before surgery for acute appendicitis: multicentre cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2014; 259 (05) 894-903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Thomas DR. Conservative management of the appendix mass. Surgery 1973; 73 (05) 677-680
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hall NJ, Eaton S, Stanton MP, Pierro A, Burge DM. ; CHINA study collaborators and the Paediatric Surgery Trainees Research Network. Active observation versus interval appendicectomy after successful non-operative treatment of an appendix mass in children (CHINA study): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2 (04) 253-260
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Bradley III EL, Isaacs J. Appendiceal abscess revisited. Arch Surg 1978; 113 (02) 130-132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Brown C, Kang L, Kim ST. Percutaneous drainage of abdominal and pelvic abscesses in children. Semin Intervent Radiol 2012; 29 (04) 286-294
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP. , et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2006; 243 (01) 17-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (10) CD001546
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D. , et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2011; 254 (04) 586-590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Gasior AC, Knott EM, Holcomb III GW, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD. Patient and parental scar assessment after single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (01) 120-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Zani A, Ade-Ajayi N. Flexible-tip laparo-endoscopic surgery: a bridge to single port appendicectomy in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2011; 21 (05) 322-324
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Slater BJ, Rothenberg SS. Two-site appendectomy in children: description of technique and outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017; 27 (04) 438-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Mosdell DM, Morris DM, Fry DE. Peritoneal cultures and antibiotic therapy in pediatric perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 1994; 167 (03) 313-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Bilik R, Burnweit C, Shandling B. Is abdominal cavity culture of any value in appendicitis?. Am J Surg 1998; 175 (04) 267-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Moawad MR, Dasmohapatra S, Justin T, Keeling N. Value of intraoperative abdominal cavity culture in appendicectomy: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60 (12) 1588-1590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Al-Saadi AS, Al-Wadan AH, Hamarnah SA, Amin H. Is abandoning routine peritoneal cultures during appendectomy justified?. Saudi Med J 2007; 28 (12) 1827-1829
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Foo FJ, Beckingham IJ, Ahmed I. Intra-operative culture swabs in acute appendicitis: a waste of resources. Surgeon 2008; 6 (05) 278-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Fallon SC, Hassan SF, Larimer EL. , et al. Modification of an evidence-based protocol for advanced appendicitis in children. J Surg Res 2013; 185 (01) 273-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Magarey CJ, Chant AD, Rickford CR, Margarey JR. Peritoneal drainage and systemic antibiotics after appendicectomy. A prospective trial. Lancet 1971; 2 (7717): 179-182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Haller Jr JA, Shaker IJ, Donahoo JS, Schnaufer L, White JJ. Peritoneal drainage versus non-drainage for generalized peritonitis from ruptured appendicitis in children: a prospective study. Ann Surg 1973; 177 (05) 595-600
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Song RY, Jung K. Drain insertion after appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis based on a single-center experience. Ann Surg Treat Res 2015; 88 (06) 341-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Cheng Y, Zhou S, Zhou R. , et al. Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (02) CD010168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Iqbal CW. , et al. Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (04) 581-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Wallace J, Nwosu B, Clarke M. Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers' perceptions. BMJ Open 2012; 2 (05) 2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Letter: Outpatient follow-up after appendicectomy. Lancet 1976; 1 (7973): 1346-1347
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Ma Y, Jones G, Tay YK. , et al. Post-operative telephone review is safe and effective: prospective study - Monash outpatient review by phone trial. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88 (05) 434-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Zani A, Zani-Ruttenstock E, Eaton S, Pierro A. The value of surveys in pediatric surgery. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2015; 25 (06) 500-503
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar