Arthritis und Rheuma 2010; 30(05): 278-282
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1618028
Kinderorthopädie
Schattauer GmbH

Die Epiphyseolysis capitis femoris

To do or not to do 2010Slipped capital femoral epiphysisTo do or not to do 2010
K. Schroeder
1   Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim, Frankfurt a. M.
,
A. A. Kamand
1   Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim, Frankfurt a. M.
,
A. Meurer
1   Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim, Frankfurt a. M.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 December 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die Epiphyseolysis capitis femoris (ECF) ist die häufigste Hüftgelenkserkrankung des Adoleszenten mit einer Inzidenz von 8,3 und die häufigste mit Verzögerung gestellte Diagnose. Die Patienten sind meist adipös und großwüchsig. Es findet sich häufig ein Zusammenhang zwischen der ECF und metabolischen Erkrankungen wie Hyperparathyreoidismus, Hypogonadismus und Wachstumshormonmangel. Die ECF wird in eine stabile und eine instabile Form eingeteilt. Weitere Einteilungen orientieren sich an der Dauer seit Beginn der Symptome oder dem Abrutschwinkel. Die Patienten klagen in der Regel über milde unspezifische Schmerzen in Hüfte und Knie. Röntgenaufnahmen des Beckens sowie die Lauenstein-Aufnahmen beider Hüftgelenke sichern die Diagnose. Das Ziel der Behandlung ist sowohl die Prävention einer fortschreitenden Lyse als auch der Folgeschäden wie der Osteonekrose, der Chondrolyse und der Arthrose. Die Therapie ist immer operativ und besteht entweder in einem „in situ pinning“ mit Kirschnerdrähten oder kanülierten Schrauben, einer Imhäuser-Osteotomie oder einer chirurgischen Hüftluxation mit subkapitaler Korrekturosteotomie zur Reposition der Epiphyse.

Summary

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is the most common hip disorder in adolescents with a prevalence of 8.3 cases in 100 000 patients and is one of the most commonly missed diagnoses. The physical condition is obesity and growth surges, and the disease is occasionally associated with endocrine disorders like hyperparathyroidism, hypogonadism and growth hormone deficiency. The disease is classified in stable and unstable according to the stability of the physis, according the duration of symptoms or by the amount of slip. Patients usually present with mild pain in hip or knee. Diagnose is confirmed by anteriorposterior and frog-leg lateral views of both hips. The aim of treatment is the prevention of progression of slips and preventation of complications which are femoral head necrosis, chondrolysis and osteoarthrosis. Treatment options range from in situ pinning with Kirschner wires or screw, Imhäuser procedure to surgical hip dislocation with subcapital correction osteotomy.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Aronson DD, Carlson WE. Slipped femoral capital epiphysis in black children. J Ped Orthop 1992; 12: 74-79.
  • 2 Azzopardi T, Sharma S, Bennet GC. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in children aged less than 10 years. J Pediatr Orthop Br 2010; 19 (01) 13-18.
  • 3 Bennet Koresha GCJ, Rand M. Pin placement in SFCE. J Pediatr Orthop 1984; 4: 574-578.
  • 4 Carney BT, Weinstein Sl, Noble J. Long-term follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1991; 73: 667-674.
  • 5 Castro Jr FP, Bennett JT, Doulens K. Epidemiological perspective on prophylactic pinning in patients with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2000; 20 (06) 745-748.
  • 6 Dunn DM. The treatment of adolescent slipping of the upper femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1964; 46: 621-629.
  • 7 Hägglund G. The contralateral hip in slipped femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 1996; 5 (B): 158-161.
  • 8 Hansson G, Billing L, Högstedt B. et al. Long-term results after nailing in situ of slipped upper femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80 (B): 70-77.
  • 9 Herrera-Soto JA, Duffy MF, Birnbaum MA, Vander Have KL. Increased intracapsular pressures after unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2008; 28 (07) 723-728.
  • 10 Imhäuser G. Die operative Behandlung der pathologischen Antetorsion am coxalen Femurende. Z Orthop 1954; 85: 395-405.
  • 11 Jerre R, Billing L, Hansson G, Wallin J. The contralateral hip in patients primarily treated for unilateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis. Long-term follow up of 61 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76: 563-567.
  • 12 Jones JR, Paterson DC, Hillier TM, Foster BK. Remodelling after pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72 (04) 568-573.
  • 13 Kartenbender K, Cordier W, Katthagen BD. Long-term follow-up study after corrective Imhäuser osteotomy for severe slipped femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2000; 20 (06) 749-756.
  • 14 Krauspe R, Seller K, Westhoff B. Epiphyseolysis capitis femoris. Z Orthop 2004; 142 (05) R37-R57.
  • 15 Leunig M, Casillas MM, Hamlet M. et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (04) 370-375.
  • 16 Loder RT, Richards BS, Shapiro PS. et al. Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stability. J Bone J Surg (Am) 1993; 75: 1134-1140.
  • 17 Loder RT, Wittenberg B, DeSilva G. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with endocrine disorders. J Pediatr Orthop 1995; 15 (A): 349-356.
  • 18 Maussen JP, Rozing PM, Obermann WR. Intertrochanteric corrective osteotomy in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A long-term follow-up study of 26 patients. Clin Orthop 1990; 259: 100-110.
  • 19 Palocaren T, Holmes L, Rogers K, Kumar SJ. Outcome of in situ pinning in patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: assessment of risk factors associated with avascular necrosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2010; 30 (01) 31-36.
  • 20 Schultz WR, Weinstein JN, Weinstein SL, Smith BG. Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: evaluation of long-term outcome for the contralateral hip with use of decision analysis. J Bone J Surg Am 2002; 84 (A): 1305-1314.
  • 21 Seller K, Raab P, Wild A, Krauspe R. Risk-benefit analysis of prophylactic pinning in slipped capital epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 10 (B): 192-196.
  • 22 Southwick WO. Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1967; 49: 807-835.
  • 23 Stanitski CL, Woo R, Stanitski DF. Femoral version in acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pedriatr Orthop 1996; 5 (B): 74-76.
  • 24 Stanitski CL, Woo R, Stanitski DF. Acetabular version in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A prospective study. J Pedriatr Orthop 1996; 5 (B): 77-79.
  • 25 Tokmakova KP, Stanton RP, Mason DE. Factors influencing the development of osteonecrosis in patients treated for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone J Surg Am 2003; 85-A (05) 798-801.
  • 26 Weiner D. Pathogenesis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Current concepts. J Pediatr Orthop 1996; 5 (B): 63-67.
  • 27 Wells D, King JD, Roe TF, Kaufmann FR. Review of slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with endocrine disease. J Pediatr Orthop 1993; 13 (A): 610-614.
  • 28 Yildirim Y, Bautista S, Davidson RS. Chondrolysis, osteonecrosis, and slip severity in patients with subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (03) 485-492.