Quality Measurement in Neonatal Surgical Disorders: Development of Clinical Indicators

Abstract

Objective This study aims to develop a set of quality indicators for the measurement of the quality of surgical care for neonates with surgical disorders.

Methods An expert panel of the Netherlands Association of Pediatric Surgeons developed internal (clinical) indicators for neonatal surgery. This included the selection of appropriate care processes, a review of the scientific literature, consensus meetings to establish national guidelines, selection of clinical indicators with independent external evaluation, the setup of a national database, and a pilot study in one of the hospitals to evaluate the defined quality indicators in clinical practice.

Results Seven neonatal surgical care processes were selected. Clinical guidelines to evaluate the care processes were established in six of seven disorders and were based on consensus agreement, which was reached in 81 to 97% of in total 220 relevant items. The expert panel selected a set of 24 indicators to estimate the quality of neonatal surgical care, of which 12 were outcome indicators and 12 process indicators.

Conclusion The development of quality indicators is an important step toward monitoring and, if necessary, improving the quality of neonatal surgical care. Internal or clinical indicators guarantee that the results are only disclosed to the participating center itself and are therefore no threat to individual doctors.

Keywords

quality - pediatric surgery - indicators

• References

• 1 McGlynn EA, Kerr EA, Adams J, Keesey J, Asch SM. Quality of health care for women: a demonstration of the quality assessment tools system. Med Care 2003; 41 (5) 616-625
• 2 Steinberg EP. Improving the quality of care—can we practice what we preach?. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 (26) 2681-2683
• 3 Wang CJ, McGlynn EA, Brook RH , et al. Quality-of-care indicators for the neurodevelopmental follow-up of very low birth weight children: results of an expert panel process. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (6) 2080-2092
• 4 Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall MN. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ 2003; 326 (7393) 816-819
• 5 Heuschmann PU, Biegler MK, Busse O , et al. Development and implementation of evidence-based indicators for measuring quality of acute stroke care: the Quality Indicator Board of the German Stroke Registers Study Group (ADSR). Stroke 2006; 37 (10) 2573-2578
• 6 Wollersheim H, Hermens R, Hulscher M , et al. Clinical indicators: development and applications. Neth J Med 2007; 65 (1) 15-22
• 7 Scanlon MC, Harris II JM, Levy F, Sedman A. Evaluation of the agency for healthcare research and quality pediatric quality indicators. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (6) e1723-e1731
• 8 Stang AS, Straus SE, Crotts J, Johnson DW, Guttmann A. Quality indicators for high acuity pediatric conditions. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (4) 752-762
• 9 Yiee JH, Saigal CS, Lai J, Copp HL, Churchill BM, Litwin MS ; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Timing of orchiopexy in the United States: a quality-of-care indicator. Urology 2012; 80 (5) 1121-1126
• 10 Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311 (7001) 376-380
• 11 Ahaus CTB, Heer de A, Swinkels WKJ. ISO 9000:2000-series, strategy and handling. 4th ed. Deventer: Kluwer; 2001
• 12 http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp
• 13 Van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Henneman D , et al; Dutch Surgical Colorectal Cancer Audit Group. The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39 (10) 1063-1070
• 14 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Quality indicators (QI). Available at: http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/ . Accessed November 22, 2014
• 15 Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J, Durie A, Thapar A, Roland MO. Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11 (2) 125-130
• 16 Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 2011; 6 (6) e20476
• 17 Werner RM, Asch DA. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA 2005; 293 (10) 1239-1244
• 18 Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Cleary PD. Quality of health care. Part 2: measuring quality of care. N Engl J Med 1996; 335 (13) 966-970
• 19 Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966; 44 (3) 166-206
• 20 Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q 2005; 83 (4) 691-729
• 21 Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A , et al. Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (10) 1521-1526
• 22 Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold MR, Clancy CM. Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA 2000; 283 (19) 2579-2584
• 23 Kuhlthau K, Ferris TG, Iezzoni LI. Risk adjustment for pediatric quality indicators. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (1 Pt 2) 210-216
• 24 Dimick JB, Welch HG, Birkmeyer JD. Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. JAMA 2004; 292 (7) 847-851