Ultraschall Med 2011; 32: E80-E85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273319
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Reliabilität der Introitussonografie nach Einlage eines spannungsfreien Vaginalbands nach dem TVT-Verfahren

Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Introital Ultrasound after Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) ProcedureA. Reich1 , R. Muche2 , K. Wiesner1 , R. Kreienberg1 , F. Flock3
  • 1Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm
  • 2Institute for Biometry, University of Ulm
  • 3Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical center of Memmingen
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

eingereicht: 17.11.2010

angenommen: 15.3.2011

Publikationsdatum:
25. Mai 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Wir untersuchten die Interrater- und Intrarater-Reliabilität der Introitussonografie bei Patientinnen nach TVT-Implantation. Material und Methoden: Bei 202 Patientinnen konnte die Position und Form des Bandes bestimmt werden. Die Bandposition wurde charakterisiert durch die Relation der Distanz zwischen Blasenausgang und Band zur Urethralänge (%) und durch den Abstand zwischen Band und Urethra (mm). Die Übereinstimmung wurde durch den Intra-Klassen-Korrelation (ICC) und Kappa-Koeffizient (KK) ermittelt. Ergebnisse: Für die Intrarater-Reliabilität konnte bei der Beurteilung der Bandposition (Ruhe ICC 0,90, Valsalva ICC 0,96) und des Abstands in Ruhe (ICC 0,83), aber nicht beim Pressen (ICC 0,74) eine gute Reproduzierbarkeit ermittelt werden. Bei der Bandform wurde eine Übereinstimmung von 81 % (Ruhe) und 79 % (Pressen) ermittelt. Der KK war mit 0,68 und 0,6 relativ gering. Die Interrater-Reliabilität war gut bei der Bestimmung der Bandposition (Ruhe ICC 0,93, Pressen ICC 0,89) und des Abstands (Ruhe ICC 0,89, Pressen ICC 0,87). Bei der Bandform zeigte sich eine geringe Übereinstimmung (Ruhe 71 %, Pressen 72 %). Schlussfolgerung: Die Introitussonografie in der midsagittalen Ebene zeigt eine gute Reproduzierbarkeit der sonografischen Bandcharakterisierung hinsichtlich Position und Abstand.

Abstract

Purpose: To date, the evaluation of TVT by ultrasound has not been standardized. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver variability of introital ultrasound. Materials and Methods: Follow-up was performed for 202 patients after TVT procedure. The tape was characterized by the position in relation to urethral length (%) and the distance to the hypoechoic center of the urethra (mm). Furthermore, we assessed the shape of the tape (straight, curved or folded). All evaluations were performed by two experienced examiners (A, B) at rest and during Valsalva maneuver. All sonograms were archived digitally without measurement results. After 6 to 12 months, the sonograms were re-evaluated by one investigator (A). Depending on the first investigator, the results were compared as intraobserver (A-A) or interobserver (B-A) agreement. The first results were blinded for the second measurement. Agreement concerning the distances was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The concordance of the descriptive evaluation of the shape of the tape was characterized by the kappa coefficient (KC). Results: The tape was regularly identified as an echogenic structure dorsal to the urethra. The intraobserver reliability concerning the position of the tape in relation to urethral length showed good reproducibility (at rest ICC 0.90, Valsalva maneuver: ICC 0.96). For the distance between the tape and the urethra at rest (ICC 0.83), there was also good reproducibility, but not during Valsalva maneuver (ICC 0.74). The shape of the tape showed only moderate reproducibility with accordance of 81 % at rest (KC 0.68) and of 79 % during Valsalva maneuver (KC 0.6). The interobserver comparisons showed good concordance in measuring the POS at rest (ICC 0.93), and during Valsalva maneuver (ICC 0.89), and the DIS at rest (ICC 0.89), and during Valsalva maneuver (ICC 0.87). The congruence of the estimation of the shape was 71 % at rest (KC 0.44) and 72 % during Valsalva maneuver (KC 0.49). Conclusion: The characterization of the TVT in the sagittal view by introital ultrasound shows good reproducibility with respect to position and distance, but not shape.

Literatur

  • 1 Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P et al. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence.  Int Urogynecol J. 1996;  7 81-87
  • 2 Nilson C G, Palva K, Rezapour M et al. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.  Int Urogynecol J. 2008;  19 1043-1047
  • 3 Tunn R, Schaer G, Peschers U et al. Updated recommendations on ultrasonography in urogynecology.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;  16 236-241
  • 4 Flock F, Kohorst F, Kreienberg R et al. Ultrasound assessment of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT).  Ultraschall in Med. (in press)
  • 5 Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M. A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.  Brit J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;  106 345-350
  • 6 Hartnell G G, Kiely E A, Williams G et al. Real-time ultrasound measurement of bladder volume: a comparative study of three methods.  Br J Radiol. 1987;  60 1063-1065
  • 7 Schaer G N, Schmid T, Peschers U et al. Intraurethral ultrasound correlated with urethral histology.  Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  91 60-64
  • 8 Bland M JM, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  8 / 1 307-310
  • 9 Virtanen H S, Kiilholma P. Urogynecologic ultrasound is a useful aid in the assessment of female stress urinary incontinence – a prospective study with TVT procedure.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;  13 218-222
  • 10 Lo T S, Wang A C, Horng S G et al. Ultrasonographic and urodynamic evaluation after tension free vagina tape procedure (TVT).  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;  80 65-70
  • 11 Masata J, Martan A, Svabik K et al. Ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract after successful tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  28 221-228
  • 12 Viereck V, Nebel M, Bader W et al. Role of bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure in predicting outcome of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  28 214-220
  • 13 Harms L, Emons G, Bader W et al. Funneling before and after anti-incontinence surgery – a prognostic indicator? Part 2: tension-free vaginal tape.  Int Urogynecol J. 2007;  18 289-294
  • 14 Schuettoff S, Beyersdorff D, Gauruder-Burmester A et al. Visibility of the polypropylene tape after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure in women with stress urinary incontinence: comparison of introital ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in vitro and in vivo.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  27 687-692
  • 15 Dietz H P, Mouritzen L, Ellis G et al. Does the tension-free vaginal tape stay where you put it?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  188 950-953
  • 16 Dietz H P, Wilson P D. The „iris effect“: how two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound can help us understand anti-incontinence procedures.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  23 267-271
  • 17 Dietz H P, Mouritsen L, Ellis G et al. How important is TVT location?.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;  83 904-908
  • 18 Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D et al. Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery.  Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;  27 485-490
  • 19 Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Kolben S et al. Tape functionality: position, change in shape, and outcome after TVT procedure – mid-term results.  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;  21 795-800
  • 20 Kociszewski J, Bagci S. Sonography with regard to urethral length before and after placement of tension-free vaginal tape.  Geburth Frauenheilk. 2003;  63 640-647
  • 21 Lo T S, Horng S G, Liang C G et al. Ultrasound assessment of mid-urethra tape at three-year follow-up after tension-free vaginal tape procedure.  Urology. 2004;  63 671-675

Dr. Andreas Reich

Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, Universität Ulm

Prittwitzstr. 43

89075 Ulm

Telefon:  ++ 49/7 31/50 05 85 01

Fax:  ++ 49/7 31/5 00  5 85 02

eMail: andreas.reich@uniklinik-ulm.de

    >