RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2743-4868
Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Surgery: From Diagnostics and Preoperative Planning to Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications
Autor*innen
Abstract
Objective
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored in pediatric surgical care, yet its translation into diagnostics and preoperative planning lags behind adult surgery. Unlike prior reviews, this study provides a comprehensive synthesis across four domains, diagnostics, preoperative planning, risk stratification, and surgical error prevention, highlighting recent advances and unmet challenges.
Methods
A narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE (2020–2025) identified peer-reviewed studies on AI in pediatric surgery. Eligible articles addressed one of the four domains and were assessed for methodology, clinical applicability, and relevance to pediatric surgical patients.
Results
Diagnostic imaging is the most advanced field, with deep learning models for fracture detection and bone age assessment achieving accuracies up to 95% and near-expert agreement, though external validation is scarce. Preoperative planning benefits from AI-driven segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and virtual reality, with reports of altered surgical strategy in up to 8% of oncology cases, but evidence of outcome benefit is limited. Risk models for appendicitis and congenital heart surgery often surpass clinical scores, yet fewer than 10% have undergone external validation. Tools for error prevention, such as intelligent checklists and workflow monitoring, remain at the proof-of-concept stage. Across domains, most studies are retrospective, single-center, and methodologically heterogeneous.
Conclusion
AI demonstrates tangible potential to improve pediatric surgical diagnostics, planning, and safety. However, translation into clinical practice requires multicenter pediatric datasets, prospective validation, and transparent, interpretable models. By consolidating the most recent evidence across four domains, this review outlines both the opportunities and critical gaps that should be addressed for safe and effective adoption.
Keywords
surgical diagnostics - preoperative planning - risk stratification - pediatric surgery - artificial intelligencePublikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 14. Oktober 2025
Angenommen: 08. November 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Bianco A, Al-Azzawi ZAM, Guadagno E, Osmanlliu E, Gravel J, Poenaru D. Use of machine learning in pediatric surgical clinical prediction tools: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 2023; 58 (05) 908-916
- 2 Elahmedi M, Sawhney R, Guadagno E, Botelho F, Poenaru D. The state of artificial intelligence in pediatric surgery: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59 (05) 774-782
- 3 Tsai AY, Carter SR, Greene AC. Artificial intelligence in pediatric surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg 2024; 33 (01) 151390
- 4 Buser MAD, van der Rest JK, Wijnen MHWA. et al. Deep learning and multidisciplinary imaging in pediatric surgical oncology: a scoping review. Cancer Med 2025; 14 (02) e70574
- 5 Chekmeyan M, Liu S-H. Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review. Am J Emerg Med 2025; 92: 18-31
- 6 Ng CKC. Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection and diagnosis in pediatric radiology: a systematic review. Children (Basel) 2023; 10 (03) 525
- 7 Ashworth E, Allan E, Pauling C, Laidlow-Singh H, Arthurs OJ, Shelmerdine SC. Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiological paediatric fracture assessment: an updated systematic review. Eur Radiol 2025; 35 (09) 5264-5286
- 8 Ziegner M, Pape J, Lacher M. et al. Real-life benefit of artificial intelligence-based fracture detection in a pediatric emergency department. Eur Radiol 2025; 35 (10) 5881-5890
- 9 Gräfe D, Beeskow AB, Pfäffle R, Rosolowski M, Chung TS, DiFranco MD. Automated bone age assessment in a German pediatric cohort: agreement between an artificial intelligence software and the manual Greulich and Pyle method. Eur Radiol 2024; 34 (07) 4407-4413
- 10 van Leeuwen KG, Schalekamp S, Rutten MJCM, van Ginneken B, de Rooij M. Artificial intelligence in radiology: 100 commercially available products and their scientific evidence. Eur Radiol 2021; 31 (06) 3797-3804
- 11 Spijkerboer KGP, Fitski M, Siepel FJ, van de Ven CP, van der Steeg AFW. Augmented reality-guided localization of a chest wall tumor in a pediatric patient. Eur J Cancer 2022; 170: 103-105
- 12 Şener A, Ergen B. Automatic detection of gastrointestinal system abnormalities using deep learning-based segmentation and classification methods. Health Inf Sci Syst 2025; 13 (01) 37
- 13 Ejaz H, Thyyib T, Ibrahim A, Nishat A, Malay J. Role of artificial intelligence in early detection of congenital heart diseases in neonates. Front Digit Health 2024; 5: 1345814
- 14 Qamar A, Bangi SF, Barve R. Artificial intelligence applications in diagnosing and managing non-syndromic craniosynostosis: a comprehensive review. Cureus 2023; 15 (09) e45318
- 15 Harrison LM, Edison RL, Hallac RR. Artificial intelligence applications in pediatric craniofacial surgery. Diagnostics (Basel) 2025; 15 (07) 829
- 16 Males I, Boban Z, Kumric M. et al. Applying an explainable machine learning model might reduce the number of negative appendectomies in pediatric patients with a high probability of acute appendicitis. Sci Rep 2024; 14 (01) 12772
- 17 Rey R, Gualtieri R, La Scala G, Posfay Barbe K. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in pediatric departments: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2024; 34 (05) 385-391
- 18 Aydin E, Türkmen İU, Namli G. et al. A novel and simple machine learning algorithm for preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2020; 36 (06) 735-742
- 19 Abu-Ashour W, Emil S, Poenaru D. Using artificial intelligence to label free-text operative and ultrasound reports for grading pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59 (05) 783-790
- 20 Maleš I, Kumrić M, Huić Maleš A. et al. A systematic integration of artificial intelligence models in appendicitis management: a comprehensive review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2025; 15 (07) 866
- 21 Cui K, Changrong S, Maomin Y, Hui Z, Xiuxiang L. Development of an artificial intelligence-based multimodal model for assisting in the diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis in newborns: a retrospective study. Front Pediatr 2024 12.
- 22 Kim SH, Oh YJ, Son J. et al. Machine learning-based analysis for prediction of surgical necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants using perinatal factors: a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Pediatr 2024; 183 (06) 2743-2751
- 23 Li Y, Wu K, Yang H. et al. Surgical prediction of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis based on radiomics and clinical information. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49 (04) 1020-1030
- 24 Gnatzy R, Lacher M, Cascio S, Münsterer O, Wagner R, Aubert O. Pediatric surgical trainees and artificial intelligence: a comparative analysis of DeepSeek, Copilot, Google Bard and pediatric surgeons' performance on the European Pediatric Surgical In-Training Examinations (EPSITE). Pediatr Surg Int 2025; 41 (01) 247
- 25 Bakhuis W, Kersten CM, Sadeghi AH. et al. Preoperative visualization of congenital lung abnormalities: hybridizing artificial intelligence and virtual reality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 63 (01) ezad014
- 26 Banerjee A, Babu R, Jayaraman D, Chilukuri S. Preoperative three-dimensional modelling and virtual reality planning aids nephron sparing surgery in a child with bilateral Wilms tumour. BMJ Case Rep 2024; 17 (04) e260600
- 27 Bramlet M, Aprahamian CJ, Jeziorczak PM. et al. Virtual reality for preoperative surgical planning in complex pediatric oncology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34 (09) 861-865
- 28 Robertson DJ, Abramson ZR, Davidoff AM, Bramlet MT. Virtual reality applications in pediatric surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg 2024; 33 (01) 151387
- 29 Liu G, Zhai X, Song X, Chen B, Kang Q. The application of virtual simulation teaching in the education of pediatric acute intussusception. J Surg Educ 2025; 82 (08) 103536
- 30 Korzeniowski P, Chacon CS, Russell VR, Clarke SA, Bello F. Virtual reality simulator for pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 31 (11) 1322-1330
- 31 Pelizzo G, Pierucci UM, Marinaro M. et al. Virtual reality for preoperative planning and education in pediatric surgery: preliminary results for the treatment of congenital malformations and tumors. World J Surg 2025; 49 (06) 1497-1507
- 32 Esposito C, Autorino G, Iervolino A. et al. Efficacy of a virtual reality program in pediatric surgery to reduce anxiety and distress symptoms in the preoperative phase: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2022; 32 (02) 197-203
- 33 Ryan ML, Wang S, Pandya SR. Integrating artificial intelligence into the visualization and modeling of three-dimensional anatomy in pediatric surgical patients. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59 (12) 161629
- 34 Huang H, Wu Y. A deep learning-based method for rapid 3D whole-heart modeling in congenital heart disease. Cardiology 2025; 150 (03) 243-258
- 35 Francoisse CA, Sescleifer AM, King WT, Lin AY. Three-dimensional printing in medicine: a systematic review of pediatric applications. Pediatr Res 2021; 89 (03) 415-425
- 36 Shalev S, Ben-Sira L, Wasserzug O, Shaylor R, Shiran SI, Ekstein M. Utility of three-dimensional modeling of the fetal airway for ex utero intrapartum treatment. J Anesth 2021; 35 (04) 595-598
- 37 Wang P, Gong Y, Lu S, Chen J. Three-dimensional visualization technique compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for evaluation of anatomic variants of pediatric congenital choledochal cysts. Pediatr Surg Int 2021; 37 (06) 705-713
- 38 Youn JK, Lee D, Ko D. et al. Augmented reality-based visual cue for guiding central catheter insertion in pediatric oncologic patients. World J Surg 2022; 46 (04) 942-948
- 39 Gnatzy R, Lacher M, Berger M. et al. Solving complex pediatric surgical case studies: a comparative analysis of Copilot, ChatGPT-4, and experienced pediatric surgeons' performance. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2025; 35 (05) 382-389
- 40 Tong C, Du X, Chen Y. et al. Machine learning prediction model of major adverse outcomes after pediatric congenital heart surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110 (04) 2207-2216
- 41 Zeng X, Hu Y, Shu L. et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for complications after pediatric congenital heart surgery. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 17244
- 42 Mohammadi I, Rajai Firouzabadi S, Hosseinpour M. et al. Using artificial intelligence to predict post-operative outcomes in congenital heart surgeries: a systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2024; 24 (01) 718
- 43 Zachos K, Fouzas S, Kolonitsiou F. et al. Prediction of complicated appendicitis risk in children. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2021; 25 (23) 7346-7353
- 44 Alramadhan MM, Al Khatib HS, Murphy JR, Tsao K, Chang ML. Using Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Intra-Abdominal Abscess Risk Post-Appendectomy. Ann Surg Open 2022; 3 (02) e168
- 45 Chantakhow S, Tepmalai K, Tantraworasin A, Khorana J. Development of prediction model for Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) in postoperative Hirschsprung patients. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59 (12) 161696
- 46 Guo J-Y, Qian Y-F. Predicting recurrent cases of intussusception in children after air enema reduction with machine learning models. Pediatr Surg Int 2022; 39 (01) 9
- 47 Chen Y, Ge X-H, Yu Q. et al. Prediction model for urinary tract infection in pediatric urological surgery patients. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 888089
- 48 Zhang X, Sun D, Zhou Y. et al. Predicting complications after laparoscopic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction using machine learning models: a retrospective cohort study. World J Urol 2025; 43 (01) 178
- 49 Kasundra A, Chanchlani R, Lal B. et al. Role of artificial intelligence in the assessment of postoperative pain in the pediatric population: a systematic review. Cureus 2025; 17 (01) e77074
- 50 Nyholm I, Hukkinen M, Pakarinen MP. Predicting and managing liver fibrosis in biliary atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2024; 33 (06) 151473
- 51 De Francesco D, Reiss JD, Roger J. et al. Data-driven longitudinal characterization of neonatal health and morbidity. Sci Transl Med 2023; 15 (683) eadc9854
- 52 Rogers MP, Janjua H, DeSantis AJ, Grimsley E, Pietrobon R, Kuo PC. Machine learning refinement of the NSQIP risk calculator: who survives the “Hail Mary” case?. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234 (04) 652-659
- 53 Dundaru-Bandi D, Antel R, Ingelmo P. Advances in pediatric perioperative care using artificial intelligence. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2024; 37 (03) 251-258
- 54 Endo Y, Tokuyasu T, Mori Y. et al. Impact of AI system on recognition for anatomical landmarks related to reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (07) 5752-5759
- 55 Abo-Zahhad M, El-Malek AHA, Sayed MS, Gitau SN. Minimization of occurrence of retained surgical items using machine learning and deep learning techniques: a review. BioData Min 2024; 17 (01) 17
- 56 Yamaguchi S, Soyama A, Ono S. et al. Novel computer-aided diagnosis software for the prevention of retained surgical items. J Am Coll Surg 2021; 233 (06) 686-696
- 57 Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR. et al; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (05) 491-499
- 58 Yu X, Wang Z, Wu J, Weng D. Artificial intelligence-based perioperative safety verification system improved the performance of surgical safety verification execution. Am J Transl Res 2024; 16 (04) 1295-1305
- 59 Al Abbas AI, Meier J, Daniel W. et al. Impact of team performance on the surgical safety checklist on patient outcomes: an operating room black box analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (10) 5613-5622
- 60 Wijnberge M, Geerts BF, Hol L. et al. Effect of a machine learning-derived early warning system for intraoperative hypotension vs standard care on depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension during elective noncardiac surgery: the HYPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020; 323 (11) 1052-1060
- 61 Gordon L, Grantcharov T, Rudzicz F. Explainable artificial intelligence for safe intraoperative decision support. JAMA Surg 2019; 154 (11) 1064-1065
- 62 Jung JJ, Jüni P, Lebovic G, Grantcharov T. First-year analysis of the operating room black box study. Ann Surg 2020; 271 (01) 122-127
