Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2701-6697
Original Article

A Survey of Program Directors on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship Training in the US: Programmatic Structure, Learning Environment, and Wellness Activities

1   Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12308)
,
Kristen Glass
2   Department of Pediatrics, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12310)
,
Elizabeth Hillman
3   Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12339)
,
Cynthia Crabtree
4   Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12254)
,
Christie J. Bruno
5   Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12228)
,
6   Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12353)
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Objective: We aim to describe the current programmatic structure and learning environment of US Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) fellowship programs. Study Design: All US NPM program directors (PD) and associate program directors (APD) were surveyed. Descriptive statistics for quantitative questions and thematic qualitative analysis of free-text responses were used to summarize findings. Results: 99/102 (97%) of programs responded. 25/99 (25%) of PDs reported not receiving minimum ACGME Full-Time Equivalnet (FTE) for program administration. Fellows perform a median of 52 weeks (48-54) and 150 (120-165) night calls during training, with clinical time skewing more towards the first year. All programs report interaction with front-line clinicians (FLC), and 81% (80/99) of fellowships reported conflict between fellows and FLCs. A minority of programs formally evaluated or instructed FLCs on teaching skills. PDs and APDs most commonly lead the planning of wellness activities, with only 37% of programs describing a fellow wellness leader. A minority of programs reported wellness committees on the university (40%), department (19%), or division (17%) level. 25% of programs reported no wellness budget. Conclusion: Broadened institutional support towards program requirements and administration and further collaborative efforts with trainees and multidisciplinary providers are opportunities for growth in NPM fellowship programs.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 07. Mai 2025

Angenommen nach Revision: 15. September 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
16. September 2025

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor , NY 10001 New York, USA