Welche Faktoren beeinflussen die motorischen Funktionsveränderungen bei Schlaganfall-Patienten während einer neurologischen Rehabilitationsbehandlung?

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie Identifikation von Faktoren, die bei Schlaganfall-Patienten Einfluss auf das Ausmaß von motorischen Funktionsverbesserungen während einer stationären neurologischen Rehabilitation nehmen.

Methodik Retrospektive Analyse von 398 Schlaganfall-Patienten, die sich in stationärer Phase C- Rehabilitation (Barthel-Index zwischen 30 und 70 Punkten) befanden. Veränderungen in 3 physiotherapeutischen (Sitz/Stand; Transfer Bett/Stuhl; Treppen steigen) und 3 ergotherapeutischen (Essen/Trinken; Oberkörper Ankleiden; Objekt Manipulieren) Assessments wurden mit den Faktoren Alter, Geschlecht, initialer Barthel-Index, Zeit seit Schlaganfall, Aufenthaltsdauer; Therapie-Anzahl und –Umfang, Ischämie versus Blutung korreliert und einer schrittweisen Regressionsanalyse unterzogen.

Ergebnisse In allen Assessments zeigten sich signifikante Verbesserungen. Die Aufenthaltsdauer und Therapie-Anzahl und –Umfang korrelierten mit Verbesserungen von Sitz/Stand, Bett/Stuhl, Treppe und Oberkörper ankleiden, zudem korrelierten Therapie-Anzahl und –Umfang mit Essen/Trinken. Der initiale Barthel-Index korrelierte negativ mit Sitz/Stand, Bett/Stuhl und Oberkörper ankleiden. Alter und Geschlecht hatten keinen Einfluss auf das Ausmaß der Verbesserungen. Der Vergleich Ischämie versus Blutung ergab keine Unterschiede im Ausmaß der Verbesserungen. Patienten<3 Monate nach Schlaganfall verbesserten sich stärker in Sitz/Stand, Bett/Stuhl, Treppe, Oberkörper ankleiden und Objekt manipulieren als Patienten>6 Monate nach Schlaganfall, waren aber auch durchschnittlich 10 Tage (52 versus 42 Tage) länger in stationärer Rehabilitation. Eine schrittweise Regressionsanalyse identifizierte die Faktoren Physio-Termin-Anzahl und initialer Barthel-Index als wichtigste für Veränderungen in Sitz/Stand und Bett/Stuhl, Physio-Therapie-Menge und Zeit seit Schlaganfall für Treppen steigen, Ergo-Termin-Anzahl für Essen/Trinken, Ergo-Termin-Anzahl und Zeit seit Schlaganfall für Oberkörper ankleiden und Ergo-Termin-Anzahl und Dauer des Aufenthaltes für Objekt manipulieren.

Schlussfolgerung Bei Schlaganfall-Patienten ist eine größere Therapiemenge mit stärkeren motorischen Funktionsverbesserungen assoziiert. Alter, Geschlecht und Ätiologie des Schlaganfalls haben keinen relevanten Einfluss auf motorische Verbesserungen im Rahmen einer stationären Rehabilitation.

Abstract

Purpose To identify factors that have an impact on the degree of functional improvements in stroke patients during inpatient neurological rehabilitation.

Methods Retrospective analysis of 398 stroke patients who participated in an inpatient Phase C rehabilitation (Barthel index between 30 and 70 points). We correlated changes in 3 physiotherapeutic assessments (transfer from sitting to standing; transfer from bed to (wheel)chair; climbing stairs) and 3 occupational therapeutic assessments (eating/drinking; dressing of the upper part of the body; object manipulation) with the factors age, gender, Barthel-Index at admission, time since stroke, length of stay in inpatient rehab, number and extent of therapies and ischemic versus hemorrhagic stroke. In addition, a stepwise regression analysis was performed.

Results The patient group showed significant improvements in all assessments. Length of stay in inpatient rehab and number/extent of therapies correlated with improvements of transfer from sitting to standing, transfer from bed to (wheel)chair, climbing stairs, and dressing of the upper part of the body. Number/extent of therapies also correlated with eating/drinking. Barthel-Index at admission was negatively correlated with transfer from sitting to standing, transfer from bed to (wheel)chair, and dressing of the upper part of the body. No correlation between changes of motor functions and age or gender or type of stroke (ischemic versus hemorrhagic) was found. Patients<3 months after stroke showed stronger improvements of transfer from sitting to standing, transfer from bed to (wheel)chair, climbing stairs, dressing of the upper part of the body, and object manipulation than patients>6 months after stroke. However, patients<3 months after stroke also stayed 10 days longer in inpatient rehab. The stepwise regression analysis identified the number of physiotherapies and Barthel-Index at admission as the most important factors for changes in transfer from sitting to standing and transfer from bed to (wheel)chair, number of physiotherapies and time since stroke for climbing stairs, number of occupational therapies for eating/drinking, number of occupational therapies and time since stroke for dressing the upper part of the body and number of occupational therapies and length of inpatient rehab for object manipulation.

Conclusion In stroke patients, a higher number of therapies is associated with greater improvements of motor functions. Age, gender and type of stroke have no relevant impact on changes of motor functions during inpatient rehabilitation.

Schlüsselwörter

Schlaganfall - Rehabilitation - Prognosefaktoren - Assessments

Key words

stroke - rehabilitation - prognostic factors - assessments

Publication History

Article published online:
09 February 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Kwah LK, Harvey LA, Diong J. et al. Models containing age and NIHSS predict recovery of ambulation and upper limb function six months after stroke: an observational study. J Physiother 2013; 59: 189-197 DOI: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70183-8.
• 2 Ford GA, Bhakta BB, Cozens A. et al. Safety and efficacy of co-careldopa as an add-on therapy to occupational and physical therapy in patients after stroke (DARS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18: 530-538 DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30147-4.
• 3 Kong KH, Lee J. Temporal recovery and predictors of upper limb dexterity in the first year of stroke: a prospective study of patients admitted to a rehabilitation centre. NeuroRehabilitation 2013; 32: 345-350 DOI: 10.3233/NRE-130854.
• 4 Vieira A, Soares P, Nunes C. Predicting Independence 6 and 18 Months after Ischemic Stroke Considering Differences in 12 Countries: A Secondary Analysis of the IST-3 Trial. Stroke Res Treat 2021; 2021: 5627868 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5627868.. eCollection 2021
• 5 Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation. Empfehlungen zur Neurologischen Rehabilitation von Patienten mit schweren und schwersten Hirnschädigungen in den Phasen B und C https://www.bar-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/dateiliste/_publikationen/reha_vereinbarungen/pdfs/Empfehlung_neurologische_Reha_Phasen_B_und_C.pdf
• 6 Langhammer B, Sunnerhagen KS, Lundgren-Nilsson Å. et al. Factors enhancing activities of daily living after stroke in specialized rehabilitation: an observational multicenter study within the Sunnaas International Network. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 725-734 DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04489-6.
• 7 Hong I, Goodwin JS, Reistetter TA. et al. Comparison of Functional Status Improvements Among Patients With Stroke Receiving Postacute Care in Inpatient Rehabilitation vs Skilled Nursing Facilities. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2: e1916646 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16646.
• 8 Chae J, Johnston M, Kim H. et al. Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 218-223 DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199505000-00007.
• 9 Lin JH, Hsieh CL, Lo SK. et al. Prediction of functional outcomes in stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. J Formos Med Assoc 2003; 102: 695-700
• 10 Gialanella B, Santoro R, Ferlucci C. Predicting outcome after stroke: the role of basic activities of daily living predicting outcome after stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013; 49: 629-637
• 11 Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant. Int J Stroke 2013; 8: 25-32 DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00967.x.
• 12 Meyer MJ, Pereira S, McClure A. et al. A systematic review of studies reporting multivariable models to predict functional outcomes after post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2015; 37: 1316-1323 DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.963706.
• 13 Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation. The Barthel Index. Maryland state medical journal 1965; 14: 61-65
• 14 Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. et al. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 127-132
• 15 Inouye M, Kishi K, Ikeda Y. et al. Prediction of functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79: 513-518 DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200011000-00007.
• 16 Masiero S, Avesani R, Armani M. et al. Predictive factors for ambulation in stroke patients in the rehabilitation setting: a multivariate analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007; 109: 763-769 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.07.009.
• 17 Ng YS, Jung H, Tay SS. et al. Results from a prospective acute inpatient rehabilitation database: clinical characteristics and functional outcomes using the Functional Independence Measure. Ann Acad Med Singap 2007; 36: 3-10
• 18 Mutai H, Furukawa T, Araki K. et al. Factors associated with functional recovery and home discharge in stroke patients admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation ward. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2012; 12: 215-222 DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00747.x.
• 19 Vázquez-Guimaraens M, Caamaño-Ponte JL, Seoane-Pillado T. et al. Factors Related to Greater Functional Recovery after Suffering a Stroke. Brain Sci 2021; 11: 802 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11060802.
• 20 De Wit L, Putman K, Devos H. et al. Long-term prediction of functional outcome after stroke using single items of the Barthel Index at discharge from rehabilitation centre. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36: 353-358 DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.793411.
• 21 Stein J, Bettger JP, Sicklick A. et al. Use of a standardized assessment to predict rehabilitation care after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96: 210-217 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.403.
• 22 García-Rudolph A, Laxe S, Cegarra B. et al. Inpatient rehabilitation of working-age adults with ischemic stroke: comparing men and women clinical and functional characteristics at admission and predicting functionality. Rev Neurol 2022; 74: 69-77 DOI: 10.33588/rn.7403.2021297.
• 23 Knecht S, Roßmüller J, Unrath M. et al. Old benefit as much as young patients with stroke from high-intensity neurorehabilitation: cohort analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87: 526-530 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310344.
• 24 Starrost K, Greitemann G, Rickli B. et al. Motorische Funktionen in der postprimären Neurorehabilitation: Der Bereich Mobilität des Assessments der Kliniken Schmieder (AKS/C. physioscience 2011; 7: 99-111 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281630.
• 25 Basso DM, Lang CE. Consideration of Dose and Timing When Applying Interventions After Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 2017; 41 Suppl 3 IV STEP Spec Iss S24-S31 DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000165.
• 26 Platz T. S3-Leitlinie „Rehabilitative Therapie bei Armparese nach Schlaganfall“. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/080-001l_S3_Rehabilitative_Therapie_bei_Armparese_nach_Schlaganfall_2020-07.pdf
• 27 Clark B, Whitall J, Kwakkel G. et al. The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 10: CD012612 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012612.pub2.
• 28 Fukuda M, Kanda T, Kamide N. et al. Gender differences in long-term functional outcome after first-ever ischemic stroke. Intern Med 2009; 48: 967-973 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.1757.
• 29 Katrak PH, Black D, Peeva V. Do stroke patients with intracerebral hemorrhage have a better functional outcome than patients with cerebral infarction?. PM R 2009; 1: 427-433 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.03.002.
• 30 Hillmann S, Wiedmann S, Rücker V. et al. Stroke unit care in germany: the german stroke registers study group (ADSR). BMC Neurol 2017; 17: 49 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-017-0819-0.