Impact-Analysen eines familienintegrierenden Behandlungspfades Frühgeborener aus Sicht der Kostenträger

Zusammenfassung

Zielsetzung Mithilfe familienintegrierender Behandlungspfade konnte bereits mehrfach eine Reduktion der initialen Krankenhausverweildauer nachgewiesen werden. Wie sich dies auf die Ausgaben der Kostenträger auswirkt, blieb bisher unklar.

Methodik Um das Einsparungspotenzial durch eine Verkürzung der Verweildauer zu veranschaulichen, wurden eine grobe Hochrechnung und eine Budget-Impact-Analyse durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse Basierend auf den Ergebnissen eines Modellvorhabens konnte die durchschnittliche Verweildauerreduktion von einer Woche jährliche Kosteneinsparungen von rund 60 Millionen € bewirken.

Schlussfolgerung Selbst wenn weitere Einsparungspotenziale wie indirekte Kosteneinsparungen durch die Prävention psychischer Belastungen der Eltern nicht einkalkuliert werden, hat der Einbezug der Familien in die Versorgung Frühgeborener ein weitreichendes Potenzial für Kostenträger.

Abstract

Aim Family-integrated care has been shown to reduce the initial length of hospital stay on several occasions. The impact of this on provider expenditures has remained unclear.

Methods A simple extrapolation and budget impact analysis were conducted to illustrate the savings potential of the length-of-stay reduction.

Results Based on the results of a model project, the average reduction in length of stay by one week could lead to annual cost savings of around 60 Million €.

Conclusion Even if other potential savings, such as indirect cost savings from avoiding psychological distress for parents, are not considered, involving families in the care of preterm infants offers enormous potential for payers.

Schlüsselwörter

Budget-Impact-Analyse - familienintegrierende Versorgung - familienzentrierende Versorgung - Verweildauerreduktion - gesundheitsökonomische Auswirkungen

Key words

Budget impact analysis - family-integrating care - family-centered care - length of stay reduction - health economic impact

Publication History

Article published online:
09 May 2023

• Literatur

• 1 WHO. Preterm birth fact sheet (12.03.2021). Im Internet: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth; Stand: 15.03.2021
• 2 IQTIG. Bundesauswertung nach QSKH-RL 2019
• 3 Petrou S. Health economic aspects of late preterm and early term birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 24: 18-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2018.09.004.
• 4 Waitzman NJ, Jalali A, Grosse SD. Preterm birth lifetime costs in the United States in 2016: An update. SEMIN PERINATOL 2021; 151390 DOI: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151390.
• 5 van Baaren GJ, Peelen MJCS, Schuit E. et al. Preterm birth in singleton and multiple pregnancies: evaluation of costs and perinatal outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 186: 34-41 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.12.024.
• 6 Petrou S, Yiu HH, Kwon J. Economic consequences of preterm birth: a systematic review of the recent literature (2009-2017). Arch Dis Child 2019; 104: 456-465 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315778.
• 7 Rüdiger M, Heinrich L, Arnold K. et al. Impact of birthweight on health-care utilization during early childhood – a birth cohort study. BMC Pediatr 2019; 19: 69 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1424-8.
• 8 Yu X, Zhang J. Family-centred care for hospitalized preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE 2018; 25: e12705 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12705.
• 9 Ding X, Zhu L, Zhang R. et al. Effects of family-centred care interventions on preterm infants and parents in neonatal intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Aust Crit Care 2019; 32: 63-75 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.10.007.
• 10 Mayer-Huber S, Paulick J, Pricoco R. Outcome-Messung familienintegrierender Versorgungsmodelle für Frühgeborene: Ein Scoping-Review. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement 2022; 27: 36-45 DOI: 10.1055/a-1652-8976.
• 11 Melnyk BM, Feinstein NF, Alpert-Gillis L. et al. Reducing premature infants’ length of stay and improving parents’ mental health outcomes with the Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment (COPE) neonatal intensive care unit program: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2006; 118: e1414-e1427 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-2580.
• 12 Keller M. NeoPAss, a systematic approach for implementation of family integrated care in the NICU (23.12.2022). Im Internet: https://www.medela.com/dam/medela-com/breastfeeding-professional/documents/general/symposium2015-16/abstracts-pdf/Abstracts-2016/Abstract_Matthias-Keller_Berlin-2016_EN.pdf/abstract-matthias-keller-berlin-2016-en.pdf?uuid=jcr:9110c443-9ee2-472c-91bd-eb82e16004a0; Stand: 23.12.2022
• 13 Keller M, Felderhoff-Mueser U, Lagercrantz H. et al. Policy benchmarking report on neonatal health and social policies in 13 European countries. Acta Paediatr 2010; 99: 1624-1629 DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01894.x.
• 14 Ghabri S, Mauskopf J. The use of budget impact analysis in the economic evaluation of new medicines in Australia, England, France and the United States: relationship to cost-effectiveness analysis and methodological challenges 2018; 19 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0933-3.
• 15 Greiner W, Witte J. Grundkonzepte und Einsatz von Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertungen im internationalen Überblick. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2022; 174: 111-118 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.08.001.
• 16 Eisenreich S, Bierbaum M, Sohn S, Schöffski O. 8 Budget Impact Analysen. In: Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer; 2012: 181-193
• 17 Orlewska E, Mierzejewski P. Proposal of Polish guidelines for conducting financial analysis and their comparison to existing guidance on budget impact in other countries. Value in Health 2004; 7: 1-10 DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.71257.x.
• 18 Trueman P, Drummond M, Hutton J. Developing guidance for budget impact analysis 2001; 19: 609-621 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119060-00001.
• 19 Mayer-Huber S. Sekundärdatennutzung mittels Coarsened Exact Matching zur Generierung einer Kontrollgruppe im Forschungskontext der familienintegrierenden Versorgung Frühgeborener. Potsdam 2022; DOI: 10.3205/22dkvf428.
• 20 Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Stat Sci 2010; 25: 1-21 DOI: 10.1214/09-STS313.
• 21 Zeller M, Blöchl E. Bestens begleitet mit NeoPAss. JuKiP-Ihr Fachmagazin für Gesundheits-und Kinderkrankenpflege 2016; 5: 120-124 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104972.
• 22 Thomas T, Richter D, Schill S, Heller PG. Qualität der Versorgung sehr kleiner Frühgeborener (17.10.2022). Im Internet: https://iqtig.org/downloads/berichte/2018/IQTIG_Qualitaetsreport-2019_2019-09-25.pdf; Stand: 17.10.2022
• 23 Banerjee J, Aloysius A, Mitchell K. et al. Improving infant outcomes through implementation of a family integrated care bundle including a parent supporting mobile application. ADC Fetal & Neonatal 2020; 105: 172-177 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316435.
• 24 Nuijten MJC, Rutten F. Combining a budgetary-impact analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis using decision-analytic modelling techniques. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20: 855-867 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220120-00006.
• 25 van Veenendaal NR, van Kempen AA, Broekman BFP. et al. Association of a Zero-Separation Neonatal Care Model With Stress in Mothers of Preterm Infants. JAMA network open 2022; 5: e224514-e224514 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4514.
• 26 Jannes C, Miedaner F, Langhammer K. et al. Increased parental satisfaction by unrestricted visiting hours and developmentally supportive care in NICUs – results of a German multicenter study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33: 1874-1880 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1532499.
• 27 Axelin A, Feeley N, Campbell-Yeo M. et al. Symptoms of depression in parents after discharge from NICU associated with family-centred care. J Adv Nurs 2022; 78: 1676-1687 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15128.
• 28 Sullivan SD, Mauskopf JA, Augustovski F. et al. Budget impact analysis—principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force. Value in Health 2014; 17: 5-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291.
• 29 Bastani F, Abadi TA, Haghani H. Effect of Family-centered Care on Improving Parental Satisfaction and Reducing Readmission among Premature Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research 2015; 9: SC04-SC08 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/10356.5444.
• 30 Hei M, Gao X, Li Y. et al. Family Integrated Care for Preterm Infants in China: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr 2021; 228: 36-43.e2 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.09.006.
• 31 Lv B, Gao X-R, Sun J. et al. Family-Centered Care Improves Clinical Outcomes of Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Front Pediatr 2019; 7: 138 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00138.
• 32 Zhang R, Huang R-W, Gao X-R. et al. Involvement of Parents in the Care of Preterm Infants: A Pilot Study Evaluating a Family-Centered Care Intervention in a Chinese Neonatal ICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2018; 19: 741-747 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001586.