J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39(07): 540-548
DOI: 10.1055/a-2003-8885
Original Article

The Preferred Reconstructive Choice for a Lower Third Tibial Exposure Defect: An Online Survey of 356 Microsurgeons

1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive, Helios Clinic Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Mohamed AbdelRahman
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
3   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
4   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, James Cook University Hospitals NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
,
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Che-Hsiung Lee
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Angela Ting-Wei Hsu
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
5   Department of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
,
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Tommy Nai-Jen Chang
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
› Author Affiliations

Funding None.

Abstract

Background One of the most challenging yet common areas in reconstructive surgery is the closure of defects in the lower leg. Surgeons can choose from several reconstructive options including local and free flaps. The aim of this study was to understand the reconstructive strategy for lower leg defects of different microsurgeons around the world by harnessing the power of social media and online questionnaires.

Methods A case of a patient with an exposed plate over distal tibial fracture was presented via an online questionnaire distributed on various social media platforms. A total of 369 international microsurgeons replied with their preferred treatment choice. The data were analyzed according to geographic area, microsurgical training, seniority, and subspecialty.

Results Among all the respondents (n = 369), 64% would have opted for a free flap reconstruction, while the remaining 36% would have opted for a local/pedicle flap. In the group that would have opted for a free flap, 63% would reconstruct the defect using a free fasciocutaneous flap, while the remaining 37% would have used a free muscle flap. In the local flap group, 60% would have used a local perforator while 30% would have chosen a conventional local flap. While North American and European microsurgeons had a clear preference toward free flaps, Asian, Middle Eastern, African, and South American surgeons were evenly divided between local and free flaps.

Conclusion In this study, we provide a current global overview of the reconstructive strategies for a lower limb with skin defect and bone or prosthesis exposure. We hope that this will be able to help global microsurgeons and patients worldwide.



Publication History

Received: 19 June 2022

Accepted: 30 November 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 December 2022

Article published online:
31 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Wei F-C, Mardini S. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. 1st ed.. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Inc.; 2009
  • 2 Hong JP. 5 - Reconstructive Surgery: Lower Extremity Coverage. 3rd ed.. Elsevier Inc.; 2013
  • 3 Kwon SH, Lee CH, Hsu ATW. et al. Use of social media and an online survey to discuss complex reconstructive surgery: a case of upper lip reconstruction with 402 responses from international microsurgeons. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (06) 413-419
  • 4 Santamaría E, Nahás-Combina L, Altamirano-Arcos C, Vargas-Flores E. Master series microsurgery for residents: results from a comprehensive survey of a multitudinous online course during COVID-19 pandemic. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (07) 602-607
  • 5 Sung CWH, Huang JJ, Mao SH. et al. International Microsurgery Club Webinar Series-bridging the knowledge gap during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (04) 296-305
  • 6 Pittenger AL. The use of social networking to improve the quality of interprofessional education. Am J Pharm Educ 2013; 77 (08) 174
  • 7 Tang ETH, Goh M, Goh R. et al. International microsurgery club: an effective online collaboration system. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (06) 412-419
  • 8 Koepple C, Kallenberger A-K, Pollmann L. et al. Comparison of fasciocutaneous and muscle-based free flaps for soft tissue reconstruction of the upper extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (12) e2543
  • 9 Cho EH, Shammas RL, Carney MJ. et al. Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity traumatic reconstruction: a multicenter outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 191-199
  • 10 Salgado CJ, Mardini S, Jamali AA, Ortiz J, Gonzales R, Chen HC. Muscle versus nonmuscle flaps in the reconstruction of chronic osteomyelitis defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (06) 1401-1411
  • 11 Guzman-Stein G, Fix RJ, Vasconez LO. Muscle flap coverage for the lower extremity. Clin Plast Surg 1991; 18 (03) 545-552
  • 12 Yazar S, Lin C-H, Lin Y-T, Ulusal AE, Wei F-C. Outcome comparison between free muscle and free fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction of distal third and ankle traumatic open tibial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2468-2475 , discussion 2476–2477
  • 13 Demirtas Y, Kelahmetoglu O, Cifci M, Tayfur V, Demir A, Guneren E. Comparison of free anterolateral thigh flaps and free muscle-musculocutaneous flaps in soft tissue reconstruction of lower extremity. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (01) 24-31
  • 14 Pontén B. The fasciocutaneous flap: its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg 1981; 34 (02) 215-220
  • 15 Rodriguez ED, Bluebond-Langner R, Copeland C, Grim TN, Singh NK, Scalea T. Functional outcomes of posttraumatic lower limb salvage: a pilot study of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps versus muscle flaps. J Trauma 2009; 66 (05) 1311-1314
  • 16 Wong CH, Ong YS, Wei FC. The anterolateral thigh - vastus lateralis conjoint flap for complex defects of the lower limb. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (02) 235-239
  • 17 Lu TC, Lin CH, Lin CH, Lin YT, Chen RF, Wei FC. Versatility of the pedicled peroneal artery perforator flaps for soft-tissue coverage of the lower leg and foot defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (03) 386-393
  • 18 Tos P, Innocenti M, Artiaco S. et al. Perforator-based propeller flaps treating loss of substance in the lower limb. J Orthop Traumatol 2011; 12 (02) 93-99
  • 19 Ducic I, Attinger CE. Foot and ankle reconstruction: pedicled muscle flaps versus free flaps and the role of diabetes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (01) 173-180
  • 20 Abdelrahman I, Moghazy A, Abbas A. et al. A prospective randomized cost billing comparison of local fasciocutaneous perforator versus free Gracilis flap reconstruction for lower limb in a developing economy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (08) 1121-1127
  • 21 Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Fukuzumi S, Minabe T, Aiso S, Fujino T. Accompanying arteries of the cutaneous veins and cutaneous nerves in the extremities: anatomical study and a concept of the venoadipofascial and/or neuroadipofascial pedicled fasciocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 779-791
  • 22 Nakajima H, Minabe T, Imanishi N. Three-dimensional analysis and classification of arteries in the skin and subcutaneous adipofascial tissue by computer graphics imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 748-760
  • 23 Nakajima H, Fujino T, Adachi S. A new concept of vascular supply to the skin and classification of skin flaps according to their vascularization. Ann Plast Surg 1986; 16 (01) 1-19
  • 24 Hallock GG. Direct and indirect perforator flaps: the history and the controversy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (02) 855-865 , quiz 866
  • 25 Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42 (06) 645-648
  • 26 Hyakusoku H, Yamamoto T, Fumiiri M. The propeller flap method. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44 (01) 53-54