Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2023; 39(02): 201-209
DOI: 10.1055/a-1952-8569
Original Research

Rhytidectomy—Information Patients Seek and Where They Find Answers

Christian Fritz 
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Emma De Ravin
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
2   Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Neeraj Suresh
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Anne S. Lowery
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Karthik Rajasekaran
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
3   Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Patients considering rhytidectomy often search for information online prior to in-office consultation. This study identifies the most searched queries regarding rhytidectomy and evaluates sources to which patients are directed. The search engine optimization tool Ahrefs was utilized to extract Google metadata on searches performed in the United States. Frequently asked questions were categorized by topic; websites were categorized by type. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria enabled information quality assessment. A total of 565 questions for three search phrases were extracted (265 “facelift,” 265 “face lift,” and 35 “rhytidectomy”). The majority of monthly searches in the facelift and face lift groups pertained to procedural cost, which was significantly higher than in the rhytidectomy group (52.9% and 50.7 vs. 0.0%, ANOVA p <0.001). The mean JAMA score for private practice sources (1.2 ± 0.42) was significantly lower than that of academic pages of (2.3 ± 1.9, p = 0.026) and commercial sources (3.0 ± 0.82, p = 0.008). The most popular destinations for rhytidectomy were California and Mexico (630 and 440 searches/month). Online searches for facelifts often revolve around the topic of cost and frequently direct patients to websites that provide inadequate information on authorship, attribution, disclosure, and currency.

Keywords

rhytidectomy - facelift - search analytics - online health information

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
29 September 2022

Article published online:
30 November 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Yang AJ, Hohman MH. Rhytidectomy. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Jan. Accessed March 18, 2022. at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564338/
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Reid P, Borycki EM. Emergence of a new consumer health informatics framework: introducing the healthcare organization. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 164: 353-357
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fassas SN, Krane NA, Zonner JG, Sykes KJ, Kriet JD, Humphrey CD. Google Search analysis: what do people want to know about rhinoplasty and where do they find the answers?. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022; 24 (05) 363-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fassas SN, Peterson AM, Farrokhian N. et al. Sinus surgery and balloon sinuplasty: what do patients want to know?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 167 (04) 777-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ballestas SA, Soriano RM, Sethna AB. Readability assessment of online rhytidectomy patient information. Plast Surg Nurs 2020; 40 (03) 145-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Awal DH, Mills C. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 56 (02) 124-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shen TS, Driscoll DA, Islam W, Bovonratwet P, Haas SB, Su EP. Modern Internet search analytics and total joint arthroplasty: what are patients asking and reading online?. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (04) 1224-1231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rothwell D. Mixed Company: Communicating in Small Groups. 8th ed.. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Kanthawala S, Vermeesch A, Given B, Huh J. Answers to health questions: internet search results versus online health community responses. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (04) e95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F. The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer. Oral Oncol 2009; 45 (09) e95-e98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bojrab II DI, Fritz C, Babu S, Lin KF. A critical analysis of the information available online for Ménière's disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 162 (03) 329-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997; 277 (15) 1244-1245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fan KS, Ghani SA, Machairas N. et al. COVID-19 prevention and treatment information on the internet: a systematic analysis and quality assessment. BMJ Open 2020; 10 (09) e040487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Arslan D, Tutar MS, Kozanhan B. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children. Eur J Pediatr 2020; 179 (12) 1881-1891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wu V, Lee DJ, Vescan A, Lee JM. Evaluating YouTube as a source of patient information for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Ear Nose Throat J 2022; 101 (06) 396-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fritz CG, Dwyer SM, Renker JM. et al. Patient sentiments influencing management strategy for single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43 (04) e399-e407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wu C, Scott Hultman C, Diegidio P. et al. What do our patients truly want? conjoint analysis of an aesthetic plastic surgery practice using internet crowdsourcing. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (01) 105-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2022. Facelift cost. Accessed 29 May 2022, available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/cosmetic-procedures/facelift/cost
    PubMedGoogle Scholar