Endoscopy 2020; 52(05): 377-382
DOI: 10.1055/a-1139-0772
Innovations and brief communication

Endoscopic negative pressure therapy with open-pore film drainage and open-pore polyurethane sponge drainage for iatrogenic perforation of the esophagus

Dörte Wichmann
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Dietmar Stüker
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Ulrike Schempf
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Christoph R. Werner
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Volker Steger
3   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Alfred Königsrainer
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Ulrich Schweizer
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Rami Archid
1   Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Management of iatrogenic esophageal perforation (IEP) is challenging. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) is an emerging and effective tool for the treatment of gastrointestinal and anastomotic leaks. We have used ENPT as first-line therapy for IEP since 2017. The aim of this study was to present our results with this strategy in patients with IEP.

Methods Nine patients were treated with ENPT for IEP between August 2017 and August 2019. Their treatment characteristics, including duration of therapy, strategy used, and outcomes, were analyzed. Treatment included ENPT with open-pore film drainage (OFD) and open-pore polyurethane foam drainage (OPD).

Results Early diagnosis (< 24 hours) of IEP occurred in four patients. After a mean (standard deviation) of 19.0 (13.5) days of ENPT, 6.4 (3.4) endoscopies, and 38.1 (40.3) days of hospitalization, endoscopic treatment was effective and successful in all of the patients. Additional video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was done in four patients.

Conclusions ENPT is an effective new method for the management of IEP. ENPT with OFD and OPD can be combined with minimally invasive operative methods for sepsis control in IEP.



Publication History

Received: 25 September 2019

Accepted: 27 February 2020

Article published online:
06 April 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • References

  • 1 Bisschops R, Areia M, Coron E. et al. Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 843-864
  • 2 Sdralis EIK, Petousis S, Rashid F. et al. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of esophageal perforations: systematic review. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30: 1-6
  • 3 Raithel M, Albrecht H, Scheppach W. et al. Outcome, comorbidity, hospitalization and 30-day mortality after closure of acute perforations and postoperative anastomotic leaks by the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) in an unselected cohort of patients. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 2411-2425
  • 4 Loske G, Schorsch T, Schulze W. et al. Iatrogenic esophageal perforation during fundoplication: treatment with endoscopic negative pressure therapy. Endoscopy 2019; 51: E267-E268
  • 5 Loske G, Schorsch T, Dahm C. et al. Iatrogenic perforation of esophagus successfully treated with endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT). Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E547-E551
  • 6 Holmer C, Mallmann CA, Musch MA. et al. Surgical management of iatrogenic perforation of the gastrointestinal tract: 15 years of experience in a single center. World J Surg 2017; 41: 1961-1965
  • 7 Schmidt A, Fuchs KH, Caca K. et al. The endoscopic treatment of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016; 113: 121-128
  • 8 Rausa E, Asti E, Aiolfi A. et al. Comparison of endoscopic vacuum therapy versus endoscopic stenting for esophageal leaks: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2018; DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy060.
  • 9 Kuehn F, Loske G, Schiffmann L. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for various defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 3449-3458
  • 10 Laukoetter MG, Mennigen R, Neumann PA. et al. Successful closure of defects in the upper gastrointestinal tract by endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT): a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 2687-2696
  • 11 Loske G. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Chirurg 2019; 90 (Suppl. 01) 1-6
  • 12 Loske G, Schorsch T, Rucktaeschel F. et al. Open-pore film drainage (OFD): a new multipurpose tool for endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT). Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E865-E871
  • 13 Schorsch T, Muller C, Loske G. [Endoscopic vacuum therapy of perforations and anastomotic insufficiency of the esophagus]. Chirurg 2014; 85: 1081-1093
  • 14 Kuehn F, Schiffmann L, Janisch F. et al. Surgical endoscopic vacuum therapy for defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20: 237-243
  • 15 Loske G, Muller CT. Tips and tricks for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. Chirurg 2019; 90 (Suppl. 01) 7-14