Evaluating the Impact of Hybrid Electronic-paper Environments Upon Novice Nurse Information Seeking

Summary

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of hybrid environments (i.e. where part of the patient record is paper-based and part of it is electronic) upon aspects of novice nurse information seeking (i.e. amount of information accessed, choice of key information sources, type of information and use of information seeking tactics).

Methods: A within group, laboratory, experimental study was conducted using two simulated environments (i.e. a paper environment and a hybrid environment). Thirty-five novice nurses participated in the study.

Results: Findings revealed significant differences between the paper and hybrid environments in terms of their effects upon aspects of novice nurse information seeking. Subjects accessed: 1) less information in the hybrid environment than the paper environment, 2) more non-electronic sources of information were accessed by novice nurses in the hybrid environment, and 3) novice nurses used more passive information seeking tactics in the hybrid environment than the paper environment. Qualitative findings from the cued recall data revealed subjects experienced increased cognitive load in the hybrid environment.

Conclusions: Hybrid environments may affect aspects of novice nurse information seeking. Future research should explore the effects of hybrid environments upon the information seeking of other types of health professionals (e.g. physicians, physiotherapists) with differing levels of expertise (i.e. novice, intermediate and expert).

Keywords

EPR - CPR - EMR - EHR - human factors - hybrid - electronic-paper - environment - novice - nurse - health professional - information seeking - information needs

• References

• 1 Currie LM, Graham M, Allen M, Bakken S, Patel V, Cimino JJ. Clinical information needs in context: An observational study of clinicians while using a clinical information system. AMIA 2003 Annu Symp Proc 2003
• 2 Johnson JD. Information seeking: An organizational dilemma. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum; 1996
• 3 Miller VD, Jablin FM. Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics and a model of process. Acad Manage Rev 1991; 16: 92-120.
• 4 Protti D. Comparison of information technology in general practice in 10 countries. Healthcare Quart 2007; 10 (02) 107-116.
• 5 Lorence DP, Spink A, Richards MC. EPR adoption and dual record maintenance in the U. S.: Assessing variation in medical systems infrastructure. J Med Syst 2002; 26 (05) 357-367.
• 6 Rabinowitz E. Is there a doctor in the house?. Manag Care 1999; 8 (09) 42-44.
• 7 Hersh WR, Stavri PZ, Detmer WM. Information retrieval and digital libraries. In: Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ. editors. Biomedical informatics: Computer applications in health care and biomedicine (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Verlag; 2006. pp 660-697.
• 8 Ash J, Gorman P, Lavelle M, Lyman J, Fournier L. Investigating physician order entry in the field: Lessons learned in a multi-centre study. Proc MedInfo 2001
• 9 March JG, Simon HA. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1958
• 10 Jablin FM. Organizational entry, assimilation, and disengagement/exit. In: Jablin FM, Putnam LL. editors. The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research and methods. London: Sage; 2001. pp 732-818.
• 11 McKnight M, Peet M. Health care providers’ information seeking: Recent research. Med Serv Quart 2000; 19 (02) 27-50.
• 12 Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: Are they being met?. Ann Internal Med 1985; 103 (04) 596-599.
• 13 Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ. Biomedical informatics: Computer applications in health care and biomedicine. New York: Springer Verlag; 2006
• 14 Cioffi J, Markham R. Clinical decision making by midwives: Managing case complexity. J Adv Nurs 1997; 23: 265-272.
• 15 Branham.. eHealth in Canada: Crossing the chasm. Ottawa: Branham Group; 2007
• 16 Pizzi R. Hybrid medical records an option for some hospitals. (Electronic Version). Healthcare IT News; (June 29, 2007).
• 17 Sellen AJ, Harper HR. The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2003
• 18 Kushniruk AW, Kaufmann D, Patel VL, Levesque Y, Lottin P. Assessment of a computerized patient record system: A cognitive approach to evaluating medical technology. MD Comp 1996; 13 (05) 406-412.
• 19 Patel VL, Kushniruk AW, Yang S, Yale J-F. Impact of a computer-based patient record system on data collection, knowledge organization, and reasoning. JAMIA 2000; 7 (06) 569-585.
• 20 Keppel G. Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1982
• 21 Sanli M. Mount Sinai Hospital develops “Sinai e-learning”: Making it simpler for busy clinical staff to master healthcare applications (Electronic version). Healthcare Quart 2005; 3: 1-4.
• 22 Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1993
• 23 Hanser LM, Muchinsky PM. Work as an information environment. Org Behav 1978; 21: 47-60.
• 24 Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health 2000; 23: 246-255.
• 25 Hunt EC, Sproat SB, Kitzmiller RR. The nursing informatics implementation guide. New York: Springer Verlag; 2004
• 26 Estabrookes CA, Chong H, Brigidear K, Profetto-McGrath J. Profiling Canadian nurses’ preferred knowledge sources for clinical practice. Can J Nurs Res 2005; 37 (02) 118-140.
• 27 Estabrookes CA, Rutakumwa W, O’Leary KA, Profetto-McGrath J, Milner M, Levers MJ, Scott-Find-lay S. Sources of practice knowledge among nurses. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 (04) 460-473.
• 28 Patel VL, Groen GJ. The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look. In: Ericsson KA, Smith J. (eds.). Toward a general theory of expertise prospects and limits. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991. pp 93-123.
• 29 Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Osheroff JA, Miller RA. Expanding the concept of medical information: An observational study of physicians’ information needs. Comp Biomed Res 1992; 25: 181-200.
• 30 Forsythe DE. Using ethnography to investigate life scientists’ information systems. Bull Med Lib Assoc 1998; 86 (03) 408-409.
• 31 Lammond D, Crow R, Chase J, Doggen K, Sinkels M. Information sources used in decision making: Considerations for simulation development. Int J Nurs Stud 1996; 33 (01) 47-57.
• 32 Hunt EC, Sproat SB, Kitzmiller RR. The nursing informatics implementation guide. New York: Springer Verlag; 2004
• 33 Kushniruk AW, Borycki EM. Low-cost rapid usability engineering: Designing and customizing usable healthcare information systems. Healthcare Quart 2006; 9 (04) 98-100 102.
• 34 Johnson CM, Turley JP. The significance of cognitive modeling in building healthcare interfaces. Inter J Med Inf 2006; 75: 163-172.
• 35 Elio R, Scharf PB. Modeling novice-to-expert shifts in problem solving strategy and knowledge organization. Cog Sci 1990; 14: 579-639.
• 36 Fonteyn ME, Kuipers B, Grobe SJ. Expert nurses’ clinical reasoning under uncertainty: Representation, structure and process. Proc AMIA Washington, D. C: AMIA; 1992
• 37 Buchan J. Global nursing shortages. BMJ 2002; 324: 751-752.
• 38 Aiken LH, Buchan J, Sochalski J, Nichols B, Powell M. Trends in international nurse migration. Health Affairs 2004; 23 (03) 69-77.