Thromb Haemost 2009; 102(05): 846-853
DOI: 10.1160/TH09-01-0064
Theme Issue Article
Schattauer GmbH

Heparins: Process-related physico-chemical and compositional characteristics, fingerprints and impurities

Lino Liverani
1   R&D Laboratories, Opocrin SpA, Corlo di Formigine, Modena, Italy
,
Giuseppe Mascellani
2   Freelance, Expert of Group 6 of European Pharmacopoeia, Bologna, Italy
,
Franco Spelta
1   R&D Laboratories, Opocrin SpA, Corlo di Formigine, Modena, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 27 January 2009

Accepted after major revision: 02 July 2009

Publication Date:
27 November 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

During the past 25 years, heparin extraction and purification processes have changed. The results of these changes are reflected by the continuous increase in potency of the International Standard for heparin. This increase is due not only to a higher purity, but also to a number of changes in the physicochemical characteristics of heparin. For long time, all these changes have been disregarded as non-critical by regulatory authorities. Heparin marketing authorisation was reviewed only two years ago and Pharmacopoeia monographs were reviewed just for the addition of new tests, mainly aimed at tackling the oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) crisis. Currently, heparin monographs are again under revision. Such changes, different for each manufacturer, have caused a further increase in the heterogeneity of individual batches of heparin. This review aims at showing that chemical, physical and biological characteristics of heparin (such as disaccharide composition, amount of low sulfated and high sulfated sequences, molecular weight profiles [MW], activities, structural artifacts, fingerprints and glycosaminoglycans impurities) are all process-dependent and may significantly vary when different processes are used to minimise the content of dermatan sulfate. The wide heterogeneity of the physico-chemical characteristics of currently marketed heparin and the lack of suitable and shareable reference standards for the identification/quantification of process-related impurities caused, and are still causing, heated debates among scientific institutions, companies and authorities.