Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027391
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Hemiplegische Schulter - Evidenz von Behandlungsmöglichkeiten bei Schulterschmerz[1]
Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain - Evidence of Different Treatment ModalitiesPublication History
eingereicht: 23.4.2007
angenommen: 27.7.2007
Publication Date:
13 May 2008 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Das Auftreten von Schulterschmerz nach erlittenem Schlaganfall ist eine häufige Komplikation, die die motorische Erholung, Aktivität und die Lebensqualität der Betroffenen beeinträchtigt.
Ziel: Die Arbeit untersuchte die Frage nach der Evidenz physiotherapeutischer Maßnahmen zur Prävention und Behandlung von Schulterschmerz in der Schlaganfallrehabilitation.
Methode: Die Literatursuche in den medizinischen Datenbanken Medline, Cochrane und PEDro erzielte 1 Metaanalyse, 6 Reviews, 8 RCT und 1 CT.
Ergebnisse: Nur 1 von 7 Methoden zur Schmerzbewertung wies bei Schlaganfallpatienten die nötige Reliabilität und Validität auf. Studien zu funktioneller Elektrostimulation und transkutaner elektrischer Nervenstimulation ergaben widersprüchliche Ergebnisse bezüglich der Schmerzbehandlung im Gegensatz evidenzbasierten Effekten bei intramuskulärer Elektrostimulation. Einzelne Tapetechniken erzielten eine erfolgreiche Prävention von Schulterschmerz. Apparatives Durchbewegen zeigte eine Tendenz zur Schmerzreduktion, Dehnungslagerung erzielte keine Schmerzlinderung. Zu weiteren Behandlungsansätzen kann bisher keine evidenzbasierte Aussage getroffen werden.
Schlussfolgerungen: Elektrotherapie, Tapen der Schulter und endgradiges passives Bewegen scheinen wirkungsvolle Präventions- und Behandlungsmöglichkeiten von Schulterschmerz zu sein. Zu Bestätigung dieser Aussage sind weitere, qualitativ hochwertige Studien und Untersuchungen notwendig, die die Reliabilität und Validität von Messmethoden für Schmerz an Schlaganfallpatienten nachweisen.
Abstract
Background: Hemiplegic shoulder pain is a common post-stroke complication that reduces motor recovery, activity and quality of life of the person concerned.
Objective: This article investigated the question of the evidence of physiotherapeutic measures focussed on prevention and treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain in stroke rehabilitation.
Methods: The literature search in the medical databases Medline, Cochrane and PEDro achieved 1 meta-analysis, 6 reviews, 8 RCT and 1 CT.
Results: Only 1 of the 7 methods applied to stroke patients in order to evaluate pain offered the required reliability and validity. Trials of functional electrical stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation showed contradictory results concerning pain treatment whereas intramuscular electrical stimulation gained evidence-based results. Specific taping techniques achieved successful prevention of hemiplegic shoulder pain. Continuous technical passive motion tended towards pain relief, static positional did not alleviate pain. An evidence-based statement concerning further treatment approaches is so far not possible.
Conclusions: Electrical stimulation, shoulder taping and end-range passive motion seem to be effective treatment modalities for hemiplegic shoulder pain. To verify this, high-quality clinical trials and studies are necessary to prove reliability and validity of measurements for hemiplegic shoulder pain in stroke patients.
Schlüsselwörter
Physiotherapie - Schlaganfallrehabilitation - Schulterschmerz - Prävention - Behandlung
Key words
physiotherapy - stroke rehabilitation - hemiplegic shoulder pain - prevention - treatment
1 Die Arbeit wurde im Rahmen des gemeinsamen Bachelor-Studiengangs für Physiotherapie der FH Fulda und der Universität Marburg verfasst.
Literatur
- 1
Ada L, Foongchomcheay A.
Efficacy of electrical stimulation in preventing or reducing subluxation of the shoulder
after stroke: A meta-analysis.
Aust J Physiother.
2002;
48
257-267
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Ada L, Foongchomcheay A, Canning C.
Supportive devices for preventing and treating subluxation of the shoulder after stroke.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2005;
25
CD003863
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Aras M D, Gokkaya N K, Comert D. et al .
Shoulder pain in hemiplegia: results from a national rehabilitation hospital in Turkey.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
2004;
83
713-719
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Bayona N A, Bitensky J, Foley N. et al .
Intrinsic factors influencing post stroke brain reorganization.
Top Stroke Rehabil.
2005;
12
27-36
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Chae J, Yu D T, Walker M E. et al .
Intramuscular electrical stimulation for hemiplegic shoulder pain: a 12-month follow-up
of a multiple-center, randomized clinical trial.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
2005;
84
832-842
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Chantraine A, Baribeault A, Uebelhart D. et al .
Shoulder pain and dysfunction in hemiplegia: effects of functional electrical stimulation.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
1999;
80
328-331
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Dobkin B H.
Rehabilitation after stroke. Clinical Practice.
N Engl J Med.
2005;
352
1677-1684
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Griffin A, Bernhardt J.
Strapping the hemiplegic shoulder prevents development of pain during rehabilitation:
a randomized controlled trial.
Clin Rehabil.
2006;
20
287-295
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Gustafsson L, McKenna K.
A programme of static positional stretches does not reduce hemiplegic shoulder pain
or maintain shoulder range of motion - a randomized controlled trial.
Clin Rehabil.
2006;
20
277-286
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Hanger H C, Whitewood P, Brown G. et al .
A randomized controlled trial of strapping to prevent post-stroke shoulder pain.
Clin Rehabil.
2000;
14
370-380
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Ikai T, Tei K, Yoshida K. et al .
Evaluation and treatment of shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia: relationship between
subluxation and pain.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
1998;
77
421-426
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Kobayashi H, Onishi H, Ihashi K. et al .
Reduction in subluxation and improved muscle function of the hemiplegic shoulder joint
after therapeutic electrical stimulation.
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology.
1999;
9
327-336
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Kwakkel G, Peppen van R, Wagenaar R C. et al .
Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time after Stroke. A Meta-Analysis.
Stroke.
2004;
35
2529-2536
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Linn S L, Granat M H, Lees K R.
Prevention of Shoulder Subluxation after Stroke with Electrical Stiumulation.
Stroke.
1999;
30
963-968
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Lo S F, Chen S Y, Lin H C. et al .
Arthrographic and clinical findings in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2003;
84
1786-1791
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Lynch D, Ferraro M, Krol J. et al .
Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke.
Clin Rehabil.
2005;
19
594-599
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Maher C G, Sherrington C, Herbert R D. et al .
Reliability of the PEDro Scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials.
Pys Ther.
2003;
83
713-721
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Paci M, Nanneti L, Rinaldi L A.
Glenohumeral subluxation in hemiplegia An overview.
JRRD.
2005;
42
557-568
MissingFormLabel
- 19 Physiotherapy Evidence Database .PEDro scale. Last modified March 1999. www.pedro.fhs.usyd.edu.au/scale_item.html (25.11.2006)
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Platz T, Pinkowski C, Wijck van F. et al .
Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for
the Fugl-Meyer-Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre
study.
Clin Rehabil.
2005;
19
404-411
MissingFormLabel
- 21 Poeck K, Hacke W. Neurologie. Berlin; Springer 2001 11. Aufl
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Price C IM, Curless R H, Rodgers H.
Can Stroke Patients Use Visual Analogue Scales?.
Stroke.
1999;
30
1357-1361
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Price C IM, Pandyan A D.
Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2000;
4
No. CD001698. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001698
MissingFormLabel
- 24 Schädler S, Kool J, Lüthi H. et al .Assessments in der Neurorehabilitation. www.igptr.ch/ass_igpnr/Neuroassessment.htm (02.11.2006)
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Snels I A, Beckerman H, Twisk J W. et al .
Effect of triamcinolone acetonide injections on hemiplegic shoulder pain: A randomized
clinical trial.
Stroke.
2000;
31
2396-2401
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Snels I A, Dekker J H, Lee J H. et al .
Treating patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
2002;
81
150-160
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Sonde van der L, Gip C, Fernaeus S E. et al .
Stimulation with low frequency (1,7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation
(low-tens) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm.
Scand J Rehabil Med.
1998;
30
95-99
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Sonde L, Kalimo H, Fernaeus S E. et al .
Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: a three-year follow-up.
Clin Rehabil.
2000;
14
14-19
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Stein J.
Motor recovery strategies after stroke.
Top Stroke Rehabil.
2004;
11
12-22
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Teasell R, Bitensky J, Salter K. et al .
The role of timing and intensity of rehabilitation therapies.
Top Stroke Rehabil.
2005;
12
46-57
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Turner-Stokes L, Jackson D.
Shoulder pain after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development
of an integrated care pathway.
Clin Rehabil.
2002;
16
276-298
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Walsh K.
Management of shoulder pain in patients with stroke.
Postgrad Med J.
2001;
77
645-649
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Williams B K, Galea M P, Winter A T.
What is the functional outcome for the upper limb after stroke?.
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy.
2001;
47
19-27
MissingFormLabel
1 Die Arbeit wurde im Rahmen des gemeinsamen Bachelor-Studiengangs für Physiotherapie der FH Fulda und der Universität Marburg verfasst.
Eva-Maria Brückel
PT, B.Sc.
Kirchstr. 35
D-35440 Linden
Email: embrueckel@gmx.de