ABSTRACT
Background: Perforator flap surgery is a complex surgery that is based on the use
of a highly precise microsurgical technique that differs slightly from a conventional
free flap, especially the intramuscular dissection of the pedicle. Herein, we report
a new model of a perforator flap in rat, the anteromedial thigh flap, as a teaching
model of a perforator flap. It is based on a constant musculocutaneous perforator
that arises from the muscular vessels for the gracilis muscle. Material and Methods:
Twenty Wistar rats were used in this study. In 10 rats, an anatomical study was performed
by means of anatomical dissection, Chinese ink injection, and microangiography studies,
and in 10 rats, a flap transplantation study was carried out by means of transferring
a pedicled perforator flap to the abdomen and monitoring its viability by direct inspection
on the seventh day. Results: Anatomical studies revealed a constant perforator that
has an average length of pedicle up to 20 mm, an external diameter from 0.2 to 0.3
mm, and supplies blood to an area of approximately 3 × 3 cm of the anteromedial region
of the thigh. In the flap studies, all the flaps survived on the seventh day after
operation. Conclusions: The anteromedial thigh perforator flap is a reliable, reproducible
inexpensive, replicates the handling of a perforator flap very closely, and has an
easy method to record the outcomes by visual inspection, so we think that it is a
useful tool as a teaching model for training a perforator flap in the preclinical
setting.
KEYWORDS
Perforator flap - microsurgical training model - rat
REFERENCES
1 Blondeel P N, Morris S F, Hallock G G, Neligan P. Perforator Flaps: Anatomy, Technique
and Clinical Applications. Vol. 2. 1st ed. St. Louis, MO; Quality Medical Publishing
2006: 1042
2
Seaber A V.
Laboratory design in preparing for elective microvascuiar surgery.
Hand Clin.
1985;
1
233-245
3
Macintyre I MC, Munro A.
Simulation in surgical training: trainee surgeons need to acquire skills outside the
operating theatre.
BMJ.
1990;
300
1088-1089
4
Ozkan O, Coskunfirat O K, Ozgentas H E.
A new experimental flap model: free muscle perforator flap.
Ann Plast Surg.
2003;
51
603-606
5
Hallock G G, Rice D C.
Cranial epigastric perforator flap: a rat model of a true perforator flap.
Ann Plast Surg.
2003;
50
393-397
6
Coskunfirat O K, Islamoglu K, Ozgentas H E.
Posterior thigh perforator-based flap: a new experimental model in rats.
Ann Plast Surg.
2002;
48
286-291
7
Oksar H S, Coskunfirat O K, Ozgentas H E.
Perforator-based flap in rats: a new experimental model.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2001;
108
125-131
8
Akyurek M, Safak T, Manavbasi I, Kecik A.
A rat musculocutaneous flap model: the biceps femoris musculocutaneous flap.
Ann Plast Surg.
2000;
45
305-312
9
Lorenzo A R, Álvarez A, García-Barreiro J, Centeno A, López E, Martelo F.
Design and creation of an experimental program of advanced training in reconstructive
microsurgery.
Microsurgery.
2006;
26
421-428
10 Greene E C. Anatomy of the Rat. New York; Hafner 1963
11
Dautel G, Braga da Siva J, Merle M.
Pedicled or free transfer of the gracilis muscle in rats.
J Reconstr Microsurg.
1991;
7
15-22
12
Yim K K, Lineaweaver W C, Siko P P et al..
Microvascular transfers of anterior and posterior gracilis muscles in rats.
Microsurgery.
1991;
12
262-267
13
Geddes C R, Morris S F, Neligan P C.
Perforator flaps: evolution, classification and applications.
Ann Plast Surg.
2003;
50
90-99
14
Wei F C, Mardini S.
Free-style free flaps.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2004;
114
910-916
Andrés Rodríguez LorenzoM.D.
Plaza de Varsovia no 2
Bajo C, 15008, A Coruña, Spain
Email: a.rodriguez.ps@gmail.com