ABSTRACT
The free inferior gluteal flap is a major secondary choice of autologous tissue for breast reconstruction if the TRAM flap is not an option. Loss of posterior thigh and popliteal sensibility is a frequent sequela of harvesting the free inferior gluteal musculocutaneous flap and the inferior gluteal artery perforator (I-GAP) flap. The posterior femoral cutaneous nerve of the thigh lies directly on the deep surface of the gluteus maximus muscle, having a very close anatomic relationship with the inferior gluteal artery. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the anatomy of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN), its branches, and their relationship with the inferior gluteal artery (IGA). Eighteen fresh human pelvic halves were dissected for examination during harvesting of the inferior gluteal myocutaneous free flap, to determine if a nerve-sparing approach was possible and how this information might impact on I-GAP flap harvest.
Seventeen of 18 pelvic halves had at least some of the PFCN branches intact after isolation of the IGA pedicle and flap elevation. Three of 18 of the pelvic halves had the entire PFCN and its branches intact after flap elevation. One of 18 pelvic halves required complete transection of the PFCN and its branches in order to isolate the IGA pedicle.
In 94.5 percent of the pelvic halve dissections, it was possible to maintain at least a portion of the PFCN intact after isolation of the inferior gluteal artery pedicle while harvesting the free inferior gluteal myocutaneous flap. These findings support a nerve-sparing approach to inferior gluteal myocutaneous flap elevation to minimize the sequela of posterior thigh anesthesia. These data also emphasize the intimate relationship of the PFCN and the gluteal artery and the real possibility of injury to the PFCN during I-GAP harvest.
KEYWORDS
Free inferior gluteal flap harvest - posterior femoral cutaneous nerve sparing - I-GAP
REFERENCES
-
1
Paletta C E, Bostwick J, Nahai F.
The inferior gluteal free flap in breast reconstruction.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1989;
84
875-883
-
2
Elliott L F.
Options for donor sites for autogenous tissue breast reconstruction.
Clin Plast Surg.
1994;
21
177-189
-
3
Nahai F.
Inferior gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction.
Perspect Plast Surg.
1992;
6
65
-
4
Elkowitz A, Colen S, Slavin S, Seibert J, Weinstein M, Shaw W.
Various methods of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: an economic comparison.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1993;
92
77-83
-
5
Fujino T, Harashina T, Aoyagi F.
Reconstruction for aplasia of the breast and pectoral region by microvascular transfer of a free flap from the buttock.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1975;
56
178
-
6
Shaw W W.
Bilateral free flap breast reconstruction.
Clin Plast Surg.
1994;
21
297
-
7 Randle P M, Nahai F. Gluteal and other free flaps for breast reconstruction. In: Kroll S Reconstructive Plastic Surgery for Cancer. St. Louis, MO; Mosby 1996: 295-308
-
8
Boustred A M, Nahai F.
Inferior gluteal free flap breast reconstruction.
Clin Plast Surg.
1998;
25
275-282
-
9
Hultmann S, Zenn M R.
Functional unilateral gluteoplasty for fecal incontinence: technical refinements, donor site morbidity, and long-term outcome.
Plast Surg Forum.
2003;
26
247-248
-
10 Serafin D. The gluteus maximus muscle-musculocutaneous flap. In: Serafin D Atlas of Microsurgical Composite Tissue Transplantation. Philadelphia, PA; W.B. Saunders 1996: 259
-
11
Codner M A, Nahai F.
The gluteal free flap breast reconstruction: making it work.
Clin Plast Surg.
1994;
21
289-296
-
12 Hollinshead W H. Anatomy for Surgeons: The Back and Limbs. Vol 3. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA; Harper & Row 1982: 596
-
13
Hughes P J, Brown T C.
An approach to posterior femoral cutaneous nerve block.
Anesth Intens Care.
1986;
14
350-351
-
14
Vasudeva G I, Shields C B.
Isolated injection to the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve.
Neurosurgery.
1989;
25
835-838
-
15
Chutkow J G.
Posterior femoral cutaneous neuralgia.
Muscle Nerve.
1988;
11
1146-1148
-
16
Kosinski C.
The course, mutual relations, and distribution of the cutaneous nerves of the metazonal region of leg and foot.
J Anat.
1926;
60
274-297
-
17 Moore KL Clinically Oriented Anatomy: The Lower Limb. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD; Williams & Wilkins 1992: 413-420
-
18
Dumitru D, Nelson M R.
Posterior femoral cutaneous nerve conduction.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
1990;
71
979-982
-
19
Nakanishi T, Kanno Y, Kaneshige T.
Comparative morphological remarks on the origin of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve.
Anat Anz.
1976;
139
8-23
-
20
Akita K, Sakamoto H, Sato T.
Stratificational relationship among the main nerves from the dorsal division of the sacral plexus and the innervation of the piriformis.
Anat Rec.
1992;
233
633-642
-
21
Tillmann B.
Variations in the pathway of the inferior gluteal nerve.
Anat Anz.
1979;
145
293-302
-
22
Chiba S.
Multiple positional relationships of nerves arising from the sacral plexus to the piriformis muscle in humans.
Kaibogaku Zasshi.
1992;
67
691-724
Michael R ZennM.D. F.A.C.S.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Duke University Medical Center
Box 3358, Durham, NC 27710
