A Standardized Method for Assigning Gestational Age: A Tool for Measuring Gestational Age Based Newborn Intensive Care Outcomes

ABSTRACT

We developed a computer-generated algorithm for standardizing the assignment of a best gestational age. Our database collected information on maternal last menstrual period (LMP), prenatal ultrasonography, obstetrical estimated date of confinement (EDC), use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), and newborn assessment based on the Ballard examination. The algorithm for determining best gestational age was developed based on the literature on the accuracy of prenatal and neonatal dating. We examined the performance of the algorithm using patients admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with a best gestational age ≤ 32 completed weeks. Based on agreement of the obstetric EDC with either the first-trimester ultrasonography or LMP and first- and second-trimester ultrasonography, 64.4% of patients were classified as having certain dating. The Ballard assessment played a role in assigning a best gestational age in 11.3% of patients. We demonstrated differences in outcomes based on dating certainty within subpopulations in our NICU. An objective standardized methodology for assigning gestational age is a useful tool for comparing gestational age-based outcome measures between institutions.

KEYWORDS

Algorithm - standardizing gestational age measurement

REFERENCES

• 1 Vermont Oxford Network Database Manual of Operations for Infants born in 2003, Release 7.0 Burlington, VT; Vermont Oxford Network, Inc. 2002
• 2 Richardson D, Tarnow-Mordi W O, Lee S K. Risk adjustment for quality improvement.  Pediatrics. 1999;  103(1, suppl E) 255-265
• 3 Lorenz J M. The outcome of extreme prematurity.  Semin Perinatol. 2001;  25 348-359
• 4 Gould J B, Madan A, Qin C, Chavez G. Perinatal outcomes in two dissimilar immigrant populations in the United States: a dual epidemiologic paradox.  Pediatrics. 2003;  111 e676-e682
• 5 Garite T J, Clark R, Thorp J. Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  191 481-487
• 6 Grennert L, Persson P H, Gennser G. Benefits of ultrasonic screening of a pregnant population.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1978;  78 5-14
• 7 Robinson H. Sonar measurement of fetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy.  BMJ. 1973;  4 28-31
• 8 Bennett M J, Little G, Dewhurst J, Chamberlain G. Predictive value of ultrasound measurement in early pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;  89 338-341
• 9 Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Gardosi J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  174 276-281
• 10 Mongelli M, Yuxin N G, Biswas A, Chew S. Accuracy of ultrasound dating formulae in the late second-trimester in pregnancies conceived with in-vitro fertilization.  Acta Radiol. 2003;  44 452-455
• 11 Ballard J L, Khoury J C, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman B L, Lipp R. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants.  J Pediatr. 1991;  119 417-423
• 12 Donovan E F, Tyson J E, Erhrenkranz R A et al.. Inaccuracy of Ballard scores before 28 weeks' gestation.  J Pediatr. 1999;  135 147-152
• 13 Savitz D A, Terry Jr J W, Dole N, Thorp Jr J M, Siega-Riz A M, Herring A H. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  187 1660-1666
• 14 Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S. A comparison of the ability of a sonographically measured biparietal diameter and the last menstrual period to predict the spontaneous onset of labor.  Obstet Gynecol. 1990;  76 336-338
• 15 Sen C. The use of first trimester ultrasound in routine practice.  J Perinat Med. 2001;  29 212-221