ABSTRACT
The prevention of preterm delivery (PTD) is a major desiderate in contemporary obstetrics
and a societal necessity. The means to achieve this goal remain elusive, and the research
efforts have been punctuated by several ineffective intervention proposals. More recently,
new areas of proposed preventive strategy have arisen, focusing on cervical competence,
subclinical infection, and hormonal effects. This review, based on a comprehensive
and unbiased review of the available literature, will address the rationale and current
status of these new concepts of significant clinical interest. We will describe the
microcosm of thought and research dedicated to the prevention of PTD during the last
10 years, and the arduous efforts to establish a linkage between predictive observations
and therapeutic hypotheses. In its first part, the review will discuss the recently
emerging view that regardless of the preterm labor etiology, a common pathway is eventually
reached, reflected in cervical changes. The new concept of functional cervical insufficiency
is addressed from the perspective of cervical assessment by ultrasound. Although the
existing research has not accurately quantified yet the usefulness of ultrasound cervical
examination, the technique has become commonplace. Several recent studies have demonstrated
a continuum of risk between shorter cervix on ultrasound and higher rate of PTD, leading
to the hypothetical argument that women with short cervix on ultrasound might benefit
from cervical cerclage. Observational and randomized clinical trials of cerclage as
a modality of pregnancy prolongation have provided conflicting results. The relative
paucity of data and the conflicting nature of the available evidence dictate caution
whenever decisions for cervical monitoring or intervention are made.
KEYWORDS
Preterm delivery - prediction - prevention - cervical insufficiency - cervical length
- cerclage
REFERENCES
1
Martin J A, Hamilton B E, Sutton P D et al..
Births: final data for 2002.
Natl Vital Stat Rep.
2003;
52
1-113
2
Romero R, Mazor M, Munoz H et al..
The preterm labor syndrome.
Ann NY Acad Sci.
1994;
734
414-429
3
Rust O A, Atlas R O, Reed J et al..
Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester:
why cerclage therapy may not help.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2001;
185
1098-1105
4
Novy M J.
Cervical cerclage [letter].
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2002;
187
1426-1427
5
Mann E C, McLaren W D, Hoyt O B.
The physiology and clinical significance of the uterine isthmus.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1961;
81
209-222
6
Herman G E.
Note on Emmet's operation as a preventive of abortion.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1902;
2
256-257
7
Yost N P, Bloom S L, Twickler D M.
Pitfalls in the ultrasonic cervical length measurement for predicting preterm birth.
Obstet Gynecol.
1999;
93
510-516
8
Jackson G M, Ludmir J, Bader T J.
The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length.
Obstet Gynecol.
1992;
79
214-218
9
Eppel W, Schurz B, Frigo P et al..
Vaginal ultrasound in the puerperium: cervix and lower uterine segment on the first
post partum day and uterus six weeks post partum.
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol.
1992;
196
217-220
10
Zalar Jr R W.
Early cervical length, preterm prelabor and gestational age at delivery. Is there
a relationship?.
J Reprod Med.
1998;
43
1027-1033
11
Guzman E R, Mellon C, Vintzileos A M et al..
Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks' gestation
in women at risk for pregnancy loss, or preterm birth.
Obstet Gynecol.
1998;
92
31-37
12
Okitsu O, Mimura T, Nakayama T et al..
Early prediction of preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonography.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
1992;
2
402-409
13
Ayers J, DeGrood P, Compton A et al..
Sonographic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancy: diagnosis and management of
preterm cervical effacement in patients at risk for premature delivery.
Obstet Gynecol.
1988;
71
939-944
14
Kushnir O, Vigil D A, Izquierdo L et al..
Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length changes during normal pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1990;
162
991-993
15
Iams J D, Goldenberg R L, Meis P J et al..
The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery.
N Engl J Med.
1996;
334
567-572
16
Imseis H M, Albert T A, Iams J D.
Identifying twin gestation at low risk for preterm birth with a transvaginal ultrasonographic
cervical measurement at 24 to 26 weeks' gestation.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1997;
177
1149-1155
17
To M S, Skentou C, Cicero S et al..
Cervical length in triplets: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2000;
16
515-518
18
Iams J D, Goldenberg R L, Mercer B M et al..
The preterm prediction study: recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1998;
178
1035-1040
19
Goldenberg R L, Iams J D, Mercer B M et al..
The preterm prediction study: the value of new vs. standard risk factors in predicting
early and all spontaneous preterm births.
Am J Public Health.
1998;
88
233-238
20
Heath V CF, Southall T R, Souka A P et al..
Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
1998;
12
312-317
21
Goldenberg R L, Iams J D, Das A et al..
The preterm prediction study: sequential cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing
for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2000;
182
636-643
22
Althuisius S M, Dekker G A, van Geijn H P et al..
Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): study design
and preliminary results.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2000;
183
823-829
23 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Assessment of Risk Factors
for Preterm Birth. Practice bulletin 31. Washington, DC; American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists 2001
24
Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V et al..
Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous birth.
JAMA.
2001;
286
1340-1348
25
Watson W J, Stevens D, Welter S et al..
Observations on the sonographic measurement of cervical length and the risk of preterm
birth.
J Matern Fetal Med.
1999;
8
17-19
26
Iams J D, Newman R B, Thom E A et al..
Frequency of uterine contractions and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth.
N Engl J Med.
2002;
346
250-255
27
Berghella V, Tolosa I E, Kuhlman K et al..
Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm
delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1997;
177
723-730
28
Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V.
Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18-22 weeks gestation and the risk of
preterm delivery.
Obstet Gynecol.
1998;
92
902-907
29
Yang J H, Kuhlman K, Daly S et al..
Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester cervical sonography in twin pregnancies.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2000;
15
288-291
30
Leitich H, Brunbauer M, Kaider A et al..
Cervical length and dilatation of the internal cervical os detected by vaginal ultrasonography
as markers for preterm delivery: a systematic review.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1999;
181
1465-1472
31
Guzman E R, Vintzileos A M, McLean D A et al..
The natural history of a positive response to transfundal pressure in women at risk
for cervical incompetence.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1997;
176
634-638
32
Yost N P, Owen J, Berghella V et al..
Second-trimester cervical sonography: features other than cervical length to predict
spontaneous preterm birth.
Obstet Gynecol.
2004;
103
457-462
33
Naim A, Haberman S, Burgess T et al..
Changes in cervical length and the risk of preterm labor.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2002;
186
887-889
34
Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F et al..
Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: a new
perspective.
J Ultrasound Med.
1995;
14
719-724
35
Goldenberg R L, Iams J D, Miodovnik M et al..
The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1996;
175
1047-1053
36
Guzman E R, Walters C, O'Reilly-Groon C et al..
Use of cervical ultrasonography in prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin
gestations.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2000;
183
1108-1113
37
Vayssière C, Favre R, Audibert F et al..
Cervical length and funneling at 22 and 27 weeks to predict spontaneous birth before
32 weeks in twin pregnancies: a French prospective multicenter study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2002;
187
1596-1604
38
Poggi S H, Ghidini A, Landy H J et al..
Role of transvaginal sonographic cervical length in predicting spontaneous preterm
delivery in triplet pregnancies with therapeutic cerclage.
J Reprod Med.
2003;
48
785-788
39
Dor J, Shalev J, Mashiach S, Blankstein J, Serr D M.
Elective cervical suture of twin pregnancies diagnosed ultrasonically in the first
trimester following induced ovulation.
Gynecol Obstet Invest.
1982;
13
55-60
40
Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J et al..
Multicenter and controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of
preterm delivery.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1984;
91
731-735
41
Rush R W, Isaacs S, McPherson K et al..
A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk for preterm
delivery.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1984;
91
724-730
42
MacNaughton M C, Chalmers I G, Dubowitz V et al..
Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1993;
100
516-523
43
Harger J H, Archer D F, Marchese S G et al..
Etiology of recurrent pregnancy losses and outcome of subsequent pregnancies.
Obstet Gynecol.
1983;
62
574-581
44
Burger M, Weber-Rossler T, Willmann M.
Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study
and new standards to improve the interobserver variability.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
1997;
9
188-193
45
Guzman E R, Forster J K, Vintzileos A M et al..
Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical
cerclage.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
1998;
12
323-327
46
Kurup M, Goldkrand J.
Cervical incompetence: elective, emergent, or urgent cerclage.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1999;
181
240-246
47
Heath V CF, Souka A P, Erasmus I et al..
Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: the value of Shirodkar suture for the short
cervix.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
1998;
12
318-322
48
Berghella V, Daly S F, Tolosa J E et al..
Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in
patients with high-risk pregnancies: does cerclage prevent prematurity?.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1999;
181
809-815
49
Hibbard J U, Snow J, Moawad A H.
Short cervical length by ultrasound and cerclage.
J Perinatol.
2000;
20
161-165
50
Novy M J, Gupta A, Wothe D D et al..
Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2001;
184
1447-1456
51
Hassan S S, Romero R, Maymon E et al..
Does cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix?.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2001;
184
1325-1331
52
Newman R B, Krombach R S, Myers M C et al..
Effect of cerclage on obstetrical outcome in twin gestations with a shortened cervical
length.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2002;
186
634-640
53
Rust O A, Atlas R O, Jones K J et al..
A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically
detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2000;
183
830-835
54
Althuisius S M, Dekker G A, Hummel P et al..
Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT):
therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2001;
185
1106-1112
55
To M S, Alfirevic Z, Heath V CF et al..
Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised
controlled trial.
Lancet.
2004;
363
1849-1853
56
Groom K M, Shennan A H, Bennett P R.
Ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: outcome depends on preoperative cervical length
and presence of visible membranes at time of cerclage.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2002;
187
445-449
57
Guzman E R, Shen-Schwartz S, Benito C et al..
The relationship between placental histology and cervical ultrasonography in women
at risk for pregnancy loss and spontaneous preterm birth.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1999;
181
793-797
58
Bachmann L M, Coomarasamy H, Honest H et al..
Elective cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2003;
82
398-404
59
Drakeley A J, Roberts D, Alfirevic Z.
Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: meta-analysis of randomized
trials.
Obstet Gynecol.
2003;
102
621-627
60
Belej-Rak T, Okun N, Windrim R et al..
Effectiveness of cervical cerclage for a sonographically shortened cervix: a systematic
review and meta-analysis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2003;
189
1679-1687
61
Althuisius S M, Dekker G A, Hummel P et al..
Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with
bed rest versus bed rest alone.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2003;
189
907-910
62
Van den Hof M, Crane J.
Ultrasound cervical assessment in predicting preterm birth.
J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can.
2001;
23
418-421
63
Iams J D.
Prediction and early detection of preterm birth.
Obstet Gynecol.
2003;
101
402-412
64 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Cervical Insufficiency. Practice
bulletin 48. Washington, DC; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2003
65
Guzman E, Houlihan C, Vintzileos A et al..
The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women
treated with emergency cerclage.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1996;
175
471-476
66
Dijkstra K, Funai E, O'Neill L et al..
Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery.
Obstet Gynecol.
2000;
96
346-350
Alex C VidaeffM.D.
Associate Professor, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics,
Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas-Houston Medical School
6431 Fannin, Suite 3.604, Houston, TX 77030