Endoscopy 2006; 38(4): 368-375
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-921194
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Deep Sedation with Propofol for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Children, Administered by Specially Trained Pediatricians: a Prospective Case Series with Emphasis on Side Effects

E.  Barbi1 , P.  Petaros1 , L.  Badina1 , T.  Pahor1 , I.  Giuseppin1 , E.  Biasotto1 , S.  Martelossi2 , G.  Di Leo2 , A.  Sarti3 , A.  Ventura1
  • 1Dept. of Pediatrics, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
  • 2Dept. of Gastroenterology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
  • 3Dept. of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 14 December 2004

Accepted after revision 7 June 2005

Publication Date:
05 May 2006 (online)

Preview

Background and Study Aims: The need to administer procedural sedation to children has increased in recent years, as has experience in this field among nonanesthesiologists. Using propofol makes it easier to achieve sufficiently deep sedation. There is a considerable literature on the administration of propofol by nonanesthesiologists for gastroscopy in adults, but very few data are available on this issue in children. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of procedural sedation with propofol for gastroscopy in a pediatric ward with trained personnel and monitoring facilities.
Patients and Methods: A training protocol was developed to educate nurses and residents. Children requiring gastroscopy were included in the study prospectively and underwent procedural sedation with propofol administered by nonanesthesiologists.
Results: A total of 811 upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were carried out with procedural sedation. Sedation was achieved in all procedures, and all but three (0.4 %) were conducted successfully. None of the patients required intubation. Stridor with signs of upper airway obstruction occurred in 14 of the 811 procedures (1.7 %). Laryngoscopy was required to manage difficulties in introducing the gastroscope in 16 of the 811 procedures (2.0 %). Major desaturation requiring a short course of ventilation occurred in six procedures (0.7 %), and transient desaturation that resolved spontaneously occurred in 97 of the procedures (12 %).
Conclusions: Administration of propofol by nonanesthesiologists for gastroscopy examinations in children was successful in this study, but was associated with a small risk of potentially severe complications. Although the residents were generally able to administer procedural sedation alone, constant and immediate availability of anesthesiological support continues to be mandatory.

References

E. Barbi, M. D.

Clinica Pediatrica, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo · University of Trieste

Via dell’Istria 65/1 · 34137 Trieste · Italy

Fax: +39-40 3785 362

Email: ebarbi@libero.it