Protecting Group Effects on the Efficiency of the Ruthenium-Catalyzed Alder-Ene Reaction

Abstract

The efficiency of the ruthenium-catalyzed Alder-ene reaction of hydroxy alkenes depends heavily on the nature of the O-protecting groups employed, as well as the length of the carbon spacer between the hydroxy and alkene group.

Alder-ene reaction - ruthenium catalysis - O-protecting groups

References

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1A">1a</A> Trost BM. Indolese A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1993,  115:  4361 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1B">1b</A> Trost BM. Indolese AF. Müller TJJ. Treptow B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1995,  117:  615 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1C">1c</A> Dérien S. Ropartz L. Le Paih J. Dixneuf PH. J. Org. Chem.  1999,  64:  3524 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1D">1d</A> Trost BM. Machacek M. Schnaderbeck MJ. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  1761 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1E">1e</A> Trost BM. Toste FD. Pinkerton AB. Chem. Rev.  2001,  101:  2067 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1F">1f</A> Trost BM. Surivet J.-P. Toste FD. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2001,  123:  2897 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1G">1g</A> Trost BM. Surivet J.-P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2001,  40:  1468 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1H">1h</A> Trost BM. Pinkerton AB. Toste FD. Sperrle M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2001,  123:  12504 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1I">1i</A> Trost BM. Chisholm JD. Wrobleski ST. Jung M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  12420 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1J">1j</A> Trost BM. Shen HC. Pinkerton AB. Chem.-Eur. J.  2002,  8:  2341 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-1K">1k</A> Trost BM. Machacek MR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2002,  41:  4693 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-2">2</A>

(1 Z ,4 E )-( R )-1-Trimethylsilyl-2-(2′-methyl-3′- tert -butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-6-acetoxy-1,4-hexadiene. CpRu(MeCN)₃PF₆ (39 mg, 0.090 mmol) under Ar was treated with an acetone solution (2 mL) of 1-acetoxy-3-butene (170 mg, 1.5 mmol) and (R)-1-(trimethylsilyl)-4-methyl-5-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-1-pentyne (123 mg, 0.300 mmol). The yellow solution was stirred at r.t. for 20 h. The reaction mixture was passed through a short plug of silica and concentrated in vaccuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography (increasing polarity from 1% to 10% EtOAc in petroleum spirit), which gave the title compound (134 mg, 0.256 mmol, 85% yield) as a colorless oil. R_f (11% EtOAc in petroleum spirit): 0.67. [α]_D ²⁵ +1.1 (c 6.7, CH₂Cl₂). MS (ES+): m/z (%) = 463.28 (100) [M - OAc], 540.32 (23) [M + NH₄ ⁺], 545.29 (33) [M + Na⁺], 561.26 (12) [M + K⁺], 655.20 (33) [M + Cs⁺]. HRMS (ES+): m/z [M + Na⁺] calcd for C₃₁H₄₆O₃NaSi₂: 545.2883; found: 545.2904. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 0.06 [9 H, s, (CH₃)₃Si], 0.86 (3 H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH₃CH), 1.06 [9 H, s, (CH₃)₃CSi], 1.82-2.02 (2 H, m, CH₃CH and CHCH₂C=), 2.05 [3 H, s, CH₃C(O)O], 2.27 (1 H, dd, J = 12.9, 4.8 Hz, CH₃CH), 2.74 (2 H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, =CHCH₂CH=), 3.47 (2 H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH₂OSi), 4.52 (2 H, d, J = 6.3 Hz, CH₂OAc), 5.23 (1 H, s, TMSCH), 5.54 (1 H, dt, J = 15.3, 6.3 Hz, AcOCH₂CH=CH), 5.73 (1 H, dt, J = 15.6, 6.9 Hz, AcOCH₂CH=CH), 7.36-7.44 (6 H, m, SiPh), 7.62-7.68 (4 H, m, SiPh). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 0.8 (CH₃), 16.4 (CH₃), 19.5 (C), 21.2 (CH), 27.2 (CH₃), 34.2 (CH₃), 39.6 (CH₂), 41.8 (CH₂), 65.3 (CH₂), 69.5 (CH₂), 125.8 (CH), 126.8 (CH), 127.8 (CH), 129.8 (CH), 134.1 (C), 134.3 (CH), 135.9 (CH), 155.3 (C), 171.0 (C=O).

For examples of internal coordination directing β-hydrogen elimination in Alder-ene reactions:

<A NAME="RD19204ST-3A">3a</A> Slugovc C. Mereiter K. Schmid R. Kirchner K. Organometallics  1999,  18:  1011 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-3B">3b</A> Trost BM. Tanoury GJ. Lautens M. Chan C. MacPherson DT. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1994,  116:  4255 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-4">4</A>

Whilst there are examples of other processes occurring when β-hydrogen elimination is inhibited,⁵ under the mild conditions employed only starting materials are recovered.

<A NAME="RD19204ST-5A">5a</A> Mitsudo T. Zhang S.-W. Nagao M. Wantanabe Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.  1991,  598 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-5B">5b</A> Trost BM. Imi K. Indolese AF. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1993,  115:  8831 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-5C">5c</A> Mirsudo T. Naruse H. Kondo T. Ozaki Y. Wantanabe Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1994,  33:  580 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-5D">5d</A> Trost BM. Toste FD. Shen H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2000,  122:  2379 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-6A">6a</A> Jaouen G. Vessieres A. Buttler IS. Acc. Chem. Res.  1993,  26:  361 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-6B">6b</A> Pearson AJ. Park JG. J. Org. Chem.  1992,  57:  1744 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-6C">6c</A> Pearson AJ. Lee K. J. Org. Chem.  1994,  59:  2304 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-6D">6d</A> Janetka JW. Rich DH. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1995,  117:  10585 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-6E">6e</A> Pearson AJ. Zhang P. Lee K. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  6581 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-6F">6f</A> Pigge FC. Coniglio JJ. Curr. Org. Chem.  2001,  5:  757 

For examples of catalytic deactivation of CpRu⁺ complexes by η⁶-arene coordination, see:

<A NAME="RD19204ST-7A">7a</A> Trost BM. Imi K. Indolese AF. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1993,  115:  8831 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-7B">7b</A> Becker E. Slugovc C. Rüba E. Standfest-Hauser C. Mereiter K. Schmid R. Kirchner K. J. Organomet. Chem.  2002,  649:  55 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-7C">7c</A> Rüba E. Schmid R. Kirchner K. Calhourda MJ. J. Organomet. Chem.  2003,  648:  204 

<A NAME="RD19204ST-8A">8a</A>

For CpRu(η⁶-anisole)BF₄: ¹H NMR (d ₆-acetone): δ = 5.51 (s, 5 H, CpH), 6.13-6.53 (m, 5 H, ArH).

<A NAME="RD19204ST-8B">8b</A> Volkenau NA. Bolesova IN. Shulpina LS. Kitaigorodskii AN. Kravtsov DM. J. Organomet. Chem.  1985,  288:  341