Functional, Electrophysiologic, and Morphometric Evaluation of Nerve Regeneration from Coaptation on Regenerated Nerve Fibers: Experimental Study in Rabbits

The importance of a sufficient number of nerve fibers at a proximal coaptation site is indisputable for the successful repair of nerves; however, the quality of nerve fibers required at this site has yet to be defined. The present study deals with the question of whether it is necessary to trim nerves back to unaffected neuronal tissue or whether the coaptation on recently regenerated nerve fibers, commonly believed to produce a poor quality of repair can, in fact, produce adequate nerve regeneration.

Twenty New Zealand White rabbits received a standardized crush lesion on the peroneal nerves of both hind legs. Four weeks later, the nerves of the left hind legs (n = 20) were transected 10 mm distal to the previous crush lesion and coapted to the freshly regenerated nerve fibers. For comparison, on 10 right hind legs, the nerves were transected at the site of previous crushing (Group A, superimposition) or 10 mm proximal to the site of crushing on unscathed nerve fibers (Group B). Eleven weeks later, the quality of nerve regeneration was assessed by the toe-spreading reflex, electrophysiologic data, muscle weight, and histomorphologic evaluation.

In the animals of Group A, the quality of nerve regeneration following coaptation on the regrown axons did not differ in any of the examined parameters from the quality of nerve fibers outgrown from the site of the superimposed lesion. Both lesions led to a completely functional reinnervation. Also in Group B, nerve action potential recording and histologic data on both sides did not reveal a significant difference between the number and maturation of nerve fibers equidistant from the suture site, shortly before muscle entrance.

With this coaptation model, it could be demonstrated in the peroneal nerve of rabbits, that coaptation to recently regenerated nerve fibers leads to a significant functional regeneration.

KEYWORDS

Functional reinnervation - nerve regeneration - intraoperative neurography - coaptation on regenerated nerve fibers

REFERENCES

• 1 Meyer V E, Stallmach T H, Burg D. Assessment of the nerve quality at the coaptation site by nerve function evaluation. Proceedings of the 5th International Muscle Symposium May 15-21, 2000 Vienna, Austria;
• 2 Omer G E, Spinner M. Management of Peripheral Nerve Problems . London; Saunders 1980
• 3 Kline D G, Happel L T. A quarter century's experience with intraoperative nerve action potential recording.  J Can Sci Neurol. 1993;  20 3-10
• 4 Cajal Y RS. Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System . London; University Press 1928
• 5 Ranson S W. The structure of the spinal ganglia and of the spinal nerves.  J Comp Neurol. 1912;  22 159-169
• 6 Shawe G DH. On the number of branches formed by regenerating nerve-fibers.  Brit J Surg. 1954;  42 474-488
• 7 Young J Z. Advances in Surgery I . New York; Interscience Publishers 1949
• 8 Brushart T ME. Preferential motor reinnervation: a sequential double-labeling study.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1990;  1 281-287
• 9 Edbladh M, Edström A. Environmental factors contribute to the enhanced regeneration of frog sciatic sensory axons by a conditioning lesion.  Acta Physiol Scand. 1989;  135 169-172
• 10 McQuarrie I G. The effect of a conditioning lesion on the regeneration of motor axons.  Brain Res. 1978;  152 597-602
• 11 Beer G M, Steurer J, Meyer V E. Standardizing nerve crushes with a non-serrated hemostat.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2001;  17 531-534
• 12 Beer G M, Meyer V E, Burg D. Tattoo agents for nerve marking in experimental surgery.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2001;  17 437-440
• 13 Gutmann E. Factors affecting recovery of motor functions after nerve lesions.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1942;  5 81-95
• 14 Gutmann E, Guttmann L, Medawar P B, Young J Z. The rate of regeneration of nerve.  J Exp Biol. 1942;  19 14-44
• 15 Happel L T, Kline D G. Nerve lesions in continuity. In: Gelbermann R Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction . vol 1 Philadelphia; JB Lippincott. 1991: 601-616
• 16 Chen L E, Seaber A V, Glisson R R et al.. The functional recovery of peripheral nerves following defined acute crush injuries.  J Orthop Res. 1992;  10 657-664
• 17 Haftek J, Thomas P K. Electron-microscope observations on the effects of localized crush injuries in the connective tissues of peripheral nerve.  J Anat. 1968;  103 233-243
• 18 Bisby M A, Pollock B. Increased regeneration rate in peripheral nerve axons following double lesions: enhancement of the conditioning lesion phenomenon.  J Neurobiol. 1983;  14 467-472
• 19 Bisby M A. Enhancement of the conditioning lesion effect in rat sciatic motor axons after superimposition of conditioning and test lesions.  Exp Neurol. 1985;  90 385-394
• 20 Schmitz H C, Beer G M. The toe-spreading reflex of the rabbit revisited-functional evaluation of complete peroneal nerve lesions.  Lab Anim. 2001;  35 340-345
• 21 Hare G MT, Evans P J, Mackinnon S E et al.. Walking track analysis; a long-term assessment of peripheral nerve recovery.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  89 252-258
• 22 Kanaya F, Firell J C, Breidenbach W C. Sciatic function index, nerve conduction tests, muscle contraction and axon morphometry as indicators for regeneration.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;  98 1264-1274
• 23 Stanic M F, Micovic V, Potocnjak M, Draganic P, Sasso A, Mackinnon S E. The value of an operation microsope in peripheral nerve repair. An experimental study using a rat model of tibial nerve grafting.  Int Orthop. 1998;  22 107-110