J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20(1): 43-51
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-818049
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA

Immune Unresponsiveness by Intraportal UV-B-Irradiated Donor Antigen Administration Requires Persistence of Donor Antigen in a Nerve Allograft Model

Thomas H. Tung1 , Vaishali B. Doolabh1 , Susan E. Mackinnon1 , Daniel Hunter1 , M. Wayne Flye1
  • 1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Further Information

Publication History

accepted: August 5, 2003

Publication Date:
18 February 2004 (online)

The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanism of unresponsiveness produced by the intraportal administration of ultraviolet-B (UV-B)-irradiated donor antigen. Pretreated Buffalo rats accepted Lewis nerve allografts, had decreased in vitro T-cell reactivity, and demonstrated nerve regeneration and recovery of limb function, while rejecting third-party nerve allografts. Regenerated nerve grafts were then retransplanted into a second naïve recipient. Rejection of the retransplanted allograft by naïve donor-strain, but not recipient-strain, animals suggests that the allografts were completely replaced by host tissue. Pretreated Buffalo rats were also given a second Lewis allograft after the first had regenerated. The second allograft was rejected and in vitro immune reactivity was comparable to naïve animals. Because the unresponsiveness state was extinguished with loss of exposure to donor antigen, these findings suggest that the intraportal administration of UV-B-irradiated donor antigen works by anergic or suppressive regulatory, rather than deletional, mechanisms.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Mackinnon S E, Hudson A R. Clinical application of peripheral nerve transplantation.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  90 696-699
  • 2 Mackinnon S E. Nerve allotransplantation following severe tibial nerve injury-a case report.  Neurosurgery. 1996;  84 671-676
  • 3 Mackinnon S E, Doolabh V B, Novak C B, Trulock E P. Clinical outcome following nerve allograft transplantation.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107 1419-1429
  • 4 Bain J R, Mackinnon S E, Hudson A R, et al.. The peripheral nerve allograft: an assessment of regeneration across nerve allografts in rats immunosuppressed with Cyclosporin A.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  82 1052-1064
  • 5 Brenner M J, Tung T H, Jensen J N, Mackinnon S E. The spectrum of complications of immunosuppression: is the time right for hand transplantation?.  J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;  84A 1861-1870
  • 6 Genden E M, Mackinnon S E, Yu S, et al.. Pretreatment with portal venous ultraviolet B-irradiated donor alloantigen promotes donor-specific tolerance to rat nerve allografts.  Laryngoscope. 2001;  111 439-447
  • 7 Midha R, Mackinnon S E, Evan P J. Comparison of regeneration across nerve allografts with temporary or continuous CsA immunosuppression.  J Neurosurg. 1993;  78 90-100
  • 8 Midha R, Mackinnon S E, Becker L E. The fate of Schwann cells in peripheral nerve allografts.  Neuropath Exp Neurol. 1994;  53 316
  • 9 Grochowicz P, Romanuik A, Jedrzejewska A, Olszewski W L. Rejection pattern of nerve allografts-changes in graft and host cell determinants.  Transplant Proc. 1987;  19 1131-1132
  • 10 Atchabahian A, Doolabh V, Mackinnon S E, et al.. Indefinite survival of peripheral nerve allografts after temporary Cyclosporin A immunosuppression.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1998;  13 129-139
  • 11 Midha R, Evan P J, Mackinnon S E, Wade J A. Temporary immunosuppression for peripheral nerve allograft.  Transplant Proc. 1993;  25 532-536
  • 12 Atchabahian A, Genden E M, Mackinnon S E, et al.. Regeneration through long nerve grafts in the swine model.  Microsurgery. 1998;  18 379-382
  • 13 Tung T H, Mackinnon S E, Mohanakumar T. Long-term limb allograft survival using anti-CD40L antibody in a murine model.  Transplantation. 2003;  75 644-650
  • 14 Callery M P, Kamei T, Flye M W. Kupffer cell blockade inhibits induction of tolerance by the portal venous route.  Transplantation. 1989;  47 1092-1094
  • 15 Chase M W. Inhibition of experimental drug allergy by prior feeding of the sensitizing agents.  Proc Soc Exp Biol. 1946;  91 226
  • 16 Kripke M L. Effects of UV radiation on tumor immunity.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;  82 1392-1396
  • 17 Yu S, Nakafusa Y, Flye M W. Portal vein administration of donor cells promotes peripheral allospecific hyporesponsiveness and graft tolerance.  Surgery. 1994;  116 229-234
  • 18 Simon J C, Tigelaar R E, Bergstresser R. Ultraviolet B irradiation converts Langerhans cells from immunogenic to tolerogenic antigen presenting cells: induction of specific clonal anergy in CD4+ T helper-1 cells.  J Immunol. 1991;  146 485-491
  • 19 Dong V M, Womer K L, Sayegh M H. Transplantation tolerance: the concept and its applicability.  Pediatric Transplantation. 1999;  3 181-192
  • 20 Gudmundsdottir H, Turka L A. Transplantation tolerance: mechanisms and strategies?.  Sem Nephrol. 2000;  20 209-216
  • 21 Aradhye S, Turka L A. Will tolerance become a clinical reality?.  Am J Med Sci. 1997;  313 310-314
  • 22 Khan A, Tomita Y, Sykes M. Thymic dependence of loss of tolerance in mixed allogeneic bone marrow chimeras after depletion of donor antigen.  Transplantation. 1996;  62 380-387
  • 23 Morecki S, Leshem B, Eid A, Slavin S. Alloantigen persistence in induction and maintenance of transplantation tolerance.  J Exp Med. 1987;  165 1468-1480
  • 24 Ramsdell F, Fowlkes B J. Maintenance of in vivo tolerance by persistence of antigen.  Science. 1992;  257 1130-1134
  • 25 Kripke M L. Ultraviolet radiation and immunology: something new under the sun-presidential address.  Cancer Research. 1994;  54 6102-6105

Susan E MackinnonM.D. 

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery

Suite 5401, 660 South Euclid Ave.

St. Louis, MO 63110