Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2003; 20(7): 353-360
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-45282
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Placenta Previa: Does Its Type Affect Pregnancy Outcome?

Chi P. Dola, Thomas J. Garite, David D. Dowling, Diana Friend, David  Ahdoot, Tamerou Asrat
  • University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, and Long Beach Memorial, Women's Hospital, Long Beach, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 December 2003 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Our objective was to compare pregnancy outcomes associated with different types of placenta previa. This is a retrospective analysis of pregnancies complicated by placenta previa, from January 1990 to December 1997. Descriptive statistics and comparison analyses were performed. One hundred seventy-five singleton pregnancies beyond 24 weeks that were complicated by complete, partial, or marginal previa were included. Differences in pregnancy outcomes between complete, partial, and marginal previas were: onset of bleeding (29.9 ± 4.5 versus 32.5 ± 6.9 versus 32.7 ± 5.0 weeks, respectively, p < 0.05), antepartum hospitalization (60.7% versus 38.1% versus 35.1%, respectively, p < 0.05), gestation at delivery (34.7 ± 3.1 versus 37.4 ± 2.6 versus 36.1 ± 3.0 weeks, respectively, p < 0.05), birth weight (2498.3 ± 746.8 versus 2978.8 ± 568.3 versus 2813.4 ± 728.4 g, respectively, p < 0.05), and hysterectomy at time of cesarean delivery (20.5% versus 0% versus 8.1%, respectively, p < 0.05). For all outcome parameters, the partial and marginal previa groups did not differ. Women with complete placenta previa, as diagnosed with modern ultrasound techniques, had poorer pregnancy outcome. They were more likely to deliver prematurely and were more likely to require a hysterectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.

KEYWORDS

Placenta previa - pregnancy outcomes - cesarean hysterectomy

REFERENCES

  • 1 Green J R. Placenta previa and abruptio placenta. In: Creasy RK, Resnik R, eds. Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1994: 602-607
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 McShane P M, Heyl P S, Epstein M F. Maternal and perinatal morbidity resulting from placenta previa.  Obstet Gynecol . 1985;  65 176-182
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Silver R, Depp R, Sabbagha R E. et al . Placenta previa: aggressive expectant management.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1984;  150 15-22
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Frederiksen M C, Glassenberg R, Stika C S. Placenta previa: a 22-year analysis.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1999;  180 1432-1437
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Hibbard L T. Placenta previa.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1969;  104 172-184
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Crenshaw C, Jones D ED, Parker R T. Placenta previa: a survey of twenty years experience with improved perinatal survival by expectant therapy and cesarean delivery.  Obstet Gynecol Surv . 1973;  28 461-470
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Cotton D B, Read J A, Paul R H, Quilligan E J. The conservative aggressive management of placenta previa.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1980;  137 687-695
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Gorodeski I G, Bahari C M. The effect of placenta previa localization upon maternal and fetal-neonatal outcome.  J Perinat Med . 1987;  15 169-177
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Oppenheimer L W, Farine D, Ritchie J WK, Lewinsky R M, Telford J, Fairbanks L A. What is low-lying placenta?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1991;  165 1036-1038
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar