Synthesis of Enantiomers of Butane-1,2-diacetal-Protected Glyceraldehyde and of (R,R)-Butane-1,2-diacetal-Protected Glycolic Acid

Patrick Michel; Steven V. Ley

doi:10.1055/s-2003-40519

PAPER

Synthesis of Enantiomers of Butane-1,2-diacetal-Protected Glyceraldehyde and of (R,R)-Butane-1,2-diacetal-Protected Glycolic Acid

Patrick Michel, Steven V. Ley*
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge
Fax: Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK; e-Mail: svl1000@cam.ac.uk;

Abstract

All articles of this category

Abstract

A convenient and scalable synthesis of enantiomers of butane-2,3-diacetal-protected glyceraldehyde was accomplished from d-mannitol and l-ascorbic acid, respectively. The R-aldehyde was additionally converted to the (R,R)-butane-2,3-diacetal glycolic acid building block 1.

Key words

diacetal - glyceraldehydes - α-hydroxy acid - d-mannitol - l-ascorbic acid

Full Text

References

<A NAME="RP03103SS-1A">1a</A> Coppola GM. Schuster HF. α-Hydroxy Acids in Entantioselective Synthesis VCH; Weinheim: 1997.

<A NAME="RP03103SS-1B">1b</A> Hanessian S. Total Synthesis of Natural Products: The Chiron Approach Pergamon; Oxford: 1983.

<A NAME="RP03103SS-2A">2a</A> Helmchen G. Wierzchowski R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl 1984, 23: 60

<A NAME="RP03103SS-2B">2b</A> Kelly TR. Arvanitis A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25: 39

<A NAME="RP03103SS-2C">2c</A> Enomoto M. Ito Y. Katsuki T. Yamaguchi M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26: 1343

<A NAME="RP03103SS-2D">2d</A> Cardillo G. Orena M. Romero M. Sandri S. Tetrahedron 1989, 45: 1501

<A NAME="RP03103SS-2E">2e</A> Crimmins MT. Emmitte KA. Katz JD. Org. Lett. 2000, 2: 2165

<A NAME="RP03103SS-2F">2f</A> Jung JE. Ho H. Kim H.-D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41: 1793

<A NAME="RP03103SS-2G">2g</A> Yu H. Ballard CE. Wang D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 1835

<A NAME="RP03103SS-3A">3a</A> Ludwig JW. Newcomb M. Bergbreiter DE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27: 2731

<A NAME="RP03103SS-3B">3b</A> Renaud P. Seebach D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25: 843

<A NAME="RP03103SS-3C">3c</A> Pearson WH. Cheng M.-C. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51: 3746

<A NAME="RP03103SS-3D">3d</A> Pearson WH. Cheng M.-C. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52: 3176

<A NAME="RP03103SS-3E">3e</A> Renaud P. Abazi S. Helv. Chim. Acta 1996, 79: 1696

<A NAME="RP03103SS-3F">3f</A> Chang J.-W. Jang D.-P. Uang B.-J. Liao F.-L. Wang S.-L. Org. Lett. 1999, 1: 2061

<A NAME="RP03103SS-3G">3g</A> Andrus MB. Soma Sekhar BBV. Meredith E. Dalley NK. Org. Lett. 2000, 2: 3035

<A NAME="RP03103SS-4A">4a</A> Ley SV. Downham R. Edwards PJ. Innes JE. Woods M. Contemp. Org. Synth. 1995, 2: 365

<A NAME="RP03103SS-4B">4b</A> Downham R. Kim KS. Ley SV. Woods M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35: 769

<A NAME="RP03103SS-4C">4c</A> Boons G.-J. Downham R. Kim KS. Ley SV. Woods M. Tetrahedron 1994, 50: 7157

<A NAME="RP03103SS-4D">4d</A> Fujita M. Lainé D. Ley SV. J. Chem., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 1647

<A NAME="RP03103SS-5A">5a</A> Berens U. Leckel D. Oepen SC. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60: 8204

<A NAME="RP03103SS-5B">5b</A> Ley SV. Baeschlin DK. Dixon DJ. Foster AC. Ince SJ. Priepke HWM. Reynolds DJ. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101: 53

<A NAME="RP03103SS-6A">6a</A> Diez E. Dixon DJ. Ley SV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40: 2906

<A NAME="RP03103SS-6B">6b</A> Dixon DJ. Ley SV. Polara A. Sheppard T. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 3749

<A NAME="RP03103SS-6C">6c</A> Dixon DJ. Guarna A. Ley SV. Polara A. Rodriguez F. Synthesis 2002, 1973

<A NAME="RP03103SS-6D">6d</A> Dixon DJ. Ley SV. Rodriguez F. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 3753

<A NAME="RP03103SS-6E">6e</A> Dixon DJ. Ley SV. Rodriguez F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40: 4763

<A NAME="RP03103SS-7">7</A> Michel P. Ley SV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41: 3898

<A NAME="RP03103SS-8">8</A> Lichtenthaler FW. Jarglis P. Lorenz K. Synthesis 1988, 790

<A NAME="RP03103SS-9A">9a</A> Isbell HS. Frush HL. Carbohydr. Res. 1979, 72: 301

<A NAME="RP03103SS-9B">9b</A> Wei CC. De Bernardo S. Tengi JP. Borgese J. Weigele M. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50: 3462

<A NAME="RP03103SS-9C">9c</A> Abushanab E. Vemishetti P. Leiby RW. Singh HK. Mikkilineni AB. Wu DC.-J. Saibaba R. Panzica RP. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53: 2598

[α]_D of this aldehyde in CHCl₃ is not reliable because the value increases from -110 to -160 in two hours possibly due to an acid-catalysed decomposition. Nevertheless, the enantiomeric excess of 1 determined by chiral GC proved that the enantiomeric excess of 6 is at least 99%.