The Fate of Neurotization Techniques on Reinnervation after Denervation of the Gastrocnemius Muscle: An Experimental Study

ABSTRACT

In nerve injuries, if it is not possible to reinnervate muscle by using neurorrhaphy and nerve grafting technique, reinnervation should be provided by the use of neuroization-directly implanting motor nerve into muscle. A comparative study of three techniques of neurotization is presented in rabbits.

In this experimental study, a total of 40 white New Zealand rabbits were used and divided into four groups, each including 10 rabbits. In the first group (control-Group 1), only surgical exposure of the gastrocnemius muscle, main muscle nerve (tibial nerve), and peroneal nerve was done, without any injury to the nerves. In the second group (direct neurotization group-Group 2), the tibial nerve was transected, and the peroneal nerve, which had already been divided into fascicles, was implanted into the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscle aneural zone. In the third group (dual neurotization group-Group 3), the tibial nerve which had been transected and re-anastomosed, and the peroneal nerve were implanted into the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscle. In the last experimental group (hyperneurotization group-Group 4), fascicles of the peroneal nerve were implanted into the lateral head of the gastrocnemius, preserving the tibial nerve. Six months later, changes in the histologic pattern and the functional recovery of the gastrocnemius muscle were investigated. It was found that functional recovery was achieved in all neurotization groups.

Groups with the tibial nerve transected had less muscular weights than those of groups with the tibial nerve intact. EMG recordings showed that polyphasic and late potentials were frequently seen in groups with the tibial nerve transected. Degeneration and regeneration of myofibrils was observed in such groups as well. New motor end-plates, including vesicles, were formed in a scattered manner in all neurotization groups.

As a result, the authors conclude that direct and dual neurotization techniques are useful in peripheral nerve injuries, if it is not possible to reinnervate muscle by using neurorraphy and nerve grafting, and that there is no suggested superiority among these techniques.

KEYWORD

Neurotization - denervation and reinnervation - gastronuemius muscle - experimental

REFERENCES

• 1 Mackinnon S E, McLean J A, Hunter G A. Direct muscle neurotization recovers gastrocnemius muscle function.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1993;  9 77-80
• 2 Brunelli G A, Brunelli G R. Direct muscle neurotization.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1993;  9 81-90
• 3 Aitken J T. Growth of nerve implants in voluntary muscle.  J Anat . 1950;  84 38
• 4 Cheng N, Li X, Huang A. Experimental comparison of muscle contractility after three methods of reinnervation.  Ann Plast Surg . 1994;  33 166-170
• 5 Steindler A. The method of direct neurotization of paralyzed muscles.  Am J Orthop Surg . 1915;  13 33-45
• 6 McNamara M J, Garrett Jr E W, Seaber A V, Golgner J L. Neurorrhaphy, nerve grafting, and neurotization: a functional comparison of nerve reconstruction techniques.  J Hand Surg . 1987;  12A 354-360
• 7 Frey M, Gruber H, Holle J, Freilinger G. An experimental comparison of the different kinds of muscle reinnervation: nerve suture, nerve implantation, and muscular neurotization.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1982;  69 656-667
• 8 Hoffman H. Local re-innervation in partially denervated muscle: a histo-physiological study.  Austral J Experiment Biol Med Sci . 1950;  23 383-397
• 9 Sorbie C, Porter T L. Reinnervation of paralysed muscles by direct motor nerve implantation: an experimental study in the dog.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1969;  51B 156
• 10 Steindler A. Direct neurotization of paralyzed muscles: further study of the question of direct nerve implantation.  Am J Orthop Surg . 1916;  14 707
• 11 Freilinger G. A new technique to correct facial paralysis.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1975;  56 44
• 12 Thompson N. Autogenous free grafts of skeletal muscle: a preliminary experimental and clinical study.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1971;  71 11
• 13 Thompson N. Investigation of autogenous skeletal muscle free grafts in the dog: with a report of a successful free graft of skeletal muscle in man.  Transplantation . 1971;  12 353
• 14 Brenner H R, Sakmann B. Gating properties of acetylcholine receptor in newly formed neuromuscular synapses.  Nature . 1978;  271 366
• 15 Frenk E, Jansen J KS, Lomo T, Westgaard R H. The interaction between foreign and original motor nerves innervating the soleus muscle of rats.  J Physiol . 1975;  247 725
• 16 Lomo T, Slater C R. Acethylcholine sensitivity of developing junctions in adult rat soleus muscle.  J Physiol . 1980;  303 173
• 17 Meals R A, Nelissen R H H G. The origin and meaning of ``neurotization''.  J Hand Surgery . 1995;  20A 144-146
• 18 Elsberg C A. Experiments on motor nerve regeneration and the direct neurotization of paralyzed muscles by their own and by foreign nerves.  Science . 1917;  45 318-320
• 19 Erlacher P. Direct and muscular neurotization of paralyzed muscles.  Am J Orthop Surg . 1915;  13 22-32
• 20 Wohlfart G. Collateral regeneration in partially denervated muscles.  Neurology . 1958;  8 175-180
• 21 Gwyn D G, Aitken J T. The formation of new motor end-plates in mammalian skeletal muscle.  J Anat . 1966;  100 111-126
• 22 Brunelli G, Monini L, Antonucci A, Maraldi N. Neurotizzazione in zona aneurle di muscoli denervati.  Il Policlinico . 1976;  83 611
• 23 Brunelli G A. Direct muscular neurotization. In: Gelberman RH (ed): Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction, vol I Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co. 1991: 783-792
• 24 Payne Jr H S, Brushart T M. Neurotization of the rat soleus muscle: a quantitative analysis of reinnervation.  J Hand Surg . 1997;  22A 640-643
• 25 Seckel B R. Invited Discussion of ``Experimental comparison of muscle contractility after three methods of reinnervation''.  Ann Plast Surg . 1994;  33 170
• 26 Duchen L W, Tonge D A. The effects of implantation of an extra nerve on axonal sprouting usually induced by botulinum toxin in skeletal muscle of the mouse.  J Anat . 1977;  124 205-206
• 27 Leong J, Hayes A, Austin L, Morrison W. Muscle protection following motor nerve repair in combination with leukemia inhibitory factor.  J Hand Surg . 1999;  24A 37-45
• 28 Zheng H, Zhou S, Chen S. An experimental comparison of different kinds of laryngeal muscle reinnervation.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1998;  119 540-547
• 29 Aminoff M. Clinical electromyography. In: Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology New York: Churchill Livingstone 1992: 249-280
• 30 Wilgis E FS, Brushart T M. Nerve repair and grafting. In: Green DP, ed. Operative Hand Surgery, 3rd Ed., vol 2 NY: Churchill Livingston Inc. 1993: 1315-1340
• 31 Edds M WJ. Collateral nerve regeneration.  Quart Rev Biol . 1953;  28 260
• 32 Slack J R, Hopkins W G, Williams M N. Nerve sheaths and motoneuron collateral sprouting.  Nature . 1979;  282 506
• 33 Shanes A M. Effects of sheath removal on bullfrog nerve.  J Cell Comp Physiol . 1953;  41 305
• 34 Hall S M. Regeneration in the peripheral nervous system.  Neuropathol App Neurobiol . 1989;  15 513
• 35 Gutmann E, Sanders F K. Recovery of fiber numbers and diameters in the regeneration of peripheral nerves.  J Physiol . 1943;  101 489
• 36 Cheng N, Zhang Y L, Zhang F X, Li X X. Histological and histochemical observation on orthotopic muscle transplantation after reinnervation.  Acta Acad Med Shangai . 1987;  14 64
• 37 Harii K. Microneurovascular free muscle transplantation for reanimation of facial paralysis.  Clin Plast Surg . 1979;  6 361
• 38 Ikuta Y, Kubo T, Tsuge K. Free muscle transplantation by microsurgical technique to treat severe Volkmann's contracture.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1976;  58 407
• 39 O'Brien Mc C B, Franklin J D, Morrison W A. Cross-facial nerve grafts and microneurovascular free muscle transfer for long established facial plasy.  Br J Plast Surg . 1980;  33 202
• 40 Schenk R R. Rectus femoris muscle and composite skin transplantation by microneurovascular anastomoses for avulsion of forearm muscles: a case report.  J Hand Surg . 1978;  3 60