Endoscopy 2024; 56(S 02): S74
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782847
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2024
Oral presentation
Is EUS the new standard of care for the management of gastric outlet obstruction? 26/04/2024, 10:00 – 11:00 Room 10

EUS-Choledochoduodenostomy versus Hepaticogastrostomy combined with EUS-Gastroenterostomy in malignant double obstruction (CABRIOLET_Pro): a prospective comparative study

G. Vanella
1   Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
2   Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
,
R. Leone
1   Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
,
G. Dell'anna
2   Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
1   Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
,
M. Reni
3   Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
1   Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
,
L. Aldrighetti
4   Hepato-biliary Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
1   Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
,
M. Falconi
5   Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
1   Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
,
G. Capurso
1   Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
2   Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
,
P. Arcidiacono
2   Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
1   Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
› Institutsangaben
 

Aims Combined Biliary (BO) and Gastric Outlet Obstruction (GOO) represent a challenging clinical scenario. Previous retrospective experiences have demonstrated higher risk of Dysfunction-Free survival (DFS) of EUS-guided Choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) versus EUS-Hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) in this scenario, but no prospective evidence is available.

Methods All consecutive patients treated for double obstruction between 2021-2023 were eligible for inclusion upon receiving EUS-guided Gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) for GOO and either EUS-CDS or EUS-HGS for BO according to endoscopist preference. DFS prospective surveillance started from the day the 2 procedures coexisted. Efficacy and safety were evaluated, with biliary dysfunctions as primary outcome and DFS using Kaplan-Meier estimates (with log-rank test) as primary measure.

Results Twenty patients (75% with pancreatic cancer, 50% with metastatic disease) with EUS-GE were included (7 EUS-CDS and 13 EUS-HGS). No significant difference was detected at baseline. Technical success was 100% in both groups. EUS-CDS versus EUS-HGS showed similar clinical success (100% vs. 92.3%, p=0.5), a higher rate of post-procedural adverse events (42.9% vs. 7.7%, p=0.067, mostly related to severe/fatal cholangitis in the EUS-CDS group) and a higher rate of biliary dysfunctions during follow-up (57.1% vs. 16.7%, p=0.074).

DFS was significantly shorter in the EUS-CDS group (39 [12-66] vs. 267 [192-344] days, p=0.0043), with a 30-days probability of DFS of 53.6% vs. 100%, HR=7.4 [1.1-52.3].

Conclusions In this prospective comparison of patients with malignant double obstruction undergoing EUS-GE, treating jaundice with EUS-CDS versus EUS-HGS resulted in reduced probability of survival without biliary events, with detection of severe/fatal cholangitis.

NCT04813055



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. April 2024

© 2024. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany