PDF herunterladen
J Knee Surg 2024; 37(08): 577-585
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772222
Special Focus Section

Objective Clinical Measurement Tools for Functional Evaluation of the Surgical Patient

Jacob Thomas 
1   College of Health Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Jamie B. Hall
2   Department of Physical Therapy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Rose Schauffler
3   Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Trent M. Guess
2   Department of Physical Therapy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Following knee surgery, clinicians have traditionally used visually rated or time-based assessments of lower extremity movement quality to measure surgical outcomes, plan rehabilitation interventions, and measure success. These methods of assessment are prone to error and do not fully capture a patient's inefficient movement patterns post surgery. Further, currently available systems which objectively measure kinematics during these tasks are expensive and unidimensional. For these reasons, recent research has called for the development of objective and low-cost precision rehabilitation tools to improve clinical measurement of movement tasks. The purpose of this article is to highlight two such tools and their applications to knee surgery. The systems highlighted within this article are the Mizzou Point-of-Care Assessment System (MPASS) and the Mizzou Knee Arthrometer Testing System (MKATS). MPASS has demonstrated high levels of agreement with the gold-standard Vicon system in measuring kinematics during sit-to-stand (R > 0.71), lateral step-down (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.55, apart from ankle flexion), and drop vertical jump tasks (ICC > 0.62), as well as gait (R > 0.87). MKATS has been used to quantify differences in tibiofemoral motion between groups during lateral step-down, step-up-and-over, and step-up/step-down tasks. Objective measurement of clinical tasks using portable and inexpensive instruments, such as the MPASS and MKATS, can help clinicians identify inefficient movement patterns and asymmetries which may damage and wear down supporting structures within the knee and throughout the kinetic chain causing pain and discomfort. Identifying these issues can help clinicians to plan interventions and measure their progress at a lower cost than currently available systems. The MPASS and MKATS are useful tools which have many applications to knee surgery.

Keywords

precision rehabilitation - biomechanics - measurement - surgical outcomes


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 23. Dezember 2022

Angenommen: 15. Juli 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. August 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Glattke KE, Tummala SV, Goldberg B, Menzer H, Chhabra A. There is substantial variation in rehabilitation protocols following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a survey of 46 American orthopaedic surgeons. Arthroscopy 2023; 39 (03) 578-589.e20
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Balaghi L, King E, Tetreault L, Falvey E. The relationship of athlete factors and patient reported outcomes on return to play 1-year post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Undergraduate Res Nat Clin Sci Technol J 2021; 5: 1-8
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Reinke EK, Spindler KP, Lorring D. et al. Hop tests correlate with IKDC and KOOS at minimum of 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (11) 1806-1816
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Delgado-García G, Vanrenterghem J, Ruiz-Malagón EJ, Molina-García P, Courel-Ibáñez J, Soto-Hermoso VM. IMU gyroscopes are a valid alternative to 3D optical motion capture system for angular kinematics analysis in tennis. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part P, Sports Eng Technol 2021; 235 (01) 3-12
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Reliability of landing 3D motion analysis: implications for longitudinal analyses. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39 (11) 2021-2028
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Chauhan SS. Kinematic and kinetic gait analysis of bilateral knee osteoarthritis and its effects on ankle and hip gait mechanics. Evergreen 2020; 7 (03) 359-365
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Muench LN, Berthold DP, Archambault S. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using cortical or anchor fixation with suture tape augmentation vs ACL reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical analysis. Knee 2022; 34: 76-88
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Müller S, Bühl L, Nüesch C, Pagenstert G, Mündermann A, Egloff C. RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional-biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls-experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study. BMJ Open 2022; 12 (02) e054709
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Rashid U, Barbado D, Olsen S. et al. Validity and reliability of a smartphone app for gait and balance assessment. Sensors (Basel) 2021; 22 (01) 124
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Cotton RJ, Segal Rick RL, Seamon BA. et al. Precision rehabilitation: optimizing function, adding value to health care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 103 (09) 1883-1884
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 O'Halloran PJ, Kontos AP, Collins MW. Concussion and sport: progress is evident. Sports Med 2022; 52 (11) 2803-2805
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Benoit DL, Ramsey DK, Lamontagne M, Xu L, Wretenberg P, Renström P. Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture 2006; 24 (02) 152-164
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Camomilla V, Dumas R, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis: the soft tissue artefact issue. J Biomech 2017; 62: 1-4
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kainz H, Graham D, Edwards J. et al. Reliability of four models for clinical gait analysis. Gait Posture 2017; 54: 325-331
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Schauffler R. Methods for Improved Kinematic Measurements of the Lower Extremities. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri–Columbia; 2022
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hall JB, Guess TM. The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on tibiofemoral motion during step-up and step-down in healthy adults. Prosthet Orthot Int 2022; 46 (02) 148-154
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ness BM, Zimney K, Schweinle WE, Cleland JA. Dual-task assessment implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2020; 15 (06) 840-855
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Thomas J, Weiss S, Bliss R, Guess T. Serial subtraction alters lateral step-down tibiofemoral kinematics in healthy adults. Int J Sports Med 2023; 44 (04) 286-291
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Guess TM, Bliss R, Hall JB, Kiselica AM. Comparison of Azure Kinect overground gait spatiotemporal parameters to marker based optical motion capture. Gait Posture 2022; 96: 130-136
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Thomas J, Hall JB, Bliss R, Guess TM. Comparison of Azure Kinect and optical retroreflective motion capture for kinematic and spatiotemporal evaluation of the sit-to-stand test. Gait Posture 2022; 94: 153-159
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Thomas J, Hall JB, Guess TM. Comparative accuracy of the Azure Kinect in kinematic measurement of common dynamic lower-body clinical assessments. Available at SSRN 4169494
    PubMed
  • 22 Hausdorff JM. Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: common and distinct behavior among stride length, gait variability, and fractal-like scaling. Chaos 2009; 19 (02) 026113
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Lyle MA, Jensen JC, Hunnicutt JL. et al. Associations of strength and spatiotemporal gait variables with knee loading during gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train 2022; 57 (02) 158-164
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Verghese J, Wang C, Lipton RB, Holtzer R, Xue X. Quantitative gait dysfunction and risk of cognitive decline and dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78 (09) 929-935
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Wang J, Siddicky SF, Oliver TE, Dohm MP, Barnes CL, Mannen EM. Biomechanical changes following knee arthroplasty during sit-to-stand transfers: systematic review. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (10) 2494-2501
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Delahunt E, Sweeney L, Chawke M. et al. Lower limb kinematic alterations during drop vertical jumps in female athletes who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res 2012; 30 (01) 72-78
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Norcross MF, Halverson SD, Hawkey TJ, Blackburn JT, Padua DA. Evaluation of the lateral step-down test as a clinical assessment of hip musculature strength. Athl Train Sports Health Care 2009; 1 (06) 272-278
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Uhlár Á, Ambrus M, Kékesi M. et al. Kinect azure–based accurate measurement of dynamic valgus position of the knee—a corrigible predisposing factor of osteoarthritis. Appl Sci (Basel) 2021; 11 (12) 5536
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Bahureksa L, Najafi B, Saleh A. et al. The impact of mild cognitive impairment on gait and balance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using instrumented assessment. Gerontology 2017; 63 (01) 67-83
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Buckley TA, Oldham JR, Caccese JB. Postural control deficits identify lingering post-concussion neurological deficits. J Sport Health Sci 2016; 5 (01) 61-69
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Howell DR, Lynall RC, Buckley TA, Herman DC. Neuromuscular control deficits and the risk of subsequent injury after a concussion: a scoping review. Sports Med 2018; 48 (05) 1097-1115
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kaur M, Ribeiro DC, Webster KE, Sole G. Knee biomechanics while navigating steps in participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, between 2 and 10 years following surgery. Phys Ther Sport 2020; 46: 70-76
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Angerame MR, Holst DC, Jennings JM, Komistek RD, Dennis DA. Total knee arthroplasty kinematics. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (10) 2502-2510
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kaplan Y, Witvrouw E. When is it safe to return to sport after ACL reconstruction? reviewing the criteria. Sports Health 2019; 11 (04) 301-305
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar