The Effect of Prosthesis Type on Intraoperative Soft-Tissue Balance and Clinical Outcomes in Modified Kinematically Aligned Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Introduction Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) has gained interest for achieving more favorable clinical outcomes than mechanically aligned TKA. One of the advantages of KA-TKA is reported to be an easy acquisition of intraoperative soft-tissue balance without excessive medial release for varus osteoarthritis. However, we hypothesized that the prosthesis type affects intraoperative soft-tissue balance even in the KA-TKA. The present study aimed to compare intraoperative soft-tissue balance and clinical outcomes of KA-TKAs using single-radius (SR) or multiradius (MR) prostheses.

Materials and Methods Consecutive 70 cruciate-retaining modified KA-TKAs (31 SR and 39 MR) were performed in patients with varus-type osteoarthritis using a navigation system. Intraoperative soft-tissue balance including joint component gap and varus/valgus balance was measured with femoral component placement and patellofemoral joint reduction throughout the range of motion using offset-type tensor and compared between the two groups. Two years postoperatively, the range of motion and 2011 Knee Society Scores were compared between the two groups.

Results and Conclusion Joint component gaps showed no significant differences between the two groups from 0 to 30 degrees of flexion. However, during 60 to 120 degrees of flexion, joint component gaps of SR group showed significantly larger values than those of MR group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in varus/valgus balance throughout the range of motion between the two groups. The postoperative clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Interpretation Despite no difference in clinical outcomes, joint component gap showed different patterns due to the prosthesis type in modified KA-TKAs.

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty - soft-tissue balance - kinematic alignment - single radius - multiradius

Publication History

Received: 06 September 2021

Accepted: 18 March 2022

Article published online:
11 July 2022

• References

• 1 Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (392) 315-318
• 2 Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (17) 1588-1596
• 3 Leopold SS. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: No Difference in 2-year Functional Outcomes Using Kinematic versus Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (01) 9-20
• 4 Schiraldi M, Bonzanini G, Chirillo D, de Tullio V. Mechanical and kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4 (07) 130
• 5 Howell SM, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik KT, Hull ML. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2271-2280
• 6 Courtney PM, Lee GC. Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (06) 2028-2032.e1
• 7 Yoon JR, Han SB, Jee MK, Shin YS. Comparison of kinematic and mechanical alignment techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (39) e8157
• 8 Lee YS, Howell SM, Won YY. et al. Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (11) 3467-3479
• 9 Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B [phone]
• 10 Dossett HG, Swartz GJ, Estrada NA, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (02) e160-e169
• 11 Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (03) 1000-1007
• 12 Howell SM, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik K, Ghaly LR, Hull ML. Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (11) 2117-2124
• 13 Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (01) 45-53
• 14 Vanlommel L, Vanlommel J, Claes S, Bellemans J. Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2325-2330
• 15 Howell MS, Hull LM. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. 5th ed. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2012: 1255-1268 . Ch. 121
• 16 Blakeney W, Beaulieu Y, Kiss MO, Rivière C, Vendittoli PA. Less gap imbalance with restricted kinematic alignment than with mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: simulations on 3-D bone models created from CT-scans. Acta Orthop 2019; 90 (06) 602-609
• 17 MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Chen DB. et al. Restoring the constitutional alignment with a restrictive kinematic protocol improves quantitative soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B [phone]
• 18 Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ishida K. et al. Intraoperative soft tissue balance/kinematics and clinical evaluation of modified kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2020; 33 (08) 777-784
• 19 Tsubosaka M, Kamenaga T, Kuroda Y. et al. Accelerometer-based portable navigation system is useful for tibial bone cutting in modified kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2021; 34 (08) 870-876
• 20 Matsumoto T, Hashimura M, Takayama K. et al. A radiographic analysis of alignment of the lower extremities–initiation and progression of varus-type knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23 (02) 217-223
• 21 Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Muratsu H, Matsushita T, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. Semimembranosus release reduces tibial internal rotation and flexion angle in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (09) 1537-1541
• 22 Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C. Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (436) 172-176
• 23 Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Kubo S, Muratsu H, Mizuno K, Kurosaka M. The intra-operative joint gap in cruciate-retaining compared with posterior-stabilised total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (04) 475-480
• 24 Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Kubo S, Matsushita T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R. Soft tissue tension in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (05) 788-795
• 25 Miura M, Hagiwara S, Nakamura J, Wako Y, Kawarai Y, Ohtori S. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of computed tomography-based three-dimensional preoperative planning for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (05) 1572-1578
• 26 Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G. Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (05) 620-628
• 27 Macri EM, d'Entremont AG, Crossley KM. et al. Alignment differs between patellofemoral osteoarthritis cases and matched controls: an upright 3D MRI study. J Orthop Res 2019; 37 (03) 640-648
• 28 Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new knee society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (01) 3-19
• 29 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39 (02) 175-191
• 30 Eckhoff D, Hogan C, DiMatteo L, Robinson M, Bach J. Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 461 (461) 238-244
• 31 Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ishida K, Hayashi S, Hashimoto S, Kuroda R. Radiological and clinical comparison of kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B [phone]
• 32 Kim J, Min KD, Lee BI. et al. Comparison of functional outcomes between single-radius and multi-radius femoral components in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Relat Res 2020; 32 (01) 52