Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(06): 756-763
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744510
Original Article

Gestational Age at Delivery and Neonatal Outcomes among Infants with Gastroschisis in the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium (CHNC)

Stefanie Riddle 
1   Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Krishna Acharya
2   Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
,
Nidhi Agarwal
3   Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
,
Irfan Ahmad
4   Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital Orange County, Orange, California
,
Ellen Bendel-Stenzel
5   Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Jennifer Shepherd
6   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Fetal and Neonatal Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
,
Sadie Williams
7   AdventHealth for Children, Altamonte Springs, Florida
,
Isabella Zaniletti
8   Children's Hospitals Association, Lenexa, Kansas
,
Elizabeth Jacobson
9   Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
,
the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium's Gastroschisis Focus Group › Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The effect of gestational age (GA) on gastroschisis outcomes is unclear and delivery timing varies in practice. We aimed to correlate clinical outcomes of infants with gastroschisis and GA at delivery in the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium (CHNC).

Study Design This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of infants with gastroschisis admitted to CHNC neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) from 2010 to 2016. Patients were categorized by GA: 32 to 346/7, 35 to 366/7, and ≥37 weeks. Respiratory and feeding interventions, mortality, length of stay, and common complications were compared.

Results In 2021 for patients with gastroschisis, median GA at delivery was 36.3 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 35.1, 37.3) and mean birth weight 2,425 g (IQR 2,100, 2,766). Overall mortality was low and there was no difference across GA groups. Infants <35 weeks' gestation had the greatest need for respiratory and feeding interventions. Complications such as medical necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), cholestasis, and central line-associated blood stream infection were less common in infants ≥37 weeks. Feeding initiation and full feeds were earliest in term infants, compared with infants between 35 and 366/7 weeks, and longest in infants <35 weeks. Prematurity had a significant negative association with breast milk exposure. Enteral feeding tube support at discharge increased with prematurity. Compared with term, infants born between 35 and 366/7 weeks' gestation had a higher incidence of medical NEC and lower exposure to mother's milk at discharge but the need for respiratory interventions or tube feeding at discharge was similar.

Conclusion Premature infants with gastroschisis had more neonatal complications including respiratory interventions, longer NICU stay, longer time to full enteral feeds, and higher need for tube feeds at discharge as compared with those delivered at term. Differences were greatest for those <35 weeks GA. While overall mortality remains low, these results provide additional information about GA at birth in gastroschisis, with no evidence of benefit from preterm delivery.

Key Points

  • Respiratory support was greatest for those with <35 weeks gestation.

  • NEC and cholestasis increase with prematurity.

  • Term infants have better feeding outcomes.

Keywords

gastroschisis - prematurity - gestational age - Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium

Note

The site sponsors/contributors for the CHND include:

1. Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA (A.P.)

2. Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite (G.S.)

3. Children's Hospital of Alabama, Birmingham, AL (C.C.)

4. Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN (A.T.)

5. Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA (A.H. and T.H.)

6. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL (K.M and G.F.)

7. Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH (B.H.)

8. Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (K.R.)

9. Children's Medical Center, Dallas, TX (R.S.)

10. Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO (T.G.)

11. Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI (G.N.)

12. Cook Children's Health Care System, Fort Worth, TX (A.C. and Y.J.)

13. Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX (G.S.)

14. Riley Children's Hospital, Indianapolis, IN (W.E.)

15. Children's Mercy Hospitals & Clinics, Kansas City, MO (E.P.)

16. Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR (R.L. and B.R.)

17. Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (R.C.)

18. American Family Children's Hospital, Madison, WI (J.L.)

19. Children's Hospital & Research Center Oakland, Oakland, CA (P.J.)

20. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA (J.E., M.P., and D.M.)

21. St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA (S.T.)

22. Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA (B.B.)

23. St. Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis, MO (R.R. and A.M.)

24. All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL (V.M.)

25. Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA (M.S. and L.M.)

26. Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC (B.S.)

27. AI DuPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE (K.S.)

28. Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT (C.Y.L.)

29. Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (M.U. and A.D.)

30. Children's Hospital of Omaha (L.W. and N.B.)

31. Florida Hospital for Children (R.W.)

32. Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA (E.J.-M. and R.D.)

33. Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON (K.-S.L.)

34. Children's Hospital Orange County, Los Angeles, CA (M.M.)




Publication History

Received: 05 August 2021

Accepted: 15 February 2022

Article published online:
12 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Langer JC, Longaker MT, Crombleholme TM. et al. Etiology of intestinal damage in gastroschisis. I: effects of amniotic fluid exposure and bowel constriction in a fetal lamb model. J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24 (10) 992-997
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Guibourdenche J, Berrebi D, Vuillard E. et al. Biochemical investigations of bowel inflammation in gastroschisis. Pediatr Res 2006; 60 (05) 565-568
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Stewart DL, Barfield WD. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Updates on an at-risk population: late-preterm and early-term infants. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (05) e20192760
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Engle WA, Tomashek KM, Wallman C. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. “Late-preterm” infants: a population at risk. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (06) 1390-1401
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Carnaghan H, Baud D, Lapidus-Krol E. et al. Effect of gestational age at birth on neonatal outcomes in gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51 (05) 734-738
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Snyder CW, Biggio JR, Brinson P. et al. Effects of multidisciplinary prenatal care and delivery mode on gastroschisis outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46 (01) 86-89
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Ergün O, Barksdale E, Ergün FS. et al. The timing of delivery of infants with gastroschisis influences outcome. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (02) 424-428
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Palatnik A, Loichinger M, Wagner A, Peterson E. The association between gestational age at delivery, closure type and perinatal outcomes in neonates with isolated gastroschisis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33 (08) 1393-1399
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Cain MA, Salemi JL, Paul Tanner J. et al. Perinatal outcomes and hospital costs in gastroschisis based on gestational age at delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (03) 543-550
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Overcash RT, DeUgarte DA, Stephenson ML. et al; University of California Fetal Consortium*. Factors associated with gastroschisis outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (03) 551-557
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Shamshirsaz AA, Lee TC, Hair AB. et al. Elective delivery at 34 weeks vs routine obstetric care in fetal gastroschisis: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55 (01) 15-19
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Logghe HL, Mason GC, Thornton JG, Stringer MD. A randomized controlled trial of elective preterm delivery of fetuses with gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (11) 1726-1731
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Wagner A. Gastroschisis Outcomes of Delivery (GOOD) Study. Accessed February 14, 2021, at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02774746
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Murthy K, Dykes FD, Padula MA. et al. The Children's Hospitals Neonatal Database: an overview of patient complexity, outcomes and variation in care. J Perinatol 2014; 34 (08) 582-586
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Sparks TN, Shaffer BL, Page J, Caughey AB. Gastroschisis: mortality risks with each additional week of expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (01) 66.e1-66.e7
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Gulack BC, Laughon MM, Clark RH. et al. Enteral feeding with human milk decreases time to discharge in infants following gastroschisis repair. J Pediatr 2016; 170: 85-89
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Kohler Sr JA, Perkins AM, Bass WT. Human milk versus formula after gastroschisis repair: effects on time to full feeds and time to discharge. J Perinatol 2013; 33 (08) 627-630
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Gupta R, Cabacungan ET. Outcome of neonates with gastroschisis at different gestational ages using a national database. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53 (04) 661-665
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Youssef F, Cheong LH, Emil S. Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network (CAPSNet). Gastroschisis outcomes in North America: a comparison of Canada and the United States. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51 (06) 891-895
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Landisch RM, Yin Z, Christensen M, Szabo A, Wagner AJ. Outcomes of gastroschisis early delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52 (12) 1962-1971
    Google Scholar