Download PDF
Sprache · Stimme · Gehör 2016; 40(04): 188-191
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-113761
Schwerpunktthema
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die Messung der stimmlichen Belastung und Belastbarkeit

Measurement of Vocal Loading and Vocal Loading Capacity
M. Echternach
1   Freiburger Institut für Musikermedizin, Universitätsklinik Freiburg i.Br.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 December 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Belastung und die Belastbarkeit der Stimme sind wichtige Aspekte der stimmlichen Leistungsfähigkeit. Für die Evaluation der Belastbarkeit haben sich im klinischen Kontext Stimmbelastungstests und für die Messung der Belastung die Dosimetrie mittels Accelerometer etabliert. Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit beschreibt die Durchführung und Bewertungsmöglichkeiten dieser Anwendungen.

Abstract

Both vocal loading capacity and vocal loading are important parameters in the assessment of vocal performance. For the evaluation of vocal loading capacity and measurements of vocal loading, vocal loading tests and dosimetry using accelerometers, respectively have been established in the clinical context. This review describes the procedure and potential for interpretation of both of these applications.

Schlüsselwörter

Stimmbelastung - Stimmbelastbarkeit - Accelerometer - Stimmbelastungstests

Key words

vocal loading - vocal loading capacity - accelerometer - vocal loading tests
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2001; 258: 77-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wendler J, Seidner W. Klinik. In: Wendler J, Seidner W, Eysholdt U. (Hrsg.) Lehrbuch der Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2005: 140
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Mehta DD, Van Stan JH, Hillman RE. Relationships between vocal function measures derived from an acoustic microphone and a subglottal neck-surface accelerometer. IEEE/ACM Transact Audio, Speech Lang Proc 2016; 24: 659-668
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Van Stan JH, Mehta DD, Zeitels SM et al. Average Ambulatory Measures of Sound Pressure Level, Fundamental Frequency, and Vocal Dose Do Not Differ Between Adult Females With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Control Subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2015; 124: 864-874
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Echternach M, Nusseck M, Dippold S et al. Fundamental frequency, sound pressure level and vocal dose of a vocal loading test in comparison to a real teaching situation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 271: 3263-3268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Svec JG, Titze IR, Popolo PS. Estimation of sound pressure levels of voiced speech from skin vibration of the neck. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 1386-1394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Titze IR, Svec JG, Popolo PS. Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46: 919-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cheyne HA, Hanson HM, Genereux RP et al. Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46: 1457-1467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sodersten M, Salomao GL, McAllister A et al. Natural Voice Use in Patients With Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Speakers Based on 2 Days Voice Accumulator Information From a Database. J Voice 2015; 29: 646.e1-e9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lien YA, Stepp CE. Comparison of voice relative fundamental frequency estimates derived from an accelerometer signal and low-pass filtered and unprocessed microphone signals. J Acoust Soc Am 2014; 135: 2977-2985
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lombard E. Le signe de l’élévation de la voix. Annales des maladies de l’oreille, du larynx, du nez et du pharynx 1911; 37: 101-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Titze IR, Hunter EJ. Comparison of Vocal Vibration-Dose Measures for Potential-Damage Risk Criteria. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015; 58: 1425-1439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hunter EJ. Teacher response to ambulatory monitoring of voice. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2012; 37: 133-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lindstrom F, Waye KP, Sodersten M et al. Observations of the relationship between noise exposure and preschool teacher voice usage in day-care center environments. J Voice 2011; 25: 166-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gaskill CS, O’Brien SG, Tinter SR. The effect of voice amplification on occupational vocal dose in elementary school teachers. J Voice 2012; 26: 667.e619-627
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Llico AF, Zanartu M, Gonzalez AJ et al. Real-time estimation of aerodynamic features for ambulatory voice biofeedback. J Acoust Soc Am 2015; 138: EL14-EL19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Echternach M, Richter B, Traser L et al. Veränderung der stimmlichen Leistungsfähigkeit durch verschiedene Stimmbelastungstests. Laryngorhinootologie 2013; 92: 34-40
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Niebudek-Bogusz E, Kotylo P, Politanski P et al. Acoustic analysis with vocal loading test in occupational voice disorders: outcomes before and after voice therapy. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2008; 21: 301-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kramer H, Perez Alvarez JC, Hacki T. Stimmleistungscharakterisierende Kurventypen im Stimmbelastungstest. In: Gross M. (Hrsg.) Aktuelle phoniatrisch-pädaudiologische Aspekte. Heidelberg: Median-Verlag; 1999: 75-79
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Seidner W. Messung der stimmlichen Belastbarkeit. In: Seidner W, Nawka T. (Hrsg.) Handreichungen zur Stimmdiagnostik: Aus der Praxis für die Praxis. Berlin: XION GmbH; 2012: 91-105
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Laukkanen AM, Jarvinen K, Artkoski M et al. Changes in voice and subjective sensations during a 45-min vocal loading test in female subjects with vocal training. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2004; 56: 335-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vintturi J, Alku P, Sala E et al. Loading-related subjective symptoms during a vocal loading test with special reference to gender and some ergonomic factors. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2003; 55: 55-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Schneider B, Bigenzahn W. Stimmbelastungstest zur Überprüfung der stimmlichen Belastbarkeit. In: Schneider B, Bigenzahn W. (Hrsg.) Stimmdiagnostik. Wien: Springer; 2007: 105-109
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Pabst F, Seiler R, Hacki T. Zur Beurteilung der Sprechstimmleistungen nach Stimmbelastungstes mittels Stimmfeldmessung. In: Gross M. ed. Aktuelle phoniatrisch-pädaudiologische Aspekte. Heidelberg: Median-Verlag; 1998: 73-75
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Hanschmann H, Wlodarz M, Berger R. Standardisierte Stimmdiagnostik – Erste Erfahrungen mit einem computergestützen Stimmbelastungstest. Laryngorhinootologie 2010; 89: 544-548
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hanschmann H, Gaipl C, Berger R. Preliminary results of a computer-assisted vocal load test with 10-min test duration. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268: 309-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kelchner LN, Toner MM, Lee L. Effects of prolonged loud reading on normal adolescent male voices. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006; 37: 96-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Chang A, Karnell MP. Perceived phonatory effort and phonation threshold pressure across a prolonged voice loading task: a study of vocal fatigue. J Voice 2004; 18: 454-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Richter B, Nusseck M, Spahn C et al. Effectiveness of a Voice Training Program for Student Teachers on Vocal Health. J Voice 2016; 30: 452-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Richter B, Echternach M. Stimmdiagnostik und -therapie bei Angehörigen stimmintensiver Berufe. HNO 2010; 58: 389-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar