Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(05): 625-631
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725162
Original Research

The Evidence Base for the Benefits of Functional Septorhinoplasty and its Future Post COVID-19

1   Department of Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
,
Alfonso Luca Pendolino
1   Department of Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
2   Ear Institute, University College London, United Kingdom
,
Deborah Auer
3   Department of Otolaryngology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Sadie Khwaja
4   Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
,
Premjit S. Randhawa
1   Department of Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
,
Peter J. Andrews
1   Department of Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
2   Ear Institute, University College London, United Kingdom
,
Hesham A. Saleh
3   Department of Otolaryngology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Ever since the introduction of the concept of Procedures of Limited Clinical Value (PoLCV), procedures such as functional septorhinoplasty have been subject to additional funding restrictions within the British National Health Service. Recent publications have suggested that 10% of Clinical Commissioning Groups in the United Kingdom no longer fund septorhinoplasty surgery irrespective of the indications, including congenital malformations or post-trauma, and despite the strong evidence available in the literature in treating a range of health conditions. Thus, inequity exists across the country. At present functional septorhinoplasty surgery is frequently but incorrectly grouped together with aesthetic rhinoplasty, both of which are deemed to be cosmetic interventions. Moreover, as we exit the peak of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, procedures deemed to be of lower clinical priority will potentially be at risk throughout Europe. The purpose of this review is twofold; the first is to put forward the evidence to commissioners in favor of functional septorhinoplasty surgery on patient well-being and mental health; the second is to demonstrate why functional septorhinoplasty surgery is a distinct procedure from aesthetic rhinoplasty and why it ought not to be classified as a procedure of limited clinical value.

Authors' Contributions

S.N.U. contributed toward the concept of paper, drafting of manuscript. A.L.P. contributed toward the literature review and review of manuscript. D.A. edited section on psychology in functional septorhinoplasty. S.K. edited sections on why nasal obstruction needs treating and what are the health benefits of functional septorhinoplasty. P.S.R. prepared the concept of paper and did the final manuscript review. P.J.A. edited the section on methods used to assess nasal obstruction. H.A.S. did the supervision and drafting of manuscript.




Publication History

Article published online:
06 March 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Audit Commission. Reducing spending on low clinical value treatments. Accessed November 30, 2020 at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150421134146/http://archive.audit-commission.gov.uk/auditcommission/subwebs/publications/studies/studyPDF/3683.pdf
  • 2 Unadkat S, Pendolino AL, Joshi A. et al. A national survey of functional septorhinoplasty surgery performed in the United Kingdom: a clinician end-user questionnaire to assess current practice and help inform future practice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277 (02) 475-482
  • 3 Ross EE, Anari S. Clinical commissioning group criteria for rhinoplasty and septorhinoplasty in England: survey of current guidance. J Laryngol Otol 2018; 132 (07) 591-595
  • 4 Ranney ML, Griffeth V, Jha AK. Critical supply shortages—the need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (18) e41
  • 5 Iacobucci G. Covid-19: all non-urgent elective surgery is suspended for at least three months in England. BMJ 2020; 368: m1106
  • 6 CovidSurg Collaborative. Nepogodiev D, Bhangu A. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans. Br J Surg 2020; 107 (11) 1440-1449
  • 7 Royal College of Surgeons of England. Recovery of surgical services during and after COVID-19. Accessed June 1, 2020 at: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/coronavirus/recovery-of-surgical-services/
  • 8 Unadkat SN, Andrews PJ, Bertossi D. et al. Recovery of elective facial plastic surgery in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 era: recommendations from the European academy of facial plastic surgery task force. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020; 22 (04) 233-237
  • 9 Bartlett DL, Howe JR, Chang G. et al; Society of Surgical Oncology. Management of cancer surgery cases during the COVID-19 pandemic: considerations. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (06) 1717-1720
  • 10 Al-Shamsi HO, Alhazzani W, Alhuraiji A. et al. A practical approach to the management of cancer patients during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: an international collaborative group. Oncologist 2020; 25 (06) e936-e945
  • 11 Bulut OC, Wallner F, Oladokun D. et al. Long-term quality of life changes after primary septorhinoplasty. Qual Life Res 2018; 27 (04) 987-991
  • 12 Rhee JS, Poetker DM, Smith TL, Bustillo A, Burzynski M, Davis RE. Nasal valve surgery improves disease-specific quality of life. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (03) 437-440
  • 13 Samra S, Steitz JT, Hajnas N, Toriumi DM. Surgical management of nasal valve collapse. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51 (05) 929-944
  • 14 Simon P, Sidle D. Augmenting the nasal airway: beyond septoplasty. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012; 26 (04) 326-331
  • 15 Elwany S, Thabet H. Obstruction of the nasal valve. J Laryngol Otol 1996; 110 (03) 221-224
  • 16 Patel B, Virk JS, Randhawa PS, Andrews PJ. The internal nasal valve: a validated grading system and operative guide. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275 (11) 2739-2744
  • 17 van Egmond MMHT, Rovers MM, Hannink G, Hendriks CTM, van Heerbeek N. Septoplasty with or without concurrent turbinate surgery versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction in adults with a deviated septum: a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 394 (10195): 314-321
  • 18 Gupta A, Brooks D, Stager S, Lindsey WH. Surgical access to the internal nasal valve. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (02) 155-158
  • 19 Poirrier AL, Ahluwalia S, Kwame I, Chau H, Bentley M, Andrews P. External nasal valve collapse: validation of novel outcome measurement tool. Rhinology 2014; 52 (02) 127-132
  • 20 Fischer H, Gubisch W. Nasal valves—importance and surgical procedures. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (04) 266-280
  • 21 Apaydin F. Nasal valve surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (02) 179-191
  • 22 Hamilton III GS. The external nasal valve. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2017; 25 (02) 179-194
  • 23 Gubisch W. Extracorporeal septoplasty for the markedly deviated septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005; 7 (04) 218-226
  • 24 Gubisch W. Treatment of the scoliotic nose with extracorporeal septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015; 23 (01) 11-22
  • 25 Okland TS, Kandathil C, Sanan A, Rudy S, Most SP. Analysis of nasal obstruction patterns following reductive rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (01) 122-128
  • 26 Huizing EH. Incorrect terminology in nasal anatomy and surgery, suggestions for improvement. Rhinology 2003; 41 (03) 129-133
  • 27 Pendolino AL, Randhawa P, Unadkat S, Andrews PJ. Septoplasty for nasal obstruction. Lancet 2020; 395 (10223): 493
  • 28 Drake AF, Keall H, Vig PS, Krause CJ. Clinical nasal obstruction and objective respiratory mode determination. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988; 97 (4 Pt 1): 397-402
  • 29 Ogura JH. Presidential address. Fundamental understanding of nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 1977; 87 (08) 1225-1232
  • 30 Ferris Jr BG, Mead J, Opie LH. Partitioning of respiratory flow resistance in man. J Appl Physiol 1964; 19: 653-658
  • 31 O'Neil JJ. The role of the vocal cords in human respiration. Laryngoscope 1959; 69: 1494-1507
  • 32 Tanaka Y, Morikawa T, Honda Y. An assessment of nasal functions in control of breathing. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1988; 65 (04) 1520-1524
  • 33 Tanaka Y, Honda Y. Nasal obstruction as a cause of reduced PCO2 and disordered breathing during sleep. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1989; 67 (03) 970-972
  • 34 Ogura JH, Dammkoehler R, Nelson JR, Kawasaki M, Togawa K. Nasal obstruction and the mechanics of breathing. Physiologic relationships and the effects of nasal surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1966; 83 (02) 135-150
  • 35 Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Bartra J, Muñoz-Cano R. et al. Assessment of nasal obstruction: correlation between subjective and objective techniques. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2013; 41 (06) 397-401
  • 36 Poirrier AL, Ahluwalia S, Goodson A, Ellis M, Bentley M, Andrews P. Is the sino-nasal outcome test-22 a suitable evaluation for septorhinoplasty?. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (01) 76-81
  • 37 Takhar A, Stephens J, Randhawa PS, Poirrier AL, Andrews P. Validation of the sino-nasal outcome test-23 in septorhinoplasty surgery. Rhinology 2014; 52 (04) 301-304
  • 38 Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (02) 157-163
  • 39 Bulut C, Wallner F, Plinkert PK, Baumann I. Development and validation of the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology 2014; 52 (04) 315-319
  • 40 Alsarraf R. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000; 24 (03) 192-197
  • 41 Floyd EM, Ho S, Patel P, Rosenfeld RM, Gordin E. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating functional rhinoplasty outcomes with the NOSE score. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 156 (05) 809-815
  • 42 Kaditis AG, Alonso Alvarez ML, Boudewyns A. et al. Obstructive sleep disordered breathing in 2- to 18-year-old children: diagnosis and management. Eur Respir J 2016; 47 (01) 69-94
  • 43 Bradley TD, Floras JS. Obstructive sleep apnoea and its cardiovascular consequences. Lancet 2009; 373 (9657): 82-93
  • 44 Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 1993; 328 (17) 1230-1235
  • 45 Steier J, Martin A, Harris J, Jarrold I, Pugh D, Williams A. Predicted relative prevalence estimates for obstructive sleep apnoea and the associated healthcare provision across the UK. Thorax 2014; 69 (04) 390-392
  • 46 Young T, Finn L, Palta M. Chronic nasal congestion at night is a risk factor for snoring in a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161 (12) 1514-1519
  • 47 Värendh M, Andersson M, Bjørnsdottir E. et al. Nocturnal nasal obstruction is frequent and reduces sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Sleep Res 2018; 27 (04) e12631
  • 48 Kohler M, Bloch KE, Stradling JR. The role of the nose in the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnoea and snoring. Eur Respir J 2007; 30 (06) 1208-1215
  • 49 Boudewyns AN, Van de Heyning PH, De Backer WA. Site of upper airway obstruction in obstructive apnoea and influence of sleep stage. Eur Respir J 1997; 10 (11) 2566-2572
  • 50 Exar EN, Collop NA. The upper airway resistance syndrome. Chest 1999; 115 (04) 1127-1139
  • 51 Georgalas C. The role of the nose in snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea: an update. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268 (09) 1365-1373
  • 52 Li HY, Lin Y, Chen NH, Lee LA, Fang TJ, Wang PC. Improvement in quality of life after nasal surgery alone for patients with obstructive sleep apnea and nasal obstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134 (04) 429-433
  • 53 Wu J, Zhao G, Li Y. et al. Apnea-hypopnea index decreased significantly after nasal surgery for obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (05) e6008
  • 54 Verse T, Maurer JT, Pirsig W. Effect of nasal surgery on sleep-related breathing disorders. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (01) 64-68
  • 55 Nakata S, Noda A, Yasuma F. et al. Effects of nasal surgery on sleep quality in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome with nasal obstruction. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22 (01) 59-63
  • 56 Koutsourelakis I, Georgoulopoulos G, Perraki E, Vagiakis E, Roussos C, Zakynthinos SG. Randomised trial of nasal surgery for fixed nasal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J 2008; 31 (01) 110-117
  • 57 Camacho M, Riaz M, Capasso R. et al. The effect of nasal surgery on continuous positive airway pressure device use and therapeutic treatment pressures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep (Basel) 2015; 38 (02) 279-286
  • 58 Hismi A, Yu P, Locascio J, Levesque PA, Lindsay RW. the impact of nasal obstruction and functional septorhinoplasty on sleep quality. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020; 22 (06) 412-419
  • 59 Tjahjono R, Alvarado R, Kalish L. et al. Health impairment from nasal airway obstruction and changes in health utility values from septorhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21 (02) 146-151
  • 60 Stewart M, Ferguson B, Fromer L. Epidemiology and burden of nasal congestion. Int J Gen Med 2010; 3: 37-45
  • 61 Gadkaree SK, Fuller JC, Justicz NS. et al. Health utility values as an outcome measure in patients undergoing functional septorhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21 (05) 381-386
  • 62 Schmidlin M, Fritsch K, Matthews F, Thurnheer R, Senn O, Bloch KE. Utility indices in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Respiration 2010; 79 (03) 200-208
  • 63 Slobogean GP, Younger A, Apostle KL. et al. Preference-based quality of life of end-stage ankle arthritis treated with arthroplasty or arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2010; 31 (07) 563-566
  • 64 Osnes-Ringen H, Kvamme MK, Kristiansen IS. et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of elective orthopaedic surgical procedures in patients with inflammatory arthropathies. Scand J Rheumatol 2011; 40 (02) 108-115
  • 65 Sharma S, Wormald JCR, Fishman JM, Andrews P, Kotecha BT. Rhinological interventions for obstructive sleep apnoea—a systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol 2019; 133 (03) 168-176
  • 66 Economic and social costs of mental health problems. Accessed November 30, 2020 at: https://www.centreformentalhealth.org.uk/sites/default/files/2018-10/Economic_and_social_costs_2010.pdf
  • 67 Thomas S, Jenkins R, Burch T. et al. Promoting mental health and preventing mental illness in general practice. London J Prim Care (Abingdon) 2016; 8 (01) 3-9
  • 68 Sahni V. Psychological impact of facial trauma. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2018; 11 (01) 15-20
  • 69 Girotto JA, MacKenzie E, Fowler C, Redett R, Robertson B, Manson PN. Long-term physical impairment and functional outcomes after complex facial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (02) 312-327
  • 70 Phillips KM, Hoehle LP, Bergmark RW. et al. Association between nasal obstruction and risk of depression in chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 157 (01) 150-155
  • 71 Akkoca Ö, Oğuz H, Ünlü CE, Aydın E, Ozdel K, Kavuzlu A. Association between nasal obstruction symptoms and anxiety. Ear Nose Throat J 2020; 99 (07) 448-452
  • 72 Joseph J, Randhawa P, Hannan SA. et al. Body dysmorphic disorder in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery: should we be performing routine screening?. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42 (03) 508-513
  • 73 Buhlmann U, Glaesmer H, Mewes R. et al. Updates on the prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder: a population-based survey. Psychiatry Res 2010; 178 (01) 171-175
  • 74 Ercolani M, Baldaro B, Rossi N, Trombini E, Trombini G. Short-term outcome of rhinoplasty for medical or cosmetic indication. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47 (03) 277-281
  • 75 Ercolani M, Baldaro B, Rossi N, Trombini G. Five-year follow-up of cosmetic rhinoplasty. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47 (03) 283-286