Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724025
Self-Assessment Questions

This section provides a review. Mark each statement on the Answer Sheet according to the factual materials contained in this issue and the opinions of the authors.
Article One (pp. 88–100)
-
Preschool programs and classroom composition are particularly important for:
-
Children from more advantaged families.
-
Children in part-day programs.
-
Children who come from English-speaking homes.
-
Children who experience greater adversity.
-
Children without disabilities.
-
-
Which of the following statements is false?
-
There is no one factor or aspect of the preschool classroom that is the driver of children’s language development.
-
Interacting with classmates provides children opportunities to scaffold peer learning.
-
The structural and process elements of the preschool classroom predict only a small portion of children’s early school success.
-
Teachers’ creation of a high-quality environment varies as a function of their own abilities and the attributes of children in their classroom.
-
Children’s experiences in the preschool classroom do not vary greatly from child to child.
-
-
One way to ensure equitable language growth for children in preschool classrooms is to:
-
Increase the eligible age for preschool enrollment.
-
Develop training and professional development for teachers on incorporating peers in children’s learning and individualizing children’s classroom experience.
-
Reduce the percentage of older children in the classroom.
-
Place children with IEPs and children without IEPs in different classrooms.
-
Expand the class size.
-
-
What factors might explain the connection between classroom composition and children’s language outcomes?
-
Parental involvement in the preschool classroom.
-
Teachers’ instructional practices.
-
Teacher–child ratios.
-
Children’s internalizing behaviors.
-
The number of annual classroom field trips.
-
-
Why might the influence of peers on children’s language development differ between preschool and kindergarten?
-
Preschool children have more peer exposure than kindergarten children because they spend more of their classroom time in free play.
-
Kindergarten children have more peer exposure than preschool children because they spend more of their classroom time in free play.
-
Preschool classrooms environments are more structured than kindergarten classroom environments.
-
Preschool children have more advanced language and literacy skills than kindergarten children.
-
None of the above.
Article Two (pp. 101–116)
-
-
Academic language contributes to:
-
Academic achievement.
-
Reading comprehension.
-
Comprehension of teacher talk.
-
All of the above.
-
None of the above.
-
-
Academic vocabulary can be categorized into:
-
Pronouns.
-
Domain-specific words.
-
General academic words.
-
None of the above.
-
Both B and C.
-
-
Academic language includes:
-
Discourse structures.
-
Complex sentences.
-
Letter and number names.
-
Words with high frequency in children’s conversations.
-
Both A and B.
-
-
In contextualized language intervention:
-
A storybook context is required.
-
Multiple language targets are addressed in the same activity.
-
Repeated measurement is critical.
-
Language intervention is embedded in a meaningful, functional context.
-
Both B and D.
-
-
Potential benefits to contextualizing language intervention in the academic curriculum include:
-
Improved educational impact.
-
Increased student motivation.
-
Teaching of discrete language skills in isolation.
-
Both A and B.
-
All of the above.
Article Three (pp. 117–135)
-
-
Which of the following is not included as a target during Camp Dream. Speak. Live.?
-
Communication competencies.
-
Stuttering frequency or severity.
-
Attitudes toward communication.
-
Desensitization and self-disclosure.
-
Quality of peer relationships.
-
-
Significant improvements were observed postintervention for all of the following except:
-
Reactions to stuttering, as measure by the OASES.
-
Perceived ability to establish peer relationships, as measured by the PROMIS Peer Relationships scale.
-
Communication competencies, as measured by rubric developed by the National Communication Association.
-
Communication in daily situations, as measured by the OASES.
-
Attitudes about stuttering, as measured by the KiddyCAT.
-
-
Videotaped pre- and postintervention presentations from child participants were rated for communication competence by:
-
The child participant.
-
Peers within the intervention program.
-
Family members.
-
A neutral rater observing samples in randomized order.
-
Clinicians participating in Camp Dream. Speak. Live.
-
-
On average, significant improvement was observed for all nine core communication competencies except:
-
Body position.
-
Eye contact.
-
Gestures.
-
Facial affect.
-
Intonation.
-
-
Which of the following was demonstrated to impact the gains observed in communication competence?
-
Age.
-
Previous participation in Camp Dream. Speak. Live.
-
Gender.
-
Stuttering frequency.
-
None of the above.
Article Four (pp. 136–146)
-
-
Children with SSD are heterogenous with regard to:
-
Only the severity of their speech production difficulties.
-
Only the types of speech errors they produce.
-
The severity level of their speech production difficulties, profiles of language and cognitive abilities, phonological processing skills, and response to intervention.
-
Only their profiles of language abilities.
-
How they respond to intervention.
-
-
Cumulative intervention intensity includes:
-
The total period of time over which the intervention is provided, such as one semester of the school year.
-
The number of teaching episodes per session, number of sessions per unit of time, and total intervention duration, such as 100 practice trials × sessions weekly × 18 weeks = 3,600 trials.
-
The number of properly implemented teaching episodes per session, such as 100 production trials in one session.
-
The context within which the teaching episodes occur, such as conversation with two peers.
-
The number of sessions per unit of time, such as two sessions per week.
-
-
The integration of PA training in speech therapy for children with SSD has been shown to:
-
Only be effective if speech therapy is in a group setting.
-
Only be effective if speech therapy is with individual children.
-
Lead to improvement in PA skills, but not speech production accuracy.
-
Lead to improvement in speech production accuracy, but not PA skills.
-
Lead to improvements in both PA and speech production accuracy, both in group and in individual speech intervention.
-
-
Following morphological awareness intervention, greatest gains in literacy skills have been found in:
-
Elementary-school children with speech and language delays who received instruction for at least 10 hours.
-
Preschoolers with speech and language delays who received instruction for at least 5 hours.
-
Elementary-school children with typical speech and language development who received instruction for at least 20 hours.
-
Elementary-school children with speech and language delays who received instruction for at least 5 hours.
-
Preschoolers with typical speech and language skills who received instruction for at least 10 hours.
-
-
To maximize gains in speech production, PA, MA, vocabulary, decoding, and spelling, it is recommended to target:
-
Speech production accuracy alone.
-
Phonological awareness alone.
-
Morphological awareness alone.
-
Phonological awareness and morphological awareness.
-
Speech production accuracy, phonological awareness, and morphological awareness.
Article Five (pp. 147–161)
-
-
Culturally and linguistically responsive (CLR) practices involve:
-
Translating all materials into the student’s native language for all English learners (ELs).
-
Focusing on only the student’s native language.
-
Using effective instruction strategies that reflect and incorporate an EL’s experiences, home culture, and language strengths.
-
Concentrating only on your particular role with the student.
-
Celebrating student holidays and traditions.
-
-
Key CLR features to integrate in PLAAFP statements for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students who are ELs are:
-
The student’s strengths, the student’s needs, and the student’s family needs.
-
The student’s English language proficiency levels and the tools used to determine proficiency levels, the student’s cultural and linguistic skills, and instructional conditions in which the student best learns.
-
Only information from the speech-language therapy sessions.
-
The student’s preferred language to speak, the student’s current academic performance, and the student’s family needs.
-
The student’s native language, the SLP’s experience with the student’s native language and culture, and the SLP’s experience with the student’s speech/language disorder.
-
-
CLR instructional accommodations that should be considered for ELs are:
-
Simplified language.
-
Explicit academic vocabulary instruction.
-
Oral responses in place of written responses.
-
Extending wait time for processing.
-
All of the above.
-
-
Use of content-translated materials for ELs is appropriate when:
-
Translated materials are available.
-
No other peer speaks the native language to interpret.
-
The EL has a strong foundation in their native language.
-
The EL has a weak foundation in their native language.
-
The EL has adequate listening and reading skills in English.
-
-
The interpreter’s primary role is to:
-
Schedule meetings with team members and the EL’s family.
-
Actively participate in team discussions.
-
Research definitions of technical terms used in team discussions.
-
Translate all written materials used by the EL.
-
Only interpret the oral communication of all members present at the meeting.
Article Six (pp. 162–176)
-
-
Telepractice can be described as:
-
An intervention strategy for students with communication impairments.
-
An innovative but short-lived fad in health care.
-
A service delivery model with a wealth of empirical evidence.
-
A promising service delivery model with a growing evidence base.
-
None of the above.
-
-
Which statement best characterizes the current evidence base for schoolbased service delivery models?
-
Only in-person service delivery models have a sufficient evidence base.
-
It is not necessary to establish a sufficient evidence base for a service delivery model.
-
We have yet to establish a sufficient evidence base for any school-based service delivery models.
-
Most researchers believe it is impossible to achieve an evidence base for service delivery models.
-
Pull-out and collaborative classroom service delivery are considered the best service delivery models.
-
-
When considering providing services through telepractice, the school-based SLP should first:
-
Observe telepractice services being conducted.
-
Ensure that telepractice services can legally be provided in the state where the SLP intends to provide services.
-
Conduct a trial of telepractice with available technology.
-
Attend a telepractice continuing education event.
-
Request permission from their school district.
-
-
Which statement best describes a “student-centered approach” to technology selection?
-
The SLP selects technology after first determining the intervention to be provided.
-
The SLP selects technology that meets the industry standard for student-approved technology.
-
The SLP selects technology that she observes students typically utilizing.
-
The SLP selects technology approved by the state educational association.
-
The SLP selects technology that school-age students utilize in the classroom.
-
-
When providing school-based telepractice services, the SLP:
-
Must only comply with IDEA 2004 and FERPA regulations.
-
Must comply with IDEA 2004 and FERPA regulations and may have to comply with HITECH regulations.
-
Must comply with IDEA 2004 and FERPA, and may need to comply with HIPAA, HITECH, and any state regulations.
-
Must comply with IDEA 2004 and any applicable state regulations.
-
Must comply with state regulations as they encompass all required safety and confidentiality precautions.
-
Publication History
Article published online:
16 March 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA