Semin Speech Lang 2021; 42(02): 147-161
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723841
Review Article

Enhancing Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Features of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) for Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs)

Le M. Tran
1   Department of Special Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Janet Lober
2   Speech and Language Department at Topeka Public Schools, Topeka, Kansas
,
James R. Patton
1   Department of Special Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Individual education programs (IEPs) are the foundation for guiding speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to develop appropriate interventions for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students who qualify for speech-language services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. There is a growing number of CLD students with speech-language impairments who need special attention given to their culture and language. This article highlights key culturally and linguistically responsive features to aid SLPs in developing meaningful IEPs for this diverse group of students.

Financial Disclosures

No relevant financial relationships exist for any of the authors.


Nonfinancial Disclosures

No relevant nonfinancial relationships exist for any of the authors.




Publication History

Article published online:
16 March 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Promoting the Educational Success of Children and Youth Learning English: Promising Futures. The National Academies Press; 2017
  • 2 National Center for Education Statistics. English Language Learners in Public Schools. 2020
  • 3 Watkins E, Liu KK. Who are English language learners with disabilities?. Impact (Sydney) 2013; 26 (01) 2-3
  • 4 U.S. Department of Education. Our nation's English learners: what are their characteristics?. 2017 . Accessed January 5, 2021 at: https://www2.ed.gov/datastory/el-characteristics/index.html#intro
  • 5 Hoover JJ, Patton JR. IEPs for ELs: and Other Diverse Learners. Corwin; 2017
  • 6 Gay G. Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. J Teach Educ 2002; 53 (02) 106-116
  • 7 Metropolitan Center for Urban Education. Academic Interventions for Struggling Learners: Using Culturally Responsive Instructional Support Teams. 2008 . Accessed January 5, 2021 at: https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/scmsAdmin/uploads/005/119/Academic%20Interventions1.pdf
  • 8 Caires-Hurley J, Jimenez-Silva M, Schepers O. Transforming education with problem-based learning: documenting missed opportunities for multicultural perspectives. Multicult Perspect 2020; 22 (03) 118-126
  • 9 National Center for Education Statistics. English language learners in public schools. 2019 . Accessed January 5, 2021 at: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp
  • 10 Jenkins K, Rojas R. Developing cultural competence from a funds of knowledge framework: ethnographic interviewing revisited. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2020; ;(epub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00081.
  • 11 Valdés G, Kibler A, Walqui A. Changes in the Expertise of ESL Professionals: Knowledge and Action in an Era of New Standards. TESOL International Association; 2014
  • 12 Perez B. Sociocultural Contexts of Language and Literacy. Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998
  • 13 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. 2004
  • 14 Tran LM, Patton JR, Brohammer M. Preparing educators for developing culturally and linguistically responsive IEPs. Teach Educ Spec Educ 2018; 41 (03) 229-242
  • 15 Every Student Succeeds Act. Public Law No: 114–95. 2015
  • 16 Hoover JJ, Erickson JR, Patton JR, Sacco DM, Tran LM. Examining IEPs of English learners with learning disabilities for cultural and linguistic responsiveness. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2019; 34 (01) 14-22
  • 17 Hoover JJ, deBettencourt LU. Educating culturally and linguistically diverse exceptional learners: the need for continued advocacy. Exceptionality 2018; 23 (03) 176-189
  • 18 Dardor A. Culture and Power in the Classroom: Educational Foundations for the Schooling of Bicultural Students. Paradigm Publishers; 2012
  • 19 Klingner JK, Artiles AJ, Barletta LM. English language learners who struggle with reading: language acquisition or LD?. J Learn Disabil 2006; 39 (02) 108-128
  • 20 Portes A, Rumbaut R. Not everyone is chosen: segmented assimilation and its determinants. In: Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. 2001: 44-69
  • 21 Ladson-Billings G. But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Pract 1995; 34 (03) 159-165
  • 22 Gay G. Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd ed.. Teacher's College Press; 2018
  • 23 Hammond Z. Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain: Promoting Authentic Engagement and Rigor among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students. 1st ed.. Corwin; 2014
  • 24 Cartledge G, Kourea L. Culturally responsive classroom for culturally diverse students with and at risk for disabilities. Except Child 2008; 74 (03) 351-371
  • 25 Billingsley BS. Special education teacher retention and attrition. J Spec Educ 2004; 38 (01) 39-55
  • 26 Rosa-Lugo LI, Mihai FM, Nutta JW. Preparation of speech-language pathologists to work with English learners (ELs): incorporating interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional collaborative practice (IPP) competencies. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2016; 2 (03) 103-121
  • 27 WIDA Consortium. CAN DO Descriptors. University of Wisconsin, School of Education. . Accessed January 5,2021 at: https://www.wida.us/standards/CAN_DOs/index.aspx
  • 28 Goldstein B. Resource Guide on Cultural and Linguistic Diversity. Singular Publishing Group; 2000
  • 29 Angulo-Jimenez H. Bilingualism and autism: addressing parents; frequently asked questions. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2018; 3 (02) 98-105
  • 30 Kester ES. Difference or Disorder: Understanding Speech and Language Patterns in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students. Bilinguistics, Inc.; 2014
  • 31 Crosnoe R, Turley RNL. K-12 educational outcomes of immigrant youth. Future Child 2011; 21 (01) 129-152
  • 32 Pennock-Roman M, Rivera C. Mean effects of test accommodations for ELLs and non-ELLs: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Educ Meas 2011; 30 (03) 10-28
  • 33 Abedi A. Psychometric issues in the ELL assessment and special education eligibility. Teachers Record 2006; 108 (11) 2282-2303
  • 34 Sullivan A. Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners. Except Child 2011; 77 (03) 317-334
  • 35 Goldenberg C. Unlocking the research on English learners: what we know and don't yet know about effective instruction. Am Educ 2013; 37 (02) 4-11
  • 36 Kieffer MJ, Lesaux NK, Rivera M, Francis DJ. Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: a meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Rev Educ Res 2009; 79 (03) 1168-1201
  • 37 Kulkarni SS, Parmar J. Culturally and linguistically diverse student and family perspectives of AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2017; 33 (03) 170-180
  • 38 Mindel M, John J. Bridging the school and home divide for culturally and linguistically diverse families using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2018; 3 (12) 154-163
  • 39 Harry B, Kalyanpur M, Day M. Building Cultural Reciprocity with Families: Case Studies in Special Education. P.H. Brookes Pub. Co.; 1999
  • 40 Hart JE, Cheatham G, Jimenez-Suarz M. Facilitating quality language interpretation for families of diverse students with special needs. Prev Sch Fail 2012; 56 (04) 207-213
  • 41 Zhang C, Bennett T. Facilitating the meaningful participation of culturally and linguistically diverse families in the IFSP and IEP process. Focus Autism Other Developm Disab 2013; 18 (01) 51-59